Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Did you know? Lucky Christians!! Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 05:46 |
1. Genghis Khan's sons Jochi and Tolui are brothers. And their wifes are sisters (Princesses from Kereids). That's why the relation between Jochi's sons (Orda, Batu, Berke, Shiban) and Tolui's sons (Mongke, Kublai, Hulagu, Arigh Boke) is peaceful. The two brothers was very good friends like their wifes.
2. Kereids tribe's religion was Christianity. After early death of Tolui, his wife Sorkhogtani Khatan from Kereids educated his sons (Mongke, Kublai, Hulagu, Arigh Boke) to respect all religion especially Christianity. That's why when Mongke become a Great Khan, he stopped mongol army to invade christian world (Eastern & Western Europe). And sent his brother Hulagu to free Jerusalem from Muslim. Hulagu destroyed Baghdad (all the Christian inhabitants in the city were spared).
Edited by Falco
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 08:00 |
So Christians speak bad of Mongols but they are actually like their protectors. Yeap: lucky Christians.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
|
Attila2
Pretorian
Joined: 03-Oct-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 154
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 08:02 |
Berke and Kubilai??? my two cousins were named Berke and Kubilay
so Kubilay was a christian??? hmm...cousin should change his name(haha ) !
|
|
Scytho-Sarmatian
Earl
Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 290
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 08:07 |
You guys seem to be forgetting that after a couple of generations, the
Mongols of West Asia had converted to Islam. So much for them
being the great champions of Christianity.
Concerning religious issues, the Mongols tended to go whichever way the wind blew.
|
|
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 09:37 |
Kublai wasn't Christian. He was just open-minded. He wasn't Muslim either.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
|
DayI
Sultan
Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2408
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 12:58 |
He whas atheist!
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 13:03 |
Originally posted by Scytho-Sarmatian
You guys seem to be forgetting that after a couple of generations, the Mongols of West Asia had converted to Islam. So much for them being the great champions of Christianity.
Concerning religious issues, the Mongols tended to go whichever way the wind blew.
|
That's right. After death of Great Khans like Mongke, Kublai and Batu their generation had converted to other religion, because
1. The Mongols was few, they need to keep a army. That's why next Mongol Khans generation took religion of their people.
2. They need allies. (Example: Berke allied with Mamluks against House of Batu-Golden Horde).
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 13:09 |
Originally posted by DayI
He whas atheist! |
Kublai Khan wasn't atheist. He was christian and he respected all religion especially buddhism and confucianism. That's why Kublai liked Marco Polo.
Edited by Falco
|
|
tadamson
Baron
Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 21:42 |
Originally posted by Falco
Originally posted by DayI
He whas atheist! |
Kublai Khan wasn't atheist. He was christian and he respected all
religion especially buddhism and confucianism. That's why
Kublai liked Marco Polo. |
The only real evidence states that Khubilai was shammanistic with strong Buddhist leanings, he had Christian wives though.
|
rgds.
Tom..
|
|
Byzantine Emperor
Arch Duke
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios
Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 22:05 |
Originally posted by Maju
So Christians speak bad of Mongols but they are actually like their protectors. Yeap: lucky Christians. |
Actually, the Mongols who became "Christians" were converted by Nestorian missionaries. Nestorianism had long been condemned as a heresy (first for their view that Christ's personalities were split and then for Monophysitism) and they were not recognized by the Roman and Byzantine churches. The ones that converted the Mongols were ancestors of the early Nestorians who had fled the Persian kingdom in the 6th century.
Also, Roman and Byzantine Christians only "spoke bad" about them after they saw the genocide that the Mongols committed in the Muslim world. The popes tried to convert them to Catholicism to no avail; the Byzantines saw the opportunity for an alliance that would protect them from the Ottomans, which worked in the mid-1400's when the sultan Bayezid Ilderim had to lift his siege of Constantinople to meet the attack of Tamerlane back East.
So really, if anything, the Mongols ended up being the "protectors" of Byzantine Christians!
Edited by Byzantine Emperor
|
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 22:59 |
In the 1250s, France's king, Louis IX was concerned about the Holy Land and hoped for an alliance with the Mongols in order to destroy Islam.
|
|
Byzantine Emperor
Arch Duke
Kastrophylax kai Tzaousios
Joined: 24-May-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1800
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Feb-2006 at 23:38 |
Originally posted by Falco
In the 1250s, France's king, Louis IX was concerned about the Holy Land and hoped for an alliance with the Mongols in order to destroy Islam.
|
Yes, this is true! I forgot about Louis IX. I don't think he was successful in forging an alliance, though.
|
|
|
Mameluke
Janissary
Joined: 15-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Feb-2006 at 13:35 |
Ilkhan Hulegu, destroyer of Baghdad, had a Nestorian wife. She had a lot to do with the horrific massacre of Muslims in that city.
Mameluke
|
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
|
|
Leonardo
General
Joined: 13-Jan-2006
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 778
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Feb-2006 at 10:58 |
Originally posted by Mameluke
Ilkhan Hulegu, destroyer of Baghdad, had a Nestorian wife. She had a lot to do with the horrific massacre of Muslims in that city.
Mameluke
|
Baghdad was also saked in 1401 by Tamerlane who was a devout muslim.
|
|
tadamson
Baron
Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Feb-2006 at 11:11 |
Originally posted by Mameluke
Ilkhan Hulegu, destroyer of Baghdad, had a
Nestorian wife. She had a lot to do with the horrific massacre of
Muslims in that city.
Mameluke |
Baghdad had resisted a siege, refused to surrender and had to be taken
by storm. In these circumstances cities were looted, pliiaged etc
and citizens killed or sold into slavery. This was normal across
the world at the time, nothing special or unusual. Nothing to do
with a Nestorian wife..
|
rgds.
Tom..
|
|
ArmenianSurvival
Chieftain
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Feb-2006 at 14:20 |
Originally posted by Falco
Kublai Khan wasn't atheist. He was christian and he respected all
religion especially buddhism and confucianism. That's why Kublai liked
Marco Polo. |
I read that Kublai Khan set the rank of the
profession of Confucian monks one step lower than a prostitute and one
step above a beggar.
"The Mongols directly attacked the Chinese
cultural prejudice that ranked merchants as merely a step above robbers
by officially elevating their status ahead of all religions and
professions, second only to government officials. In a further
degradation of Confucian scholars, the Mongols reduced them from the
highest level of traditional Chinese society to the ninth level, just
below prostitutes but above beggars." -- Genghis Khan and the Making of the Modern World, by Jack Weatherford
I mean, Kublai Khan (like his Mongol
predecessors) didn't persecute people for their religious beliefs, but
I just thought it was worth mentioning.
|
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance
Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
|
|
Mameluke
Janissary
Joined: 15-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Feb-2006 at 09:41 |
Originally posted by tadamson
Originally posted by Mameluke
Ilkhan Hulegu, destroyer of Baghdad, had a Nestorian wife. She had a lot to do with the horrific massacre of Muslims in that city.
Mameluke
|
Baghdad had resisted a siege, refused to surrender and had to be taken by storm. In these circumstances cities were looted, pliiaged etc and citizens killed or sold into slavery. This was normal across the world at the time, nothing special or unusual. Nothing to do with a Nestorian wife..
|
So why were Christians and their churches spared, if she had nothing to do with it?
Mameluke
|
Cry havoc and let slip the dogs of war
|
|
tadamson
Baron
Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Feb-2006 at 10:24 |
Originally posted by Mameluke
Originally posted by tadamson
Originally posted by Mameluke
Ilkhan Hulegu, destroyer of Baghdad, had a Nestorian wife. She had a
lot to do with the horrific massacre of Muslims in that city.
Mameluke
|
Baghdad had resisted a siege, refused to surrender
and had to be taken by storm. In these circumstances cities were
looted, pliiaged etc and citizens killed or sold into slavery.
This was normal across the world at the time, nothing special or
unusual. Nothing to do with a Nestorian wife..
|
So why were Christians and their churches spared, if she had nothing to do with it?
Mameluke |
The patriach had already surrendered. (not that it spared all of them anyhow).
|
rgds.
Tom..
|
|
Akskl
Samurai
Joined: 31-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Feb-2006 at 22:08 |
http://www.nestorian.org/nestorian_timeline.html
1007-1008 Conversion of 200,000 Kerait Turks
http://www.oxuscom.com/timeline.htm
1007-1008 Conversion of 200,000 Kerait Turks to Nestorian Christianity
http://www.religion-online.org/showchapter.asp?title=1553&am p;am p;am p;am p;C=1362 Turkic speaking groups (or tribes) like Kereits, Naimans, Jalairs,
Qongyrats, Onguts (now Waqs or Uaks), Merkits, etc. should not be
called "Mongols". They were Turks in 11-13th centuries, and they are
Kazakh Turks today.
|
|