Goguri, Korean or Chinese?

Message Share Topic Printable Version Google Delicious Digg StumbleUpon Windows Live Yahoo Bookmarks reddit Facebook MySpace Newsvine Furl Topic Search Topic Options Post Reply Create New Topic

Originally posted by ChineseManchurian

again, I wound say in Chinese perspective Goguri is a kingdom besidees mainland China. 
all the world consider Goguri is in Korean history, Chinese also. So what? does that means Goguri have any relative with Modern Koreans?(except for some tradition, but you see, Koreans also keep some Chinese traditions also, so Chinese have to be Korean?)
I read a story, that when Tang captured Goguri, They removed all the Goguri people into Chinese villiage, I think Manchurians should be part of Goguri but Goguri have nothing to do with modern Korea.

According to Chinese scholars, most of the Koguryo people were taken into China. They are correct if their assumption that there were only 760,000 people in 760,000 households is correct. Anyways, that's complete stupidity(see how absurd China's claims are?). It is usually estimated that Koguryo's population was at 3.5 million upon its fall, and that about 200,000 were taken into China, while the rest were gradually assimilated into Shilla and Koryo(from Barhae) over a long period of time.

Again, Goguri are also have nothing to do with China, they should be a nation that disspeared in history for 1000 years already. Even Korea or China put into their history, but still can't prove Goguri is Korean or Goguri are Chinese. They are disspeared already. so why should we argue about that? I knows the reason is the Korean nationalism is rising. When I was live in Manchuria many people come from South Korea wrote words on their shirt to say give Manchu to Korea, so I think this is what we argueing about, the land.

Korea's claim over Manchuria isn't an old thing. It was sought for since the fall of Barhae by both Koryo and Chosun Dynasty.

Edited by oblivoin38