Words of Christ, lacking sources

This is the standard text book lie often propagated and it requires one to ignore not only common sense but the basic truth.

What�s actually written in the Greek texts is Iyo'ous. The Latin word Iesus doesn�t refer to the Yehoshua of the Asiatics and neither does the Greek Iesous. The Latin �Iesus� and the Greek �Iesous� of course refers to the Gallic deity �Esus�, also written as �Hesus�. It�s just that these two words have been hijacked in modern times to describe an alternative Asiatic deity � Yeho, instead of its real transliteration � Esus � the Gallic European deity.

The Hebrew-Aramaic word �Yehoshua� simply does not translate to either Iesous in Greek or Iesus in Latin.

However, the Gallic words �Esus� and �Hesus� do translate, both literally and phonetically, into the Greek Iesous and the Latin Iesus.

All the words Jesus, Esus, Hesus, Iesous and Iesus relate to the same ancient deity � Zeus.

I�ll conclude with an extract of an article I came across and appropriately titled:

Judeo-Christian Heritage is a Hoax

�It appears there is no need to belabor the absurdity and fallacy of the "Judeo-Christian heritage" fiction, which certainly is clear to all honest theologians. That "Judeo-Christian dialogue" in this context is also absurd was well stated in the author initiative religious journal, Judaism, Winter 1966, by Rabbi Eliezar Berkowitz, chairman of the department of Jewish philosophy, at the Hebrew Theological College when he wrote: "As to dialogue in the purely theological sense, nothing could be more fruitless or pointless. Judaism is Judaism because it rejects Christianity; and Christianity is Christianity because it rejects Judaism. What is usually referred to as the Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy."�

�Jewish-Christian traditions exists only in Christian or Secularist Fantasy�

So true!

You�re right, the word Jesus, with its variants Hesus and Esus, is phonetically related with Hay-Seuss - that is Hail-Zeus, and this is what they don�t want you to understand. That is, genuine ancient Christians worshiped Zeus, written as Deus these days, and not any Indian deity called Yeho.

All Gallic-Latin languages of Western Europe such as Spanish, French, Portuguese, Galician and Italian have the words �Hesus� and �Jesus�. The word �Jesus� derives from a Gallic deity originally called �Esus�.

The Gallic people of Europe had a deity called Esus (Hesus) as having been shown with a lamb on one side and an elephant on the other, and that this occurred long before the introduction of Asiatic stories into Europe. It�s mostly symbolic religious language where the elephant, being the largest animal known, was chosen to represent magnitude and power, while the lamb, from its innocent nature, was chosen to represent innocence. Hence we have the Lamb of Jesus. The term �Lamb of Jesus�, like many other terms, derives from the Gallic religion.

The Gallic deity Esus, from which the modern word Jesus derives, is known from an inscription dated to 14 AD where the exact date is determined by the inscription itself on the Altar of the Nautae of Paris, currently in the Cluny Museum.

Esus was also recorded as a Gallic deity by Lucan in his Pharsalia: ��and Esus whose fierce shrine makes men shudder.� Lucan, Pharsalia, 1.445

The Gallic deity Esus is also attested in several European anthroponyms such as Esumagnius - he who is great like Esus.

Esus, was part of the Jupiterean triad and this is where the genuine Catholic trinity derives from. It should be clear by now that genuine Christianity derives from Europe and has nothing to do with the Asiatic testament books which make up the modern bible set of books.

For instance, the combined modern term �Jesus Christ� was never used in any of the original texts of the Bible or Talmuds - rabbinical religious texts. This invented combined term only came up after the Creed of Nicene (325 A.D) whereby the masses were later told the term meant �Jesus the Saviour� and that it was a direct translation from religious books preserved in the Greek language Gospels.

This is of course a complete lie because it�s well known that the Greek word for �saviour� is nothing like the word �Christ� or �Kristo�. The word �saviour� arises from the Hebrew-Aramaic word �shuah� or �shua�, (Yehoshua � Yeho�s saviour) and not from the word �Christo� or �Christ�.

The word �Christo� derives from the Gallic Chrestus and I suggest people read Celsus� On the True Doctrine, ISBN: 0195041518, for more information on the unoriginality of Christian religion as propagated by certain Asiatics.

The combining of the words �Jesus Christ� is what I would call a perfect example of two original Gallic titles passed down to the masses with incorrect meanings that direct many to the  Asiatic-Indian cults instead of the true European Christian religion which many these days simply know as something called pagan.

What they�re also not telling you is that there were many Yehoshuas and that man crucified around 2000 years ago was not the first or the second Yehoshua. The old testament, which predates Yehoshua the Nazarene by hundreds of years, also mentions another Yehoshua, it�s just that modern translators have translated the old testament Yehoshua to Joshua while the new testament Yehoshua has been conveniently rebadged as Jesus � invoking European Gallic terminology into an otherwise Asiatic-Indian cult text which originally had nothing to do with genuine European Christianity.

The inconsistent translation of the old testament Yehoshua to Joshua while the other Yehoshua in the new testament is translated to Jesus is an example of the deceit being propagated.

The new testament set of stories was created to hide the true origins the genuine Christian religion by rebadging some of the genuine Christian events and terms as being Asiatic-Hebrew in nature and linking them to events in Asia which really have nothing to do with genuine Christian religion.

The modern bible � an amalgamation of both the old and new testament stories, further adds to this deception because it not only brings many false invented stories (parts of the new testament), it also brings totally unrelated stories (old testament) under something called Christian � a religion which in its genuine state has very little (5%) to do with what�s been written in the new testament set of stories and absolutely nothing whatsoever to do with the old testament set of stories.

The Roman Empire and the empire of Alexander the Great before it, created a cultural bridge between Asia and Europe. During this time some sort to create a unified empire where everyone was supposed to believe in the same one authority and the same one religion. The main unifying tool was of course to be a new religion (which wasn�t really new but merely a rebadging of several different religions) whereby the glue is the bible.

A bit like taking apart two different model cars and creating a new street machine where the instruction manuals of both cars have been joined into one new instruction manual � the bible.

This new street machine however is 90% (old testament plus much of the new testament) made up from the Asiatic model and only around 5% (parts of Revelation and other small bits) from the European model. The remaining 5% was just invented to make the two separate models work.

The modern bible is merely an erroneous and misguided attempt to bring together several different belief systems into a one size fits all set of books. The old testament set of stories have nothing at all to do with Christianity while only around 5% of the new testament relates to genuine Christian doctrine but even this portion has been somewhat corrupted.

For example, the reincarnation of deities is Asiatic in original and not Christian, that is�genuine Christian. The story of this Yehoshua the Nazarene being the reincarnation of the Lord or the son of the Lord has Indian-Asiatic cult written all over it.