Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Jalair
Janissary
Joined: 06-Nov-2007
Location: Kenya
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Topic: Hazara and Pan-Turk Posted: 05-Jan-2008 at 20:34 |
There is a book by Prof Shah Ali Akbar Shahristani about Turkic-Mongol words in current Hazaragi published 1980s in Kabul. The book is not available online but it could worth having it online.
I remember an article published in "Farhange Mardom" or Folklor in Kabul (? late 1970s) translated about Hazara people, there the researcher a Swedish orientalist, mentions interviewing some peopel who speak Mongol-Turkic. The original article was published many years ago perhaps 50s or 60s.I do not remeber the author and the translatore name ( ?not sure perhaps Rawan Farhadi).
|
Zarra
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
khutulun
Janissary
Joined: 22-Nov-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 05-Jan-2008 at 17:20 |
Naiman, it would be AWESOME if you could post some of those old Hazaragi poems here so that others can look at them as well...if you still have access.
To the ear, Hazaragi is intelligible by other Persian speakers, I am wondering how much Turco-Mongol influence the language has (if you have run across a study of the language at all or just from personal observation)?
Persian languages are very beautiful, but I can't imagine a large group adopting (and abandoning their own mother tongue for) a foreign language simply based on a love for the language. There had to be some outside impetus, if the original inhabitants of Hazarajat were indeed Altaic.
One more thing. Can you tell me more about the Turkic tribe labled Turkoman? What relation, if any, do they have with Turkmen? From what I've gathered from a Hazara of the Turkoman tribe, their oral traditions point to a Turkmen mother and a Hazara father...
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Naimani
Housecarl
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
|
Posted: 05-Jan-2008 at 08:43 |
Originally posted by khutulun
Originally posted by Naimani
[QUOTE=khutulun]
Why do Hazaras speak Hazaragi?
My tribe, the Naimans spoke Khalkh Mongol till 18th century. My gandpa could sing folk Naiman songs till a few years ago. But the reason why Hazara people speak Hazaragi instead of Turkic like Uzbeks, or Mongolian is because Hazaras are not one single tribe, with one single language to communicate. There are many clans in Hazara tribe.
|
Thank you for the info Naiman, but I don't think it answers my question. You listed the Hazara tribes, half of whom are Mongol and the other Turk. Why would they adopt a foreign language rather than make up a hybrid of both their languages...or just use the one that was most common? At what point did Hazaras start speaking Hazaragi (a dialect of Persian)? |
They started speaking Hazaragi during and after the Ilkhaanid Hazaras. Just like the Moghuls of India and Osmani Turks, Ilkhaanids loved Farsi language and poetry. That could be a reason too.
I understand what you mean by making a hybrid of both languages(khalkha mongol and turkic) but it would've been too hard, may be even impossible at that time to make such a language. Considering they all could already speak Farsi they had no difficulty to communicate with each other.
But the Hazaragi dailect of Farsi at that time was mostly Turkic and Mongol, with just some Farsi words and the grammer used was Farsi too. Slowly they started using more and more Farsi words. I tried reading old Hazaragi poems, I didnt understand 80% of it. The only words I undestood were simple words such as 'is' 'was' and etc, the rest are old Turkic and Mongol.
Edited by Naimani - 05-Jan-2008 at 08:49
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
khutulun
Janissary
Joined: 22-Nov-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 05-Jan-2008 at 06:58 |
Originally posted by Naimani
[QUOTE=khutulun]
Why do Hazaras speak Hazaragi?
My tribe, the Naimans spoke Khalkh Mongol till 18th century. My gandpa could sing folk Naiman songs till a few years ago. But the reason why Hazara people speak Hazaragi instead of Turkic like Uzbeks, or Mongolian is because Hazaras are not one single tribe, with one single language to communicate. There are many clans in Hazara tribe.
|
Thank you for the info Naiman, but I don't think it answers my question. You listed the Hazara tribes, half of whom are Mongol and the other Turk. Why would they adopt a foreign language rather than make up a hybrid of both their languages...or just use the one that was most common? At what point did Hazaras start speaking Hazaragi (a dialect of Persian)?
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Afghanan
Chieftain
Durr e Durran
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1098
|
Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 22:55 |
I have a few books on Central Asian history. I have the Encycolopedia of Afghanistan, History of Civilizations - Central Asia Volumes I-VI, Hudud al Alam, The Empire of the Steppes, Indo-Europeans, Early Empires of Central Asia, In Search of the Indo-Europeans, and NONE of them mention any Turkics 2500 years ago in Afghanistan. IF there was any, some archaeological evidence would show their existence.
Unless you consider the Huns (who pushed the Yu-Chi (Tocharians) out of the Tarim Basin), and Saka (Scythians) (culturally speaking) who preceded them, I'm not sure where this book you mention gets its information from.
According to wkipedia, the Turkic migrations occurred during the Medieval period, which is roughly 5th century to 14th century.
Edited by Afghanan - 28-Dec-2007 at 23:01
|
The perceptive man is he who knows about himself, for in self-knowledge and insight lays knowledge of the holiest.
~ Khushal Khan Khattak
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Naimani
Housecarl
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
|
Posted: 28-Dec-2007 at 12:18 |
Originally posted by Afghanan
Jaghuri tribes and Uyghurs were part of the Ak Hun Empire. They moved down to Hindu-Kush mountains of Afghanistan around 2000 years ago. |
Although there were Turks in Afghanistan up until the time of the White Huns. More Turkics moved in after the Iranian Shers of Bamian were removed from power... I did not recall any Turkic tribes moving into Afghanistan 2,000 years ago. Please elaborate. |
Hi Afghanan!
I'm not saying exactly 2000 years ago. But it was before the Kushans. You are Afghan, so I recommend you to read the Persian book called "Dairat-ul-Taarikh", its an old Farsi book that explains Afghanistan and Iran history in debth. From the Huns to Temur. Its a useful source to read.
We all know that there were migrations of Altaic nomads from the north to the rest of Central Asia, and other parts such as East. So its highly possible to find out that Turks existed in Central Afghanistan even before 2500 years ago. But Jaghuri clans moved in a bit later, around 2300-2000 years ago. Because I know that Jaghuri clans were under Touman, and later under his son, Mete Khaan. They were not one of the major tribes because of their smaller population compared to the other tribes such as Ting-lings, Hsien-pei, Hego and ancient Qirghiz tribes and etc. The reason is because they were divided into four smaller clans instead of one, whereas other tribes were together. This book also mentions that at that time there were already Indo-European people (possibly Asian-Aryan's ancestrs such as Iranic tribes) in Central Asia too.
I think that civilisation in Bamiyan began with the first migration of Turkic tribes from the North. And I have not noticed the name "Shers of Bamiyan" in any text. Can you please tell us briefly about the Shers of Bamiyan?
Cheerz
Edited by Naimani - 28-Dec-2007 at 12:20
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Afghanan
Chieftain
Durr e Durran
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1098
|
Posted: 27-Dec-2007 at 20:51 |
Jaghuri tribes and Uyghurs were part of the Ak Hun Empire. They moved down to Hindu-Kush mountains of Afghanistan around 2000 years ago. |
Although there were Turks in Afghanistan up until the time of the White Huns. More Turkics moved in after the Iranian Shers of Bamian were removed from power... I did not recall any Turkic tribes moving into Afghanistan 2,000 years ago. Please elaborate.
Edited by Afghanan - 27-Dec-2007 at 20:52
|
The perceptive man is he who knows about himself, for in self-knowledge and insight lays knowledge of the holiest.
~ Khushal Khan Khattak
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Naimani
Housecarl
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
|
Posted: 27-Dec-2007 at 11:36 |
Originally posted by khutulun
What do Hazaras consider themselves? I've always had the impression they consider themselves 'Mongol,' though I have come across Hazaras whose 'tribe' claim Mongol and Turk ancestry based on their oral traditions.
My question:
How did a LARGE group such as the Hazaras, who are unmistakeably of either Turk or Mongol (or mixture of both) descent, are/were concentrated (mostly) in one large area with the rulers of the area, until recently, being mostly Turco-Mongol end up adopting a language (Persian) that would be 'foreign' to them?
My observation:
Hazaras look similiar to Turkic peoples of the region (though as a group, they look possibly a degree more Mongoloid...if that makes sense), the women wear dresses in style that are similiar to the Pashtun (Kuchi) Nomads (embroidered chest, round skirts,pleated pants) though the colors used are vastly different, the jewelry and outter coat (Chappan) are exactly the style of Turkic peoples of the region, the language is a dialect of farsi with a smattering of turkic/Mongol words (Apa = Mother, Ata = Father). I haven't read/seen anything on the culture, and most Hazaras are Shia.
Sorry if my question goes off-topic. |
Dear Khutulun!
Why do Hazaras speak Hazaragi?
My tribe, the Naimans spoke Khalkh Mongol till 18th century. My gandpa could sing folk Naiman songs till a few years ago. But the reason why Hazara people speak Hazaragi instead of Turkic like Uzbeks, or Mongolian is because Hazaras are not one single tribe, with one single language to communicate. There are many clans in Hazara tribe.
There are:
Besud - Mongol (Chinggis Khaan was a Borchegen Besud too)
Naiman - Mongol
Dai-Zangies - Mongol
Dai-Kundies - Mongol
Jaghuries - Turkic
Turkomans - Turkic
Tatars - Turkic
Aimaq - Turkic
They already had learnt Persian during the Ilkhaanid Hazara Mongols. And exactly thats when the language 'Hazaragi' started being used by the Hazaras. They found it easier to communicate in 'Hazaragi' because they could already speak it. But no tribe could speak Persian fluently, so they started using many Turkic and Mongol words in Hazaragi.
Glad to see that you are interested in Hazara history and origin. It is not as complicated as the writers make it. You are right we are Turk and Mongol mixed. But Aimaq Hazaras are too Persian now. One thing we should keep in mind that the name 'Hazara' was put on us during the Mongol Empire in the 13th century. So if you read history before the 13th Century you won't find any info about Hazaras. Because the name Hazara did not exist. But its not true to say that Hazaras 'people' didnt exists too. Hazara history is very simple if you divide their history into two stages:
1- Pre-Mongol Empire period:
In todays Hazarjat there is a place called 'Jaghuri'. People who live there are called Jaghuries. But there are actually four different clans living there. I don't exactly know their clan names but they date back to the Xiongnu Empire and Ak Huns. Jaghuri tribes and Uyghurs were part of the Ak Hun Empire. They moved down to Hindu-Kush mountains of Afghanistan around 2000 years ago.
If you read the "Secret History of the Mongols" it says that when the Great Mongolian warriors lead by Chinggis Khaans grandson reached Bamiyan, they faced a great challenge from the opponents who looked the same as the Mongol soldiers. They were surprised! This proved that those tribes existed long before the other Hazaras, such as the Ilkhaanids and Northern Hazara such as the Chaghataians.
2- After the Mongol Empire:
Hazara population grew very rapidly during the Mongol Empire. But when the Ilkhaanids lost, after the defeated soldiers returned to Hazarajat, the population stopped growing.
Here is a useful youtube link:
I am sorry for my messy writing, I'm in a hurry, but I hope its not as confusing as I think it is.
~Peace
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
khutulun
Janissary
Joined: 22-Nov-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 27-Dec-2007 at 06:05 |
What do Hazaras consider themselves? I've always had the impression they consider themselves 'Mongol,' though I have come across Hazaras whose 'tribe' claim Mongol and Turk ancestry based on their oral traditions.
My question:
How did a LARGE group such as the Hazaras, who are unmistakeably of either Turk or Mongol (or mixture of both) descent, are/were concentrated (mostly) in one large area with the rulers of the area, until recently, being mostly Turco-Mongol end up adopting a language (Persian) that would be 'foreign' to them?
My observation:
Hazaras look similiar to Turkic peoples of the region (though as a group, they look possibly a degree more Mongoloid...if that makes sense), the women wear dresses in style that are similiar to the Pashtun (Kuchi) Nomads (embroidered chest, round skirts,pleated pants) though the colors used are vastly different, the jewelry and outter coat (Chappan) are exactly the style of Turkic peoples of the region, the language is a dialect of farsi with a smattering of turkic/Mongol words (Apa = Mother, Ata = Father). I haven't read/seen anything on the culture, and most Hazaras are Shia.
Sorry if my question goes off-topic.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Jalair
Janissary
Joined: 06-Nov-2007
Location: Kenya
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 16-Dec-2007 at 20:26 |
Any link for the list? The list is comprised of Turkic and Mongol tribes, in fact most of them seems to be Turkic. Some of the tribes mentioned in the list are listed with Turkmen or Uzbek, currently we can find in Afghanistan. Here are some of them but there might be more:
Jalair Jalair
Hatagin Qataghan
eljigin Alchin
bayaud Baymaut
Onkhod Ongut
Khereid Kerait
NAIMAN Naiman
Merged Merket
Uigar Uighur
Khirgis Qirghiz
Khasag Qazaq
Kharchin Qarqin
Khibchag qipchaq Ujeed Jeed Khitad Khitai
Bulagachid bolaghichi
Uzuun Uishun
Echeed Jeed
Khuluud Khalaut
Tele Telew
Baarin Bakhrin
Saljud Chiljiut uush Uz
Tatar Tatar
Tuuhai Tumai
Usun Yuishun
khurlad Gurlat
barlas Barlas
Urad Uirat
yamaat Yamood
|
Zarra
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Naimani
Housecarl
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 36
|
Posted: 09-Jul-2007 at 22:47 |
Originally posted by Great Kushan
Originally posted by mamikon
what ![Confused](smileys/smiley5.gif)
do you have any evidence behind the claim that Pashtuns shaved Buddha's face?
|
I have a very clear evidence that the Bamiyan budddah has been destroyed little by little in the last 200 years since Pashtun come to power in Afghanistan. before 200 years it was a complete buddah body statue.
|
^I thought everyone knew that.
I'm a Naiman Hazara, therefore I'm a Hazara too. I think we are more Mongoloid than Turkic now. Before the Great Mongol Empire, our ancestors were more Turks than Mongols in Hazarstan regions. But it was after the Mongol Empire when we became known as the 'Hazaras'. You guys know that the Mongol Empire was divided into four states. Hazaras are from the Chaghatai and Ilkhanates of Afghanistan and Iran.
Hazara acestors lived in Central Afghanistan for more than 2000 years. Kushans are also our Turkic ancestors. The reason why some people say that they were Indo-European is because they had many races in their army and government, they even had black looking people possibly Indians. But the high ranked Kushans were Kushan Turks who built the Buddhas of Bamiyan.
The Turanian armies kept increasing our numbers. Specially during and after the Great Mongolian Empire Hazara population became larger and larger. When our Mongol ancestors completely lost power, the defeted soldiers from Iran, Iraq and other cities returned to Hazarstan/Hazarajat.
An interesting fact is that some of our Hazara sub-clans are still called by their old names. For example Naiman, Besud and etc...Today if you go in Mongolia or Kazakhistan you can find many communities (tribes) who have the same names, but they are separated by small communities everywhere in Mongolia and Kazakhsiatn. Here are only some of the Kahlkh-Mongol tribes that exist in Mongolia:
1.Borjigon 2.Besud 3.Jalair 4.Hatagin 5.Olkhonud 6.Harnut 7.eljigin 8.bayaud 9.gorlos 10.darhad 11.Sharnud 12.Uriankhan 13.Chinos 14.Onkhod 15.Mangud 16.Torguud 17.Khereid 18.NAIMAN 19.Merged 20.Khibchag 21.SARTUUL 22.Tangud 23.Bashigad 24.Khirgis 25.Khasag 26.Uigar 27.Kharchin 28.Uuld 29.Ujeed 30.Jongoor 31.Khotogoid 32.Avga 33.Tugchin 34.Guchid 35.Khorchin 36.Khitad 38.Asud 39.Baatud 40.Barnud 41.Khuuchid 42.Khalbagad 43.Khangad 44.Jarangiinkhan 45.Togoruutan 46.Khard 47.Khorkhoi nudten 48.Buurluud 49.Khavchig 50.Bulagachid 51.Gozuul 52.Uzuun 53.Echeed 54.Khavkhchin 55.Orovgod 56.Tavnag 57.Khaakhar 57.Khunguud 58.Burged 59.Khuitserleg 60.Chutsuut 61.Ulanguud 62.Ezen 63.Undgaa 64.Gahan 65.Aksakal 67.Zuun shuvuuchin 68.Zaaruud 69.Dalandaganad 70.Tsagaan zel 71.Khar zel 72.Khariad 73.Daartan 74.Barchuul 75.Gerchuud 76.Baachuud 77.Buuchuud 78.Khuluud 79.Basigid 80.Tsookhor 81.Khiitluud 82.Gal 83.Motoi 84.Tele 85.Sood 86.Mankhilag 87.Khamnigan 88.Taijiud 89.Tsakhar 90.Soloon 91.Khoid 92.barga 93.Tsoros 94.Talas 95.Baarin 96.Alag aduun 97.Saljud 98.Uvashi 99.Uneged 100.Asan(esen) 101.Uuhan 102.uush 103.Tsoor 104.Jalaid 105.Zaisanguud 106.Zurchid 107.Sunid 108.Tatar 109.Tuuhai 110.Usun 111.khalkha 112.khandgai 113.khangin 114.Khiad 115.Khoton 116.khurlad 117.Tsagaan 118.Nirun 119.durved 120.baatar 121.Zelme 122.Tuved 123.Tavuud 124.Khoshuud 125.barlas 126.Urad 127.yamaat
As you can see there are Naimans and Besuds still in Mongolia. But in Hazarajat/Hazarstan areas today we also have Turkomens which were called Oghuz Turks in the ancient times. Also we have 'Jaghuries' who are the biggest the most ancient Hazara sub-clan. They were mainly Uyghur Turks, but after Oltan Khaan their name changed to 'Jaghuri'. They were good fighters, hard workers and also good horse riders. The name 'Jaghuri' is derived from the word 'Chau Quri' or 'Jau Quri' which was a position given to a direct ancestor of Chinggis Khaan who had to lead 100 Mongol soldiers, during Oltan Khaan. That's when they became known as Jaghuri people.
If we look back in the past, we don't see many differences between Mongols and Turks. They had same believes and culture. But Turks today specially Turks in Turkey, because of their geographical location, they tend to be more European and Middle-Eastern. We have Turks and Mongols in our Hazara tribe, we don't see any differences. I think the reason is because we give more value to the name 'Hazara' more than the smaller names such as jaghuri, Besud, Naiman, Turkoman and etc...
If you look at the any ancient sources, you cannot find the name 'Hazara' before the Mongol Empire. The reason is because they became known as the 'Hazara' during and after the Empire. Before that they were called buy different names. My point is that the people who are called Hazara today have more than 2000 years of history in Central Afghanistan. We are the Mongols and the ancient Turks of Afghanistan.
Edited by Naimani - 09-Jul-2007 at 23:08
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Afghanan
Chieftain
Durr e Durran
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1098
|
Posted: 01-Jul-2007 at 22:35 |
Here is a quick summary of events from the Kushans to the
Muslim conquest.
As for the Kushans, they are remnants of the Greater Yue-Chih, or the Tocharians. They were not Mongols, but Eastern Iranian speaking nomads from China who were pushed out of their ancestral homes by the Huns. They were followed by other Scythian nomads who were also fleeing the Huns and eventually swept over the Semi Hellenic city states in Afghanistan and made their empire there. They converted to Buddhism and were responsible for many of the caves that are in "Gharchistan" or Bamian.
They were defeated and swept over the Kitharites (Huns) and then finally by the Ephtalite Huns. The Ephtalite Huns have a mysterious past but are said to be remnants of the Tocharians and had cultural traditions similar to the Massagatae Saka. They ruled Afghanistan and eventually converted to Buddhism and Hinduism. Hinduism eventually won out in Eastern Afghanistan and Peshawar and Taxila, but Buddhism was still strong in Bamian where the Buddhist monk went to visit and noticed the Giant Buddha Statues.
The Ephtalites had various wars with the Sassanian Persians and Turks, some of which they won, some of which they lost, but eventually they were overrun by a joint Turk-Sassanian attack and were dispersed.
--
Most of the information is from History of Central Asia, compied by UNESCO and historical departments from various universites across Central Asia, South Asia, and Europe.
|
The perceptive man is he who knows about himself, for in self-knowledge and insight lays knowledge of the holiest.
~ Khushal Khan Khattak
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Afghanan
Chieftain
Durr e Durran
Joined: 12-Jun-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1098
|
Posted: 01-Jul-2007 at 22:16 |
I would just like to clarify. The Buddha statues were not built during the reign of the Kushans, but the Ephtalites..who were ironically anti-Buddhists initially.
The Mongols killed every living being in Bamian, including, dogs and cats and lined their heads up in mounds.
The Hazaras are said to be descendants of the Mongol armies, not Genghis Khan. The Mongol armies were made up of many different Turkic tribes as well as Mongols. Bamian was setup as a garrison town for the Mongols and when the Mongols were eventually amalgamated with the rest of Persia and Central Asia, the Mongol hordes remained in Bamian, where they eventually converted to Shiite Islam.
Genetic studies have proven that they have Mongolian and Turkic ancestry. Hazaras today are prevalent in every city in Afghanistan and have intermarried with every ethnic group. My mother's grandmother infact, was a Hazara from Ghazni.
|
The perceptive man is he who knows about himself, for in self-knowledge and insight lays knowledge of the holiest.
~ Khushal Khan Khattak
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
barbar
General
retired AE Moderator
Joined: 10-Aug-2005
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 781
|
Posted: 30-Jun-2007 at 17:49 |
Originally posted by AFG-PaShTuN
By the way, to clear your confusion, Kushans werent' Hazara, the Buddhas weren't built by Hazara, they were built by the Kushans, an Aryan Tribe that assimilated with the rest of the Aryanic Tribes, collectively known as Pashtuns or ethnic Afghans.
Peace
|
Who are Hazaras then? Did the Mongol troups come with their wives to this land, and killed all the locals?
|
Either make a history or become a history.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
AFG-PaShTuN
Samurai
Joined: 03-Sep-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Posted: 30-Jun-2007 at 07:00 |
Man we've had enough of your childish complaints, you, Hazaras, and the rest of your comrades, Tajiks, Uzbeks and all put all the blmae on us Pashtuns for wahetever situation you guys are in right now, Grow up, read history, Afghanistan had never been damaged that severely as it was by the ancestors of the Hazara people [Mongols], you guys shouldn't even complain, our cities were razed to grounds by your people, we don't say nothing, but every forum i go to, i see the BS by you guys about us Pashtuns, as if we are the only devils and wrong doers in Afghanistan.
By the way, to clear your confusion, Kushans werent' Hazara, the Buddhas weren't built by Hazara, they were built by the Kushans, an Aryan Tribe that assimilated with the rest of the Aryanic Tribes, collectively known as Pashtuns or ethnic Afghans.
Peace
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
barbar
General
retired AE Moderator
Joined: 10-Aug-2005
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 781
|
Posted: 08-Dec-2006 at 01:21 |
Originally posted by Maziar
Yes, the Yuechi Tocharinas were Indo-europeans, but not iranic. Hazaras was first time migrated to Afghanistan at the 12th century, and they are not the descendants of Kushans. |
Maziar, can we say Iranians are not the decendants of the early locals of Iran before Aryan migration? if a group of people migrate into a place they definately mix with the locals, if both parts are quite significant, we can find clear genetic and cultural elements from both parts (in the case of Hazara), then how can we exclude any of them from their ancestral line?
|
Either make a history or become a history.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
explorer6
Janissary
Joined: 03-Nov-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 30-Nov-2006 at 14:28 |
Kushans were Buddhists whose admistrative writings were in Prakrit and
who translated religious texts into Sanskrit. Nobody knows for
sure what language they spoke in Central Asia. Some of their coins had
Greek inscriptions and pics of Greek gods.
Voice of the Ancestors
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
gok_toruk
Arch Duke
9 Oghuz
Joined: 28-Apr-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1831
|
Posted: 30-Nov-2006 at 06:59 |
'Dated Kushana Inscriptions, Satya Shrava'
'The Armies of Bactria , Valerii.P.Nikonorov'
The name Kushan is derived from the term Guishang, used in Chinese historical writings to describe one branch of the nomadic people, called Yuezhi or Yuechi. These nomads who were of Indo-European stock, roamed the northwestern China but during 176-160 BC, they were driven west by another group, the Xiongnu
There is evidence both from the mummies and Chinese writings that many of them had blonde or red hair and blue eyes, characteristics also found in present-day Afghanistan, Pakistan, Tajikistan and Central Asia, due to the populations' high genetic diversity. This suggests the possibility that they were part of an early migration of speakers of Eastern Irannic Languages.
By the way, a normal Hazara is a good example of the Northern Mongoloid population. Ofcourse, for instance, they grew more facial hair than Central Asians, but they're, to a very high degree and uniformly Mongoloid.
Edited by gok_toruk - 30-Nov-2006 at 07:04
|
Sajaja bramani totari ta, raitata raitata, radu ridu raitata, rota.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Guests
Guest
|
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 19:05 |
Hazara people lived in feudalism system until one hundred years ago. Hazara people has long history of living in mud built houses in villages. Hazara people has long history of agriculture and tradations.
I have not read anymore to say Hazara people were nomadic.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
oghuzkb
Samurai
Joined: 21-May-2005
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 117
|
Posted: 27-Nov-2006 at 04:41 |
Originally posted by Maziar
Yes, the Yuechi Tocharinas were Indo-europeans, but not iranic. Hazaras was first time migrated to Afghanistan at the 12th century, and they are not the descendants of Kushans. |
Well, if so, where did they migrate from?
|
ALLAH gave us two books---Quran and Nature. ---Jamaliddin Efghany
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |