Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Ancient Chinese Army

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Ancient Chinese Army
    Posted: 23-Dec-2005 at 12:17
Greek Fire, Poison Arrows & Scorpion Bombs: Biological and Chemical Warfare in the Ancient World (Hardcover)
by ADRIENNE MAYOR
 
States that China and India had Greek Fire by 900 AC.
Back to Top
Praetorian View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 190
  Quote Praetorian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 18:40

Well , yes but the Greeks and Romans were the only ones useing Greek Fire that I know off...  Thus name Greek fire!

 

actually the crossbow's not medieval at all, it is in europe, but not in china. The crossbow was around since the Han dynasty.

Well the Romans had them as well

A modern flamethrower? No. A device that spews flames yes.

Actually, the Romans had A modern hand held flamethrower, 2000 years before WW1. They even had Death Rays!



Edited by Praetorian
Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris
--If Caesar were alive, you'd be chained to an oar.

"game over!! man game over!!"
Back to Top
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Jan-2006 at 18:56

"Well , yes but the Greeks and Romans were the only ones useing Greek Fire that I know off...  Thus name Greek fire!"

 

No, the Byzantines were the first to use real Greek fire. Then it's the Indians and Chinese a little bit later, as the book states.

Back to Top
guo hua View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 30-Jul-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote guo hua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Jan-2006 at 02:57
Originally posted by Praetorian


actually the crossbow's not medieval at all, it is in
europe, but not in china. The crossbow was around
since the Han dynasty.


Well the Romans had them as well




Autumm And Spring Period time which is at least
600 years earlier than Han Dynasty, the armies in
China already armed with crossbow. And crossbow
being already used in war of MA LING.

Praetorian, you are very good at distorting history.
Western history can be easily distorted or
speculated because the ancient history of the west
is found on the ruin left by the past.

It is impossible to distort or speculate the history of
China. Ancient history of China, is found on the
record that pass down from the past. And evidence
of the past, still stand even till today.

Western expert, once does not believe or recognised
that there was a Qin empire exists in China,
according to China' thousand of years of continous
historical record. But the recovery of the terrocatte
tomb of Qin ShiHuang in Xi-An has really give them a
mouth shut.

Back to Top
Praetorian View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 190
  Quote Praetorian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Jan-2006 at 18:07

LOL! Dude and how less do you think how we get are history.

Dude I did not say actually the crossbow's not medieval at all, it is in europe, but not in china. The crossbow was around since the Han dynasty. did you see that I quoted!!

Umm dude, western history has many records as well!!

Ever herd of woodchips that the Romans use to rite on! Historians fine them and some still have ink on them. But some do not have ink, because the ink faded away so they take infrared pictures, and you CAN READ WHAT THE ROMANS OR GREEKS OR WHO EVER ROTE ON THEM!!! There are records that are out there to fine, and there ARE records that had bin pass down from the past! ( Why do you think we still have Roman alphabets and we can read Latin!) As for Western experts they too said stuff about the Romans, they thought that the Roman can not main as DEEP as modern mariners until they fond 16 big  Roman WHEELS that went deeper then some modern mariners! (They thought the mineing wheels were a myth. The same they said about the Trojan War and that is a good example how records are passed or survived!).  Dude I can keep going on so Im going to stop. And if I said any thing rong then sorry Im human as well as those Historians experts. But Im rite about them haveing the death rays, crossbows, and hand held flame throwers.

And are you shore the Romans did not have Greek fire?



Edited by Praetorian
Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris
--If Caesar were alive, you'd be chained to an oar.

"game over!! man game over!!"
Back to Top
guo hua View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 30-Jul-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote guo hua Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Jan-2006 at 03:23
Originally posted by Praetorian


Ever herd of woodchipsthat the Romansuse to
rite on! Historians fine them and some still have ink
on them. But some do not have ink, because the ink
faded away so they takeinfrared pictures, and you
CAN READ WHAT THE ROMANS OR GREEKS OR
WHO EVER ROTE ON THEM!!! There are records
that are out there to fine, and there ARE records that
had bin pass down from the past! ( Why do you think
we still have Roman alphabets and we can read
Latin!) As for Western experts they too said stuff
about the Romans, they thought that the Roman can
not main as DEEP as modern mariners until they
fond 16 big Roman WHEELS that went deeper then
some modern mariners!




Latin is a Roman creation!?

I ensure you that there are more people know about
Han script than Roman script.

Is the record reliable enough where the civilisation
was overrun by other civilisation for several times?
Back to Top
Omnipotence View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 16-Nov-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 494
  Quote Omnipotence Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Jan-2006 at 21:18

Dude I did not say actually the crossbow's not medieval at all, it is in europe, but not in china. The crossbow was around since the Han dynasty. did you see that I quoted!!

 

The first sentence of crossbows not being in China is blatantly wrong. As for the second sentence, crossbows were around since the late Spring and Autumn, not the Han dynasty.

 

And are you shore the Romans did not have Greek fire?

 

What's all this about how great Rome is? Greek fire was invented by the Byzantine empire. You're getting a little too excited when you said Romans had death rays . They did use mirrors to burn ships(actually that's the Greeks).



Edited by Omnipotence
Back to Top
Sino Defender View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 23-Jan-2006
Location: Hong Kong
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 413
  Quote Sino Defender Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Jan-2006 at 07:40
and just for your knowledge, spring and autumn started in 770 bc until around 440 bc.
"Whoever messes with the heavenly middle kingdom, no matter how far s/he escapes, s/he is to be slaughtered"
Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 19:09

Rome had a crossbow called a Gatastraphae but it really wasnt very effective thus the romans dont mention it in battle often.

Other ancient chinese weapons include Giant crossbow,trebuchets,Mustard gas.

Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Jan-2006 at 19:11
Posion arrows have always been used in china too
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Mar-2006 at 01:48
Originally posted by dej2

Military formations of ancient China.

Ancient means Qin and Han Dynasty? How come I didn't notice any Cavalry (I just see Chariots and Infantry). Very cool graphic!

I've been scouring the web for historical/ancient Chinese Army information (uniforms,  Army/troop structures, troop types/weapons, high level military history etc.) so I'm considered "green" when it comes to learning my cultural roots! So much Chinese/(East) Asian history I don't and didn't know! Learning a lot here!

In fact, most of the info on historical Chinese Army uniforms I found here(thanks to Poirot (....and courtesy of Ospray?)!

Anyway, I'm more into wargaming miniatures painting/collecting, not so much as a historian so I'm just searching for general knowledge to add a certain level of authenticity. I realised that there isn't so much popularity/information on historical chinese armies as compared to say the Romans, Greeks, Alexander the Great, Napoleonics(huge wargaming base!), European Medieval knights(one of most popular), American Civil War, American Independance War, Musketeers and the very famous Mongol campaigns/invasions (high awareness level in Western countries as evidenced by the number of miniature collections) as compared to Chinese Armies! To most people, the most that comes to mind about Chinese forces are:

-  the "Chinese Boxer Rebellion"(due to no small part of western military involvement of course)

- Marco Polo's visits to China;

- Qin Dynasty (first empire);

I hope that the historical Chinese military history will be more publicised and more knowledge will be "unearthed" (like the fantastic "Terracotta Warriors") just like any mighty army in the ancient/medieval world!

But I wonder for the "Rectangle formation" :

1.what does "...exaggerate power" mean? If one were to stand on same level, one cannot see the soldiers behind unless we were to stand on a higher ground, say a hill etc. It only projects (if that's what's meant with "exaggerate", or did they mean "under exaggerate"?)

2."Less soldiers in centre"...what benefit is that? I can only think of "under exxagerate" or deceive the enemy (ie.show less troops than what you got).

Hehe...and by the way, my first post! (will update a little about myself in introduction section later, if got such section).

For now: Hello everyone and nice to meet you!



Edited by Chinese Soldier
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Mar-2006 at 13:38
I think exaggerate, may mean that the front ranks are sholder to sholder. Rather than bing columned.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Mar-2006 at 22:33
Oh I think I see the meaning... no gaps between the troops (ie.no "columns"), so shows like a continous front line of soldiers, like a large united front!
Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Mar-2006 at 21:31
not sure we can take the terracotta army as an accurate depiction of Qin army ,as its is quite clear that this formation is a Unorthodox(see sun tzu) formation of the qin army and not a Holding/main melee(orthodox) formation of the qin army,Its more likely that it is a Vangaurd of the Qin army built for breaking up the enemys formation,or a flanking type formation.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Mar-2006 at 19:30
Ten Deployments

Sun Pin the great grandson of Sun Tzu, also an accomplished Military Strategist, wrote a book called Military Methods. Chapter 16 is called Ten Deployments

In General, there are ten deployments: square, circular, diffuse, concentrated, Awl, Wild Geese, Hooked, Dark Rising, incendiary, and aquatic. Each of them has its advantages:
        The square deployment is for cutting.
        The circular deployment is for unifying.
        The diffuse deployment is for rapid flexible response.
        The concentrated deployment is to prevent being cut off and taken.
        Awl Formation is for decisively severing the enemy.
        Wild Geese Formation is for exchanging archery fire.
        Hooked Formation is the means by which to change targets and alter plans.
        Dark Rising deployment is for causing doubts in the enemys masses and difficulty for his plans.
        Incendiary deployment is the means to seize enemy encampments.
        Aquatic deployment is the means to inundate the solid.
Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Mar-2006 at 00:56

 "Aquatic deployment is the means to inundate the solid" any more info on this formatation.

+ What formatation does the terracotta army use.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Mar-2006 at 13:46

Unfortunately the details are not clear on the definitions of all the formations. My source is Ralph Sawyers book "The Complete Art of War" which includes the works of Sun Tzu and Sun Bin.

China has some fairly large rivers, the Yellow and the Yangtz, I'm assuming that the reference may be directed twords a specialized marine fighting division of the army. Maybe not a actual formation that was used by deploying troops on land? (still just speculation)

Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Mar-2006 at 17:15

No i think it means a formatation which is used to dissolve a solid formation ,thats why its called Aqautic because like water it dissolves solid objects ,its most likely a skirmishg formatation in order to disorganize the solid formatation of the enemy.

 "Aquatic deployment is the means to inundate the solid"

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2006 at 17:38
Originally posted by babyblue

Originally posted by Tobodai

lol Im just kidding, China has invented alot of great war stuff like gunpowder, trebuchets, crossbow etc etc, but this was more medieval then ancient so I dont think it applies to this thread so much.

actually the crossbow's not  medieval at all, it is in europe, but not in china. The crossbow was around since the Han dynasty.

 
You are wrong, the crossbow was around since the Warring states
Back to Top
BigL View Drop Down
General
General


Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
  Quote BigL Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2006 at 17:52
Noince spring and autumn period
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.039 seconds.