Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

2 immense Easter Island achievements

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: 2 immense Easter Island achievements
    Posted: 28-Mar-2008 at 03:23
Originally posted by Seko

Pinguin, how about making reference to your resources regarding the virtues of Austronesian sailors. Share info on the catamarans, etc. Leave the comparisons with other peoples out of your post too. Thanks.
 
I can't post details right now. However, you could take a look at these sites. I bet you will be surprised by the tecnical details.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Seko View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor
Avatar
Spammer

Joined: 01-Sep-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8595
  Quote Seko Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Mar-2008 at 16:17
Pinguin, how about making reference to your resources regarding the virtues of Austronesian sailors. Share info on the catamarans, etc. Leave the comparisons with other peoples out of your post too. Thanks.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2008 at 14:08
Originally posted by red clay

 Odd how you accept voyages of 3-4,000 mi. in the Pacific in open canoes, but not the Atlantic.  Particularly if the South Atlantic circulation was followed the longest leg in open water would have only been approx 1,100 mi.
 
 
Nothing odd about it. Austronesian sailors (Indonesian/Javaneses and Polynesians) were far better sailors than the rest of Eurasians and by far. Just compare the history of navigation, and the techniques, of ancient Europeans and Mediterraneans with Austronesians, and you will get convinced.
By the way, Polynesians didn't cross the pacific in canoes, but catamarans. Saying a catamaran is a canoe is like saying a F-1 car is a bike.  No way to compare both.
 


Edited by pinguin - 26-Mar-2008 at 14:09
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2008 at 13:02
Originally posted by pinguin

Originally posted by rider

How on earth can you accidentally find something THAT small?
 
Following the birds... I am not kidding.
 
And also, seeing the presence of islans far away by "reading" the waves patterns and clowds configurations. It is quite complex the empirical methods polynesian had to determine the presence of far away land. But, I tell you, they weren't just travelling blind in that huge ocean that is the Pacific.
 
 
Odd how you accept voyages of 3-4,000 mi. in the Pacific in open canoes, but not the Atlantic.  Particularly if the South Atlantic circulation was followed the longest leg in open water would have only been approx 1,100 mi.
 
 
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
red clay View Drop Down
Administrator
Administrator
Avatar
Tomato Master Emeritus

Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
  Quote red clay Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2008 at 12:55
Originally posted by pinguin

references, please.
 
 
 
Why? you never do.  I'll change that to seldom.
 
 


Edited by red clay - 26-Mar-2008 at 12:56
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2008 at 12:35
references, please.
 
 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2008 at 00:39
Originally posted by pinguin

Originally posted by Mixcoatl

...
Also it would mean that Polynesians would have stopped their explorations after having reach Easter Islands. (and after all they did reach Sala y Gmez)
 
Where did you get that?
 
Salas y Gmez didn't have settlers at contact time. I have never heared that Polynesians reached there.

It was not inhabited, but the Eastern Islanders were aware of its existance, evidenced by the fact they had a name for it: Birds Island on the Way to a Far Away Land...
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 23:51
Originally posted by rider

How on earth can you accidentally find something THAT small?
 
Following the birds... I am not kidding.
 
And also, seeing the presence of islans far away by "reading" the waves patterns and clowds configurations. It is quite complex the empirical methods polynesian had to determine the presence of far away land. But, I tell you, they weren't just travelling blind in that huge ocean that is the Pacific.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 23:48
Originally posted by Mixcoatl

...
Also it would mean that Polynesians would have stopped their explorations after having reach Easter Islands. (and after all they did reach Sala y Gmez)
 
Where did you get that?
 
Salas y Gmez didn't have settlers at contact time. I have never heared that Polynesians reached there.
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 19:27
How on earth can you accidentally find something THAT small?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 18:06
500 or so km east of Easter Island, its size is less than one square km.
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 17:14
Where's Sala y Gomez?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 11:58
Originally posted by pinguin

Originally posted by rider

I think it would be rather difficult to miss S-America if you started towards it...
 
 
If reached South America alive, of course. 3.500 kms. aren't a piece of cake at all. Not even for Polynesians.

But on the other hand, they probably landed on Easter Island after sailing eastwards from French Polynesia into the unknown it would have been an extraordinary coincidence if Polynesians did hit one tiny island which they did not know existed but did never reach a huge continent.

Also it would mean that Polynesians would have stopped their explorations after having reach Easter Islands. (and after all they did reach Sala y Gmez)
Back to Top
Sander View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator


Joined: 20-Mar-2007
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 597
  Quote Sander Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 05:15
Wether they did or not is different issue but there is little reason to think they could nt.
 
Some 3500 km to the americas would be rather a piece of cake compared to the discovery of easter island and some other places. The really hard thing in long open sea sailing is not to keep sailing but to  hit your target. If the target aint known its a matter of surviving untill you reach something.  In case of the Americas, a gigantic target ( 30.000  km from north to south ) that cannot be missed is awaiting after 3500 km sailing east, while in case of easter island they sailed ( at least ) 1500 km  to hit a tiny spot.
 
 
 


Edited by Sander - 25-Mar-2008 at 05:39
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 00:42
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

...
The Javanese, Tanzanians, Kenyans, Zimbabweans and Madagascans are however, and they all were writing down what the king had for dinner.
 
Really? If you mean the Austronesian settlement of Madagascar, as far as I know there didn't carry writen language to Africa. If I am wrong, please site sources. That's a topic on which I am very interested.
 
Anyways, Indonesia is just below the equator, so I guess it is in the Southern Hemisphere, but I forgot about it.

Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

...
Its not if you knew it was there. People have sailed Polynesian ships from Easter Island to Chile in modern times.
 
 
Of course I know those ideas. I am Chilean LOL
 
There is no definitive proof that such a theoretical trip ever happened, though.
 
 
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim

...
Even if they did go they probably would just have been outnumbered and integrated into the native population.
 
Certainly. If that ever happened, the most likely would be it was a one-way-trip.
 
For instance, the tree of bread and pigs were unknown in South America in pre-contact times. If visits were routinary, then certainly those animals would have existed in the Americas as well.
 
The only evidence that may point to a possible contact are:
 
(1) The presence of sweet potato in Polynesia; which could have spread after columbus, anyways, but nobody is certain.
 
(2) The Araucanian (Mapuche) chicken, that existed in Chile before contact, and that was the only chicken in the Americas.
 
(3) Curantos, or sea food cooked in a hole in the ground, made of rocks, and covered with vegetables, that could be a parallel invention or a Polynesian influence.
 
However, everything is circumstancial. No direct evidence of Polynesian presence has ever been found in South America.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Mar-2008 at 00:28
Originally posted by rider

I think it would be rather difficult to miss S-America if you started towards it...
 
 
If reached South America alive, of course. 3.500 kms. aren't a piece of cake at all. Not even for Polynesians. Even more, Polynesians have many stories about sailors missing.
 
Originally posted by rider


Oh, Penguin, I did mean the stone constructions and buildings, not statues.
 
Well, in that case I agree. Just remember Sacsawaman.
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Mar-2008 at 18:03
I think it would be rather difficult to miss S-America if you started towards it...

Oh, Penguin, I did mean the stone constructions and buildings, not statues.


Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Mar-2008 at 08:32
And perhaps the only people in the southern hemisphere that had it. (Incas lacked it, and Mayans aren't in the Southern Hemisphere)

The Javanese, Tanzanians, Kenyans, Zimbabweans and Madagascans are however, and they all were writing down what the king had for dinner.

To reach it from Easter Island, they would have need to travel 3.525 km. more of open sea. That's too much, I guess.

Its not if you knew it was there. People have sailed Polynesian ships from Easter Island to Chile in modern times.
Even if they did go they probably would just have been outnumbered and integrated into the native population.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Mar-2008 at 13:23

That's why I really don't believe Polynesians reached the Americas.

To reach it from Easter Island, they would have need to travel 3.525 km. more of open sea. That's too much, I guess.
Back to Top
Sander View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator


Joined: 20-Mar-2007
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 597
  Quote Sander Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Mar-2008 at 18:57
Originally posted by Mixcoatl

I cant think of any other longer ancient voyage , fully oceanic and non- stop that can be proven.

Perhaps the people who populated Madagascar? They were Austronesians, so they came at the least from Indonesia.
Good suggestion.
 
In case of the  deep sea route , which seems the most likely one, the route was Malay archipelago> Nicobars > India > Maledives > Seychelles > Madagscar but in theory Diego Garcia ( below the Maledives) could have been touched on the way. From there the longest open sea leg would be slightly less than 1500 km. Of course, its not said that they used all possible stops- they might as well have skipped some- but i m just pointing out the  possibilities.  
 
In case of Easter Island, the funny thing is that I cannot even find a possibility to  get there without crossing at least 1500 km of open sea.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.