Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Oldest civilization in the world?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Oldest civilization in the world?
    Posted: 05-Mar-2006 at 10:58
YES OLDEST CIVILISATION
Back to Top
Iranian41ife View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
  Quote Iranian41ife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Mar-2006 at 10:56

oldest civilisation!

"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Mar-2006 at 10:46

TURKISH ...BC 7500

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Mar-2006 at 08:17
Minoans were not any offshot of Egypt (though they have some infuences)...

But Minoans are too young. Minoan civilization starts only c. 2000 BCE.




Edited by Maju

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Maljkovic View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
  Quote Maljkovic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Mar-2006 at 07:20

Originally posted by Polish Rob

Anybody ever consider the Minoan civilization?

Minoans were an ofshot of Egypt.

Back to Top
Polish Rob View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 02-Mar-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Polish Rob Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Mar-2006 at 23:52
Anybody ever consider the Minoan civilization?
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Mar-2006 at 10:19
Glad that you said it, Sharrukin, Summerians are the oldest known and they spoke something that is unrelated to any other language (speculatively it could be Austric).

Akkadians, Assyrians and Baylonians (Chaldeans) were three diferent but related Semitic peoples. Most diferent seem the Assyrians, at least culturally but guess that Assyrian could be right making them descendant of Akkadians - just hypothetically. Chaldeans seem Amorites (aka Canaanites or Phoenicians), not Akadians nor Assyrians.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Sharrukin View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
  Quote Sharrukin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Mar-2006 at 04:09

Mesopotamia was home to some of the oldest major ancient civilizations, including the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians and Assyrians. They were all one people and spoked the same language. There were no differences between them. 

The Sumerians spoke "Sumerian", a language totally unrelated to Akkadian (i.e. Old Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian).  Sumerian was an agglutinative language, whereas Akkadian languages were inflective languages. 

Back to Top
Assyrian View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 28-Feb-2006
Location: Denmark
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote Assyrian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2006 at 15:35

Assyria is located in north Mesopotamia and spans four countries: In Syria it extends west to the Euphrates river; in Turkey it extends north to Harran, Edessa, Diyarbakir, and Lake Van; in Iran it extends east to Lake Urmi, and in Iraq it extends to about 100 miles south of Kirkuk. This is the Assyrian heartland, from which so much of the ancient Near East came to be controlled.

Two great rivers run through Assyria, the Tigris and the Euhprates, and many lesser ones, the most important of which being the Upper Zab and Lower Zab, both tributaries to the Tigris. Strategically surrounding the Tigris and the two Zabs are the Assyrian cities of Nineveh, Ashur, Arbel, Nimrod and Arrapkha.

To the north and east of Assyria lie the Taurus and Zagros mountains. To the west and south lies a great, low limestone plateau. At the southern end of Assyria the gravel plains give way to alluvium deposited by the Tigris, and farther south there is insufficient rainfall for agriculture without irrigation. These two features create a geogrpahical boundary between Assyria and the neighboring land to the south.

Assyrians have used two languages throughout their history: ancient Assyrian (Akkadian), and Modern Assyrian (neo-syriac). Akkadian was written with the cuneiform writing system, on clay tablets, and was in use from the beginning to about 750 B.C.. By 750 B.C., a new way of writing, on parchment, leather, or papyrus, was developed, and the people who brought this method of writing with them, the Arameans, would eventually see their language, Aramaic, supplant Ancient Assyrian because of the technological breakthrough in writing. Aramaic was made the second official language of the Assyrian empire in 752 B.C. Although Assyrians switched to Aramaic, it was not wholesale transplantation. The brand of Aramaic that Assyrians spoke was, and is, heavily infused with Akkadian words, so much so that scholars refer to it as Assyrian- Aramaic.

Assyria

Mesopotamia was home to some of the oldest major ancient civilizations, including the Sumerians, Akkadians, Babylonians and Assyrians. They were all one people and spoked the same language. There were no differences between them.  My conclusion is that everybody knows that the world first civilisation started in Mesopotamia. Many scientist, professors and archaeologist have evidence and proved that it started with Mesopotamia..

 

Back to Top
Maljkovic View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
  Quote Maljkovic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Feb-2006 at 06:06
Recent discovery of a sunken city at the bay of Combay was dated back 9500 years ago.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Feb-2006 at 22:58
Can you explain, Maljkovic? 

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Maljkovic View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 27-Feb-2006
Location: Croatia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 294
  Quote Maljkovic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Feb-2006 at 13:36

1.Melunhnan 7500 BC

 

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Feb-2006 at 22:26

There has been no archeological proof of the Aryan invasion theory.



There's almost no archaelogical proof of the very existence of the Vedic period (apart of the lack of cities and little more)...

But the "Aryan" (IE) invasion is probably true due to indirect evidence. For instance: it's quite clear that non-Indian IEs did not come from India. Instead it's very likely that they arose in the Volga-Ural region before 3500 BCE.

Harappans don't seem by their archaeology to be IEs.


However i propose they were wiped out by diseases brought along by the aryans, to which they had no immunity.



Unlikely. Harappans just remained and were assimilated - at least the mass of the people.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
malizai_ View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Alcinous

Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
  Quote malizai_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Feb-2006 at 20:24

Harrappa deserves to get more then a mention. The ordering list is a useless exercise, for civilisations coexisted.

 

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/334517.stm

 

http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/southasia/History/Ancient/Indus2. html

 

http://asnic.utexas.edu/asnic/subject/peoplesandlanguages.ht ml

 

http://www.harappa.com/script/indusscript.html

 

A bit of cut and paste for a quick read and general idea.

 

 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

What was life like, over 4,000 years ago, in Harappa and in Mohenjo-Daro, two busy cities of about 35,000 people each?  Would you have wanted to live in one of these flourishing ancient cities? (I think they sound neat!) Let's see what you think!  

 

Homes: Houses were one or two stories high, made of baked brick, with flat roofs, and were just about identical. Each was built around a courtyard, with windows overlooking the courtyard. The outside walls had no windows. Each home had its own private drinking well and its own private bathroom. Clay pipes led from the bathrooms to sewers located under the streets. These sewers drained into nearly rivers and streams. This was a very advanced civilization!

 

Clothing:  Men and women dressed in colorful robes. Women wore jewelry of gold and precious stone, and even wore lipstick! Among the treasures found was a statue of a women wearing a bracelet. (Bracelets with similar designs are worn today in India.)

 

Entertainment: A beautiful small bronze statue of a dancer was found, which tells us that they enjoyed dance and had great skill working with metals. In the ancient city of Mohenjo-daro, scientists have found the remains of a large central pool, with steps leading down at both ends. This could have been a public swimming pool, or perhaps have been used for religious ceremonies. Around this large central pool were smaller rooms, that might have dressing rooms, and smaller pools that might have been private baths.

 

Food: Dinner might have been warm tasty wheat bread served with barley or rice. It would appear they were very good farmers. They grew barley, peas, melons, wheat, and dates. Farms raised cotton and kept herds of sheep, pigs, zebus (a kind of cow), and water buffalo. Fish were caught in the river with fish hooks!  Each town had a large central storage building for grain. Crops were grown, and the harvest stored centrally, for all in the town to enjoy.   

 

Toys:  Some of the toys found were small carts, whistles shaped like birds, and toy monkeys which could slide down a string!

 

Art:  This ancient civilization must have had marvelous craftsmen, skilled in pottery, weaving, and metal working. The pottery that has been found is of very high quality, with unusually beautiful designs. Several small figures of animals, such as monkeys, have been found. These small figures could be objects of art or toys. There are also small statues of what they think are female gods. So far, scientists have found no large statues. They have found bowls made of bronze and silver, and many beads and ornaments. The metals used to make these things are not found in the Indus Valley. So, either the people who lived in this ancient civilization had to import all of these items from some other place, or more probably, had to import the metals they used to make these beautiful things from somewhere else.

 

Transportation: The people used camels, oxen and elephants to travel over land. They had carts with wooden wheels. They had ships, with one mast, probably used to sail around the Arabian Sea. Seals with a pictographic script, which has not as yet been deciphered, were found at the Indus Valley sites. Similar seals were found in Mesopotamia, which seems to indicate possible trade between these two civilizations.

 

The Riddle of the Indus: What does it take to build a city with straight streets and well designed sewers? It takes smart engineers and a lot of planning! These well organized cities suggest a well organized government and probably a well-developed social life.

 

What is amazing is that it appears the Harappan cities did not develop slowly, which suggests that whoever built these cities learned to do so in another place. As the Indus flooded, cities were rebuilt on top of each other. Archaeologists have discovered several different cities, one built over the other, each built a little less skillfully. The most skillful was on bottom. It would appear that builders grew less able or less interested in perfection over time. Still, each city is a marvel, and each greatly advanced for its time.

 

What else have scientists discovered about this fascinating culture? LOTS! Their towns were laid out in grids everywhere (straight streets, well built homes!) These people were incredible builders! Scientists have found what they think are giant reservoirs for fresh water. They have also found that even the smallest house at the edge of each town was linked to that town's central drainage system. (Is it possible that they not only drained waste water out, but also had a system to pump fresh water into their homes, similar to modern plumbing? What a neat thought! Who were these people? Remember-these systems were built over 3,500 years ago!)

 

Although scientists can not yet read the language, they are beginning to believe these people had a common language! That's incredible! As well, scientists have found artifacts at different sites (towns) with the same or similar picture of a unicorn on them. India Today suggested humorously that perhaps it was a logo - like Pepsi and Coke, only this one was Unicorn!

 

What next? Scientists remain very curious about these people, who lived about the same time in history as the ancient Mesopotamians and the ancient Egyptians. Did these ancient civilizations know each other in ancient times? My personal opinion is - yes! As scientists continue to unravel the riddle of the Indus, we may find we will have to rewrite history! Was it the ancient Mesopotamians who first invented the sailboat and the wheel, or was it perhaps the people in the Indus Valley? Where did these people come from, and where did they go? It's a fascinating riddle.

 

We know very little about this civilization, but what we know is fascinating! Over 4,000 years ago, in the Indus Valley, people built huge, planned cities, with straight streets, and brick homes with private baths!  Kids played with toys and women wore lipstick!

+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

 

There has been no archeological proof of the Aryan invasion theory.

 

However i propose they were wiped out by diseases brought along by the aryans, to which they had no immunity.

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 12:09
Originally posted by prsn41ife

 and let me add, the USA can claim native american as their own civilisation,


Not actually: in this case there was a genocide and a mass replacement of population but I'm pretty sure that wasn't the case in the rest of the aforementioned examples. Sumerians abandoned their language for Akkadian and then for Aramean to finally learn Arab... but they are still there: Kuwaities and Iraqui Shias are clearly descendants of the Sumerians.

I don't kow why you have such a problem with that. It's not about claiming because you can perfectly be a direct descendant of Cyrus that you are not him nor can claim what you ancestor did: just bear it like a part of your ancestry, not something you have done yourself. Only what you have done yourself you can claim as fully yours.


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Iranian41ife View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
  Quote Iranian41ife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Feb-2006 at 11:38

Originally posted by Maju



Biologically they are their descendants. It's not just about sharing the land but being the descendants of those people (roughly speaking).

Of course history belongs to all, it's no privative on anyone but I'm used to Spaniards claiming the Celtic and Iberian ancestry, even if they now they speak a dialect Latin. French also claim Gaulish ancestry (with some reason), British venerate Stonehenge as their national monument no.1, despite not knowing even what tongue its builders spoke, Italians (particularly Tuscans) take Etruscans as one of their most famed historical episodes... I see no prob with that.

So Turks can perfectly claim the civilization of Hittites, Hattians, Trojans, Frygians, Lydians and even Asian Greeks and Byzantines.

Iraquis can and should claim as theirs the heritage of Sumerians, Akadians, Babylonians and Assyrians.

Sudanese should claim the Nubian civilization, Egyptians obviously Ancient Egypt, Greeks the pre-Hellenic civilizations such as Crete, Pakistanis the cvilization of Hindus and Iranians, Elamite and Jiroftian civs.

It's part of our past and it's good that we look at it with due respect, not like those Talibans that destroy the works of their own ancestors.

 

 and let me add, the USA can claim native american as their own civilisation, the mongols can claim chinese civilisation,  afghans can claim the mongol empire....

 

is anyone else reading these statements this guy is making?

"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 23:28
Originally posted by prsn41ife

what you say makes no sense at all.

what you are saying is basically this:  turkey can claim hitite, byzantine, trojan, and greek history just because at different points in history these different civilisations inhabited the same land?

and

that Iraq can claim sumerian, babylonian, assyrian, etc... history just because they now have that land.

that makes no sense at all. 



Biologically they are their descendants. It's not just about sharing the land but being the descendants of those people (roughly speaking).

Of course history belongs to all, it's no privative on anyone but I'm used to Spaniards claiming the Celtic and Iberian ancestry, even if they now they speak a dialect Latin. French also claim Gaulish ancestry (with some reason), British venerate Stonehenge as their national monument no.1, despite not knowing even what tongue its builders spoke, Italians (particularly Tuscans) take Etruscans as one of their most famed historical episodes... I see no prob with that.

So Turks can perfectly claim the civilization of Hittites, Hattians, Trojans, Frygians, Lydians and even Asian Greeks and Byzantines.

Iraquis can and should claim as theirs the heritage of Sumerians, Akadians, Babylonians and Assyrians.

Sudanese should claim the Nubian civilization, Egyptians obviously Ancient Egypt, Greeks the pre-Hellenic civilizations such as Crete, Pakistanis the cvilization of Hindus and Iranians, Elamite and Jiroftian civs.

It's part of our past and it's good that we look at it with due respect, not like those Talibans that destroy the works of their own ancestors.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Iranian41ife View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
  Quote Iranian41ife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 16:10

what you say makes no sense at all.

what you are saying is basically this:  turkey can claim hitite, byzantine, trojan, and greek history just because at different points in history these different civilisations inhabited the same land?

and

that Iraq can claim sumerian, babylonian, assyrian, etc... history just because they now have that land.

that makes no sense at all. 

"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 12:20
But the 3500 BCE civilization I refer to probably didn't. Bulgarian (a slavic language) was introduced there in the 7th century CE only.

The question is: give language enough connection? Can we say, for instance, that modern Greeks are the same civilization as the one that built Mycenae and Athens and Thebes c. 1500 BCE?

Or should we rather say: they are the same nation but they have passed through diferent civilizations: Mycenean, (Dark Ages), Classical Greek, (Roman), Byzantine, (Ottoman) and modern Greek. "()" mean transitonal periods of foreign dominance or barbarism.

I'd rather say that the Greek nation has passed by 4 different national civilizations, each one different.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Iranian41ife View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
  Quote Iranian41ife Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Feb-2006 at 11:46
Originally posted by Maju

Originally posted by prsn41ife

this would make more sense if it were:

 

oldest existing civilisation.

which would make the list Iran, China, Greece, and Egypt (if you dont believe that the arabisation of Egypt techinically ended Egypts connection with its past.)



Ah! Do you think that Arabization of Iraq ended Mesopotamian connection with tehir very ancient past? Did Indo-Europeization of Bulgaria end with their also very ancient past? What about Turkey? The memory of Troy was never lost...

I think that you can't make connections between the past and present so easily. Even if the language is kept, like in the case of Iran, Greece or China, there are abyss of time and foreign rule that change things a lot.

 

first of all, turkey has nothing to do with troy, troy was a different civilisation. 

 

and lets see, egyptians now refer to themselves as arabs, speak arabic, and have embraced arabic culture, so some could say that egypt has lost its connection with its ancestors.

and as far as i know, bulgarians still speak bulgarian and still have their own culture.

"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 45678 9>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.082 seconds.