1. If Goguri is Chinese, then the history of Pekjae is Chinese as well, because the founder of Pekjae is the son of Goguri (just as China is claiming Old Choson to be theirs because according to them, Chinese people went there and build it and therefore it is chinese). But, ironically, the Chinese is not claiming Pekjae as theirs. It implies another hidden reasoning behind this claim. They want secured ownership of Manchuria. AND GANDO, WHICH MUST BE KOREAN. They are running out of reasons and thus is claiming Goguri as theirs in hopes of changing the claim to their favor.
2. If Goguri is Chinese (because it was founded by Chinese, old Choson which Goguri descends is also found by Chinese), then Jin must be Korean. Here are excerpts from , the history book of Jin (a Chinese webiste with the original excerpts (check the second paragraph): http://www.zs2002.com/book/jins/001.htm :
The founder of Jin is Hambo(Agolta)
ΣҴ
He was 60 years old when he came out of Kori(Koryo) for the first time
֣ͯ
His brother Agohobol did not follow him and stayed in Kori
---what is that telling?
---------if he came out of Kori for the first time when he founded Jin Dynasty...
----------------------and if Kori was decendant of Shilla, a Korean country,
--------------------------------Wouldn't not Jin be Korean according to Chinese..?
(btw, the decendants of May Teja, the last king of Shilla, claims that Agolta is one of his son. The Son of Shilla Ruled Jin and therefore Jin is Korean according to Chinese!)
3. If Goguri is Chinese because its creator was from China and old Choson which Goguri follows also started with Chinese according to Chinese, in addition to all these "influences" and Korea "not having a culture", then Qing is Korean.
The last name of Nurhaci, the creator of Qing dynastly(), had the last name of (Aishin Joure)
It means:"love and never forget Shilla"
Aishin means gold(), but used Chinese letters to aid pronounciation
Jirio means bond/affinity/relationship()
Relationship with gold...but what is that gold?
It all ends up in either Jin Dynasty or the last name of Shilla Kings, Kyongju Kim()
------if 1, Jin Dynasty-----
Because the last name originated from Jin Dynasty, meaning love and never forget Jin Dynasty, we get this conflict. If they envied Jin so much, it implies that jin influenced them a lot. Meaning, Qing adapted its tradition from Jin and thus does not have culture (Chinese analogy of Korea not having culture). Since China claims that because of that reason Goguri is theirs, would not that mean beause of that Qing is Jin therefore it is Korean..........?
------if 2, Kyongju Kim()-----
Love and never forget Shilla....Nurhaci was born in Manchu, along the borderlines of Pekdu montain. Koreans live there. So there is a chance he is Korean. But then, he makes all thesee stuffs that amek him look as if he was a Korean.
The first example comes in imjin war. As soon as the war erupted, Nurhaci =sent a letter to the king of Choson, asking to "send these barbarians out of his motherland". Because the King refused, he did not invervene. But you see his intentions
The seconds example comes when Nurhaci revolts against Ming Dynastty. During the surrender of sanjundo(߲Ԥ- the treaty officializing Korean "surrender" to Qing) Nurhaci asked Choson "we are in fact sons of kori(koryo) and therefore we are the same country. You are the same East Tribe, why not join us and instead to Ming?
So Nurhaci was Korean A korean who was rejected by his own country who nevertheless became the emperor of Qing. And because the Chinese method implies that if the founder is Chinese then the country is Chinese, Qing is Korean.
Even if he was not a Korean, his last name impling "love and never forget shilla" is enough to conclude that he was influyenced by Shilla and therefore Qing had no culture, and therefore it is Korean (according to chinese ideology that because Korea has no cluture it is theirs).
4. Ditto of 1. From (History of Jin), section (someone from manchuria sent his translation to someone which reached me)
the ancestor of Keum is named
Σ he's originally from Koryo
Ҵ he is in his sixties (when he left Koryo)
֣ͯ His older brother, ͯ ? , who is a very religious Budhist
refuses to leave Koryo with him.
أ, 奡 The brother says, our offspring will need a place where they can all return and meet together, I can't leave.
Լ So (the ancestor of Keum) came (to Manchuria) with another younger brother only, whose name is .
?ݻ The ancestor of Keum moves in a place called ?, which is near a river called .
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.
lol,Koreans make the topic always from the Korean side.
From Chinese side, they said Goguri are not Chinese, but also not Korean, because when Tang dynasty capture the land of Goguri, they removed all the people live in there to China as worker, so it has no relative with modern Korean. You can say Goguri is a group of people who live in between China and Korea, but they are not both of them.
Whoa...I havn't seen this thread in a long long long time.....
The idea that Jin (Jurchen) is Korean isn't wide spread, at least in
the academic study of Korean history, so there really isn't a lot of
people spreading that...
ChineseManchurian, if you're interested in this topic maybe you should check out this fiery thread:
The argument went a bit farther then this one did.
BTW China describes Koguryo as an Chinese ethnic minority Kingdom that
took orders from the Tang and Sui courts. You said that Koreans
are the only ones to claim the kingdom, but doesn't the Chinese claim
negate any of the "Not eitherness" of the Kingdom?
I read all the post 17 pages, so tired, but I found a really big mistake for Koreans.
Chinese ethnic minority Kingdom does not mean they are Chinese, also Chinese ethnic minority does not mean they have to be "Han" also, they can be any nations. In China Koreans also call themself as Chinese, even they are not "Han" .
basicly, what I am saying is China is a big country, there is many nations in it, does not must be "Han" people. Also the defination of "Han" people is about people who lives in China, it is nothing about nations problem. Huns went south and they become Chinese does that means they become the same with "Han" people?
Hmmm...Good point, but we went over this in the thread...at least I
thought we did. Indeed, Chinese doens't have to mean Han, it can
mean 1 out of 56 different ethnic minorities. These are all
considered, "Chinese". This is what we mean by China claiming
Koguryo was Chinese, it's an ethnic minority, by no means Han, but
Chinese. It's the "Chinese" part that irks Koreans. Not the
"Han" part, no one ever claimed it was Han.
BTW, you read all 17 pages?! Wow...that's a big feat...
From my side, I am so confused, because I am Korean-Chinese, also part of Manchurian. So I am in the middle of everything, lol.
From my point, Goguri should count as a independent nation in history, but Chinese and Korean also can say it is ancient ethnic minority of China and Korea. I think Goguri is like Huns in the history and now, Hugarians were keep some traditions from Huns, but we can not say Hun is part of Hungarian history, better to say is a ethnic minority lived in this land. Same with Goguri, they are different from China and Korea, so let's just leave this problem away. From different perspective we will get different answer.
I don't know why you want to leave this question alone...as long as we
don't get all fiery and nationalistic it can get very interesting...it
raises a few very nice questions...
Just a bit on what you said on ethnic minorities. Koreans don't
view Koguryo as an ethnic minority group. The difference between
China and Korea is that Korea is a homogenous nation. There are
no ethnic minorities. Koguryo is viewed as one of the founding
pillars of the Korean race, along with Baekje, and Shilla. By
claiming that Koguryo with Korea you would be taking a full third of
the Korean identity away. I think it's foolish to trace an ethnic
groups lineage linearly. Rather we must understand that we are
all a hybrid of some sorts.
Up till now, Koguryo has been considered a part of Korean history
around the world, even in China. It is generally accepted to be a
"korean Kingdom". What would make Koguryo a Chinese
kingdom? The main 2 reasons that I have heard are that most of
Koguryo land is now in China and that some of Koguryo people
assimilated into "Chinese" society. The problem I find with these
claims is that I find that they do not hold much sense. Is
Alexander the Great's kingdom considered to be Persian because most of
it's land is now in Persian lands? Is the history of Mexico
considered a part of the history of the U.S.A. as many Mexicans were
assimilated into U.S. culture when the U.S.A. aquired its southwestern
territories from Mexico after the Mexican-American war?
*Note. I'm not trying to start an argument here, rather a
discussion. I want to actually discuss this and not have it turn
into nationalistic blather...
again, I wound say in Chinese perspective Goguri is a kingdom besidees mainland China.
all the world consider Goguri is in Korean history, Chinese also. So what? does that means Goguri have any relative with Modern Koreans?(except for some tradition, but you see, Koreans also keep some Chinese traditions also, so Chinese have to be Korean?)
I read a story, that when Tang captured Goguri, They removed all the Goguri people into Chinese villiage, I think Manchurians should be part of Goguri but Goguri have nothing to do with modern Korea.
Like what you said, Alexander's conquest conquered Persian empire, then they actually became a Asian empire. only because Alexander die too quick so we can not prove it. but look for why happen to Seleucid you will find out.
Again, Goguri are also have nothing to do with China, they should be a nation that disspeared in history for 1000 years already. Even Korea or China put into their history, but still can't prove Goguri is Korean or Goguri are Chinese. They are disspeared already. so why should we argue about that? I knows the reason is the Korean nationalism is rising. When I was live in Manchuria many people come from South Korea wrote words on their shirt to say give Manchu to Korea, so I think this is what we argueing about, the land.
Hmm...well I'm not arguing about land...other people are. So a
people
who weren't Chinese but weren't Korean either. I see. Well
you see
here's how it's seen in Korea. It's thought that Buyeo claimed
that it was from Gojoseon (The first "korean" kingdom) and from Buyeo
it is thought that Koguryo and Baekje were born, Baekje being more of a
mix of the Samhan and Buyeo peoples. Even when China captured the
Koguryo king, they put him in charge of the area as the "king of Chao
Xian". So by taking away Koguryo you are basically taking away
all those other kingdoms in Korean history. If you take one block
out of a block tower the entire thing will collapse.
So why are Koreans being so nationalistic about this? Up till now
Koguryo was pretty synanomous with Korea and not at all with
China. Now China is pushing Koguryo as part of it's proper
history. What are the 3 options facing Koreans then?
1. Let China take it.
2. Share it.
3. Fight for it.
If you were Koreans which option would you take? This would be
like asking Americans to give up their claim on the signing of the
declaration of Independence to Britain.
BTW thanks for visiting my xanga...two of my friends recently broke up,
they were going out, and that kind of killed all of the chatter
boxes....
OMG...I wonder who revived the thread while I was gone
little problem here, you said If Goguri are Chinese, than Jin must be Korean? I think you must make some mistakes on there
Nope, If you are going like what the chinese government is claiming.
I read a story, that when Tang captured Goguri, They removed all the Goguri people into Chinese villiage, I think Manchurians should be part of Goguri but Goguri have nothing to do with modern Korea.
Not all. First of all, 20,000 of them moved to capital of Shilla.
Second of all, all those on northern China moved into Manchuria back to create Barhe. You know it as Bohei. And what did they tell the japanese when they wanted to open trade? What happened when Khitans swept over Barhe? They immigrated to Koryo.
Third of all, Koguryo in Chinese text are under section: foreign(East section to be concise). However, it's so ironic for you to see that all Korean sources have Koguryo mentioned(samguksagi, samgukyusa, handangogi etc)? So, what's up?
Again, Goguri are also have nothing to do with China, they should be a nation that disspeared in history for 1000 years already. Even Korea or China put into their history, but still can't prove Goguri is Korean or Goguri are Chinese. They are disspeared already. so why should we argue about that? I knows the reason is the Korean nationalism is rising. When I was live in Manchuria many people come from South Korea wrote words on their shirt to say give Manchu to Korea, so I think this is what we argueing about, the land.
That's strange(about the korean coming to manchuria thing).
1. Chinese officials restrict all media from visiting ancient sites. I can post pictures if you want to see them. I don't see any point of them actually going there- to get rejected anyway -.- And I don't remember any actual expeditions going on -.-??? Are you sure that happened?
2. The issue is more than just historical claim- and chinese land. More about North Korea.
3. Chinese nationalism is also in rise. See what's going on? Chinese scuds all aiming at taiwan?
4. Koguryo has got to do with Korea. See this koguryo mural?
Look at the bow the dude is carrying. Hmmm...ring any bells?
Still no? And have you seen any Chinese depictions of such?
except for some tradition, but you see, Koreans also keep some Chinese traditions also, so Chinese have to be Korean?)
Unfair example. So the World belongs to Greece(democracy)? World belongs to USA(Macdonalds)? World belongs to China(chinese food)?
Hmm...well I'm not arguing about land...other people are. So a people who weren't Chinese but weren't Korean either. I see. Well you see here's how it's seen in Korea. It's thought that Buyeo claimed that it was from Gojoseon (The first "korean" kingdom) and from Buyeo it is thought that Koguryo and Baekje were born, Baekje being more of a mix of the Samhan and Buyeo peoples. Even when China captured the Koguryo king, they put him in charge of the area as the "king of Chao Xian". So by taking away Koguryo you are basically taking away all those other kingdoms in Korean history. If you take one block out of a block tower the entire thing will collapse.
So why are Koreans being so nationalistic about this? Up till now Koguryo was pretty synanomous with Korea and not at all with China. Now China is pushing Koguryo as part of it's proper history. What are the 3 options facing Koreans then?
1. Let China take it. 2. Share it. 3. Fight for it.
If you were Koreans which option would you take? This would be like asking Americans to give up their claim on the signing of the declaration of Independence to Britain.
BTW thanks for visiting my xanga...two of my friends recently broke up, they were going out, and that kind of killed all of the chatter boxes....
First at all, you have to know, When Goguri was destroyed Korean just become a unified nation. That means before the 3 kingdom period they do not call them as Korean, they do not think 3 part were a unified nation. It is same with Chinese worrior state period. People do not have the ID of a unified nation before Chin dominate China. After Chin dominate China Chinese thinks they are a unified nation. Same thing happen to Korea, from my point, Goguri should be a independent nation, I did not consider them as Korean or Chinese, because their culture is already gone.(Korean may have some, but not the mainly culture).
There is no such country named "Chaoxian" in Tang dynasty. And Chinese do not call Korea as Goguri, It is Gaoli, the Korean dynasty.
OMG...I wonder who revived the thread while I was gone
little problem here, you said If Goguri are Chinese, than Jin must be Korean? I think you must make some mistakes on there
Nope, If you are going like what the chinese government is claiming.
I read a story, that when Tang captured Goguri, They removed all the Goguri people into Chinese villiage, I think Manchurians should be part of Goguri but Goguri have nothing to do with modern Korea.
Not all. First of all, 20,000 of them moved to capital of Shilla.
Second of all, all those on northern China moved into Manchuria back to create Barhe. You know it as Bohei. And what did they tell the japanese when they wanted to open trade? What happened when Khitans swept over Barhe? They immigrated to Koryo.
Third of all, Koguryo in Chinese text are under section: foreign(East section to be concise). However, it's so ironic for you to see that all Korean sources have Koguryo mentioned(samguksagi, samgukyusa, handangogi etc)? So, what's up?
Again, Goguri are also have nothing to do with China, they should be a nation that disspeared in history for 1000 years already. Even Korea or China put into their history, but still can't prove Goguri is Korean or Goguri are Chinese. They are disspeared already. so why should we argue about that? I knows the reason is the Korean nationalism is rising. When I was live in Manchuria many people come from South Korea wrote words on their shirt to say give Manchu to Korea, so I think this is what we argueing about, the land.
That's strange(about the korean coming to manchuria thing).
1. Chinese officials restrict all media from visiting ancient sites. I can post pictures if you want to see them. I don't see any point of them actually going there- to get rejected anyway -.- And I don't remember any actual expeditions going on -.-??? Are you sure that happened?
2. The issue is more than just historical claim- and chinese land. More about North Korea.
3. Chinese nationalism is also in rise. See what's going on? Chinese scuds all aiming at taiwan?
4. Koguryo has got to do with Korea. See this koguryo mural?
Look at the bow the dude is carrying. Hmmm...ring any bells?
Still no? And have you seen any Chinese depictions of such?
except for some tradition, but you see, Koreans also keep some Chinese traditions also, so Chinese have to be Korean?)
Unfair example. So the World belongs to Greece(democracy)? World belongs to USA(Macdonalds)? World belongs to China(chinese food)?
lol, I think Korean government got some translation problem or understanding problem. In Chinese, government said that Goguri is a "йŴ߽ϵ", I am not very sure can you really understand Chinese now.
And please remember, Tang taken over Nothern include Pingyang, and some of them were move to the south, but mostly become the new citizens of Silla. like some Carthagians survived in third Punic war, they are slaved, then the culture of Carthage just end it there, you understand what i mean? some may survived but most people forget about there tradition become part of Chinese(and a few of Koreans now).
And Goguri is more like Koreans, but it also have some Chinese culture in it, when China is in three kingdom period, Goguri was trade with "Gongshun" family in the south of Manchuria. They got cultures from Han dynasty and Jin dynasty.
OK, if you think China is aiming Taiwan, then ask Why president Lincoln take over the South.
First at all, you have to know, When Goguri was destroyed Korean just
become a unified nation. That means before the 3 kingdom
period they do not call them as Korean, they do not think 3 part were a
unified nation. It is same with Chinese worrior state period. People do
not have the ID of a unified nation before Chin dominate China. After
Chin dominate China Chinese thinks they are a unified nation. Same
thing happen to Korea, from my point, Goguri should be a independent
nation, I did not consider them as Korean or Chinese, because their
culture is already gone.(Korean may have some, but not the mainly
culture).
There is no such country named "Chaoxian" in Tang dynasty. And
Chinese do not call Korea as Goguri, It is Gaoli, the Korean dynasty.
lol, your Xangga is really cool, really.
There was a unified state before koguryo, go-joseon, which the chinese
referred to as Chao xian. It existed during the Han
dynasty. When Tang took over Koguryo they took it's king and made
him regent of that area with the title, "King of Chao Xian".
Also Can't read that site you gave us. Perhaps you could summarize it?
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum