Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Italian Empire in WWII era... Posted: 01-Sep-2007 at 00:37 |
It's another "What if" question. Suppose Italy had great successes in Africa and Greece like Germans were doing in France and Central Europe. Discuss the aftermath...
|
Join us.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
ChickenShoes
Pretorian
Joined: 08-Apr-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 152
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Sep-2007 at 14:00 |
too much of a 'what if', i can't even hypothetically give italy any power because it is that absurd.
|
It is not enough that I succeed - everyone else must fail
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Crystall
Samurai
Joined: 28-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 114
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Sep-2007 at 15:13 |
Originally posted by ChickenShoes
too much of a 'what if', i can't even hypothetically give italy any power because it is that absurd. |
Hah, yeah I am going to have to agree...
It's like saying what if Greece suddenly beat the Italians and invaded and captured Rome. We know Greece could not do this because they were not strong enough to do so.
Maybe this wasn't the best comparison but the point is Italy was not as strong as portrayed thus we cannot be sure
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2007 at 14:30 |
Why not? Italy had enough manpower, and if their military was trained like German military, it won't be an impossible scenario?
|
Join us.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Justinian
Chieftain
King of Númenor
Joined: 11-Nov-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2007 at 14:35 |
Originally posted by pekau
It's another "What if" question. Suppose Italy had great successes in Africa and Greece like Germans were doing in France and Central Europe. Discuss the aftermath... |
Well in this case I would assume you mean the italians being able to take egypt and shut down the suez canal to allied troops. Also that greece would be occupied by the italians. Well that would help the germans out an enormous amount, Barbarossa would still probably start late because of Yugoslavia. Though the germans would have more manpower and the likes of Rommel in russia. I would say the war would last longer, but the end result would be the same. At most perhaps the british offer some sort of peace terms or the western allies break with the russians.
|
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2007 at 14:49 |
As deadkenny pointed out so eloquently elsewhere, every Italian decision was a disaster in the war. Their fleet came out and was sunk, stayed in port and was sunk, surrendered and was sunk.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Serge L
Baron
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 485
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Sep-2007 at 16:36 |
Well, you see, most of the military problems of Italy came from the fact Mussolini was quite incompetent in this field. Moreover, he put on command of armed forces people who, while supposedly loyal to him, were almost as incompetent as he is. A Mussolini ho had just half of the military skills of Hitler could have done the difference.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Sep-2007 at 18:02 |
Originally posted by Serge L
Well, you see, most of the military problems of Italy came from the fact Mussolini was quite incompetent in this field. Moreover, he put on command of armed forces people who, while supposedly loyal to him, were almost as incompetent as he is. A Mussolini ho had just half of the military skills of Hitler could have done the difference.
|
Doubt it. Hitler was a terrible military stragiest like Mussolini. Hitler's generals were brilliant though.
I heard from some members about infamous Italian human torpedo. What's that all about?
|
Join us.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Balaam
Housecarl
Suspended
Joined: 12-Oct-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1286
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 08-Sep-2007 at 07:12 |
Originally posted by pekau
I heard from some members about infamous Italian human torpedo. What's that all about? |
Is that what you are talking about?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
HEROI
Baron
Joined: 06-Jul-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 468
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Sep-2007 at 06:54 |
Italy in WWII had an massive army,but technologically far behind the rest of the powers,and that was the biggest mistake,you cant go in WWII with tanks of WWI and expect to have success,no matter how big is the army and how much manpower you have at your disposal. Industrial wars on massive scales depends on technological advances not on industrial quantity or manpower.
|
Me pune,me perpjekje.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
deadkenny
General
Joined: 21-Aug-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 994
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Sep-2007 at 20:40 |
When posing a hypothetical scenario, it helps to develop it a bit further. Italy somehow 'magically' becoming a major military power is meaningless. Are you asking about what Italy might have done it if had effectively prepared for the war beforehand? Or if it had fought it 'as it was' but had made some better decisions? Most of Il Duce's 'offensives', against France, Egypt or Greece were not properly prepared for. Launching an attack on Greece at all, with the existing situation in North Africa, was obviously a mistake. On the other hand, the Italians might have been more effective if they had dropped the pointless attack through the Alps on an already beaten France and had concentrated on an attack against the British in Egypt while they were at their most vulnerable.
Edited by deadkenny - 09-Sep-2007 at 20:41
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
pekau
Caliph
Atlantean Prophet
Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Sep-2007 at 21:44 |
Originally posted by HEROI
Italy in WWII had an massive army,but technologically far behind the rest of the powers,and that was the biggest mistake,you cant go in WWII with tanks of WWI and expect to have success,no matter how big is the army and how much manpower you have at your disposal. Industrial wars on massive scales depends on technological advances not on industrial quantity or manpower.
|
Italian armies are tecnologically behind rest of the powers, yes. But they were numerically and technologically superior to Greek defenders, aren't they?
|
Join us.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |