Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Kids
Shogun
Joined: 19-Nov-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 238
|
Quote Reply
Topic: How effective is martial art in battles? Posted: 13-Dec-2004 at 20:17 |
is there any real evidence to suppport that?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Dec-2004 at 20:19 |
None at all - you kick me, I'll hack your leg off with my sword - or
I'll shoot you..easy as that - although I assume that when the fight
gets nitty gritty, close combat, it might come in use - although I
doubt any combat narrative will get that close.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Murph
Consul
Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Dec-2004 at 18:15 |
yes, but when you consider martial-arts-using-movie-stars' miraculous ability to miss bullets it looks pretty effective
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Dec-2004 at 20:09 |
Originally posted by Murph
yes, but when you consider martial-arts-using-movie-stars'
miraculous ability to miss bullets it looks pretty effective![](smileys/smiley36.gif) |
Yea, Jet Li has skillz.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Murph
Consul
Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Dec-2004 at 20:35 |
an army of jet li's could easily conquer the world because it seems no one can shoot him, no matter how clear of a shot they have...even a nuke would probably miss
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2004 at 21:02 |
Originally posted by Murph
an army of jet li's could easily conquer the world because
it seems no one can shoot him, no matter how clear of a shot they
have...even a nuke would probably miss |
No doubt
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Genghis
Caliph
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2004 at 22:31 |
How effective was karate when the Okinawans used it against the samurai?
|
Member of IAEA
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
J.M.Finegold
Baron
Joined: 11-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 457
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Dec-2004 at 22:32 |
Originally posted by Genghis
How effective was karate when the Okinawans used it against the samurai? |
I wouldn't really know - however, I think it was more effective for the
Okinawans when the American Shermans began to roll into town. If you're talking about that era...
Edited by DuxPimpJuice
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Illuminati
General
Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Dec-2004 at 01:55 |
It is highly effective.
but I think you have to consider time periods here. Martial Arts have counters for weapons such as swords, axes, staffs, etc...
thats why ti was so heavily used in Asia in ancient times.
Obviously its not as effective anymore because of the invention of
guns. But if a fight ends up coming to a hand to hand battle.....you
better hope your opponent isn't a blackbelt
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Belisarius
Chieftain
Suspended
Joined: 09-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Dec-2004 at 19:53 |
You all of course are aware that martial arts refer to more than just hand-to-hand combat. Martial arts are everything that are well martial. This includes weapons as well.
However, if you are only talking about hand-to-hand combat...
Martial artists are not good as rank and file soldiers. They require a great deal of idividuality to function. Therefore, it would be very difficult to use them tactically. They would probably be better used as bodyguards or an elite force like the Sunbae or Hwarangs of Korea.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ChineseManchurian
Samurai
Joined: 23-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2004 at 02:20 |
What am I going to say is, there is no such things as material art.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Belisarius
Chieftain
Suspended
Joined: 09-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1296
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2004 at 11:15 |
Originally posted by ChineseManchurian
What am I going to say is, there is no such things as material art. |
What does this mean?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Gubook Janggoon
Sultan
Retired Global Moderator
Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2187
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Dec-2004 at 12:07 |
It means martial arts don't exist....which I disagree with...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 12:33 |
Martial Arts would come in handy for battles mabey even 200 years ago, but now it only has a limited use in war.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ChineseManchurian
Samurai
Joined: 23-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 15:30 |
again, material art is only in the book that some famous Chinese arthur had wrote, there is no such thing is material art in the history.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Gubook Janggoon
Sultan
Retired Global Moderator
Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2187
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 15:52 |
Originally posted by ChineseManchurian
again, material art is only in the book that some famous Chinese arthur had wrote, there is no such thing is material art in the history. |
Could you perhaps clarify what you are saying a provide sources?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
demon
Chieftain
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 17:12 |
Martial arts, as they were and as they is now, was not made for that Jet lee movie you see in hollywood.
It was primarly made to train troops so they don't get lazy up their fatty acids.
|
Grrr..
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
dark_one
Baron
Joined: 04-Sep-2004
Location: Russian Federation
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 454
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 17:46 |
I imgaine it wouldn't be useful in so much as a street fight
nowaday. Even in school people have a knife (or in some worse cases a
handgun).
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
demon
Chieftain
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-Dec-2004 at 17:53 |
It's good in disarming a hand knife, or even a hand gun. But I don't think martial arts is all that it takes. Another factor is confidence. Like it takes a huge load of guts to actually tackle on a guy with handgun with your karate skills.
|
Grrr..
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
MoriheiUeshiba
Janissary
Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Dec-2004 at 14:10 |
referring to the post on, karate used against samurai
it was effective, seeming it was said that some samurai opponents could accually punch through there armour
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |