Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Spanish inventors and scientists

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>
Author
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Spanish inventors and scientists
    Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 12:09
The famous "black legend" of Spain is a cartoon of the real history of modern Spain.
The legend proclaim that Spain was cruel, stupid and a failure after all. It seems all the purpose of Spain in life it was to lost in its war against Englad, to leave open the doors for a more progressive British Empire.
 
Spain is described as a place that lacked creativity except in arts and literature. Many people admire Spanish painters as Goya, or Spanish writers as Cervantes, but not a single scientist or schollar is usually remember by anyone; except by experts.
 
Well, that legend has been so persuasive that even Spaniards and Hispanics themselves have believed so for so long that Spain lacked creativity. That was a sterile place for progress.
 
This thread will be to discuss about the Spanish inventors and scientists that contributed to the progress of mankind. I hope to put a post for each one. For now, let me just show a list of some of the most prominent:
 
Miguel de Servet, discoverer of the circulation of blood.
Juan Roget, inventor of the telescope.
Jeronimo Ayanz, earliest steam machine and air conditioners.
Narciso Monturiol, inventor of the first autonomous submarine
Isaac Peral, inventor of an advanced submarine
Leonardo Torres Quevedo, inventor of advanced calculating machines
Juan de la Cierva, inventor of the helicopter's transmission.
Santiago Ramon y Cajal, discoverer of the neurons.
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 15:03
pinguin,
 
It might be an interesting discussion, but frankly I never have heard of any of these people.  Why not do some background investigation and make your opinions known?
 
Incidentally, I think the "Black Legend" had died before all those Elizabethan era movies Hollywood made before WW II....they resurrected the legend's popularity, maybe influenced by what was going on in Spain, '36 to '39.  Wink
 
 


Edited by pikeshot1600 - 21-Feb-2009 at 15:05
Back to Top
Reginmund View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke


Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
  Quote Reginmund Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 17:15
Some say Cervantes was the inventor of the European novel.
Back to Top
faram View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl
Avatar

Joined: 28-Aug-2004
Location: Spain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 38
  Quote faram Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 18:50
In my opinion, the problem is not just the "Black legend", it is the "Nationalistic Legend" that makes us to think that the nationals of some countries are good for some things and bad for other. Nationality has nothing to do with ability to invention or artistic talent...

Spain had historically being a low-industrialized country, so it's normal that there were not so many Spanish inventors than English or American ones. Moreover, being other countries the focus of industrialization Spanish inventions have had a lesser world repercution.
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 21:41

Originally posted by pinguin

The legend proclaim that Spain was cruel, stupid and a failure after all. It seems all the purpose of Spain in life it was to lost in its war against Englad, to leave open the doors for a more progressive British Empire.

I think the Spanish Empire, at its height, was less progressive than the British Empire, at its height; but that's perfectly normal, since we're talking about two entirely different time periods. The height of the British Empire was probably the Victorian era, which covers from the 1830s to 1900, whereas the height of the Spanish Empire was probably in the mid-1700s under Charles III. It's an unfair and often anachronistic comparison.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Feb-2009 at 23:30
To be fair, the people that recognized Spanish inventors and scientists the less were Spaniards themselves. While in Britain certain innovators had the help and support of the whole society, in Spain they were usually seen as lunatics, and their inventions forgotten.
Spain paid a high price because of that attitude. During the 1898 Spanish-American war, for example, where the U.S. wipe out the Spanish Empire and Spain lost Cuba, Puerto Rico and Phillipines, if Spain have developed a fleet of submarines in the Peral's model, the outcome of the war could have been different. But Spain wasn't much interested in innovations but only in preserving the status quo. The Spanish-American war was the the start of a deep decline in Spain, which ended in the Spanish Civil war.
 
Well, let's start then with the list. Miguel de Servet, known in English as Michael Servetus
 
 
 
Michael Servetus (also Miguel Servet or Miguel Serveto; 29 September 1511 – 27 October 1553) was a Spanish (Aragonese) theologian, physician, cartographer, and humanist and the first European to describe the function of pulmonary circulation. His interests included many sciences: astronomy and meteorology; geography, jurisprudence, study of the Bible, mathematics, anatomy, and medicine. He is renowned in the history of several of these fields, particularly medicine and theology. He participated in the Protestant Reformation, and later developed a nontrinitarian Christology. Condemned by Catholics and Protestants alike, he was burnt at the stake by order of the Protestant Geneva governing council as a heretic.
 
More about him on here:
 
And about his discovery of circulation of blood
 
 
The “Christianismi Restitutio” (the “Restoration of Christianity”) (1553) contains the first written description in Western Europe of the minor circulation of blood (i.e. the route of the blood from the heart to the lungs and viceversa). Those who wonder why this scientific discovery is contained in a theological book, they can find the answer in the nature of the system of thought of Servetus. As a son of the Renaissance, Servetus considered that theology, medicine, philosophy and the rest of sciences were not separated compartments, but interrelated sciences that allowed men to understand the Universe as a whole.
 
"The divine spirit is found in the blood and is in itself the blood or the blood spirit. It is not that the divine spirit is found mainly in the walls of the heart or in the parenchyma of the liver or brain, but in the blood, as God himself taught us in Genesis. 9; Leviathan. 7 and Deutenonomium. 12.” (Christianismi Restitutio, p. 170).
 
 

Servetus explained that:

“The vital spirit has its origin in the left ventricle of the heart, and the lungs contribute mostly to its production. It is produced in the lungs when the air inhaled is combined with the elaborated subtle blood that the right ventricle of the heart transmits to the left. But this communication does not take place through the middle wall of the heart as it is usually believed, but rather, by means of a great contrivance, the subtle blood is pumped forward from the right ventricle of the heart to a large circuit through the lungs. In the lungs [blood] is elaborated and becomes red, and it is transfused from the pulmonary artery (arterial vein) to the pulmonary vein (venous artery). Later, in the same pulmonary vein it mingles with the air inspired and through expiration it is purified again of the dark vapors... Thus, not only air is sent from the lungs to the heart, but air mixed with blood through the pulmonary artery. Therefore, the mixture takes place in the lungs. The red color is given to it in the lungs, and not in the heart. There is not enough room in the left ventricle of the heart for such a big and abundant mixture, nor the mechanism to give blood its red color. Finally, the ventricular partition, since it is lacking in vessels and mechanisms, it is not permeable to the blood though something may possibly sweat through.” (Christianismi Restitutio, p. 169-170).

More info:
 
Back to Top
pebbles View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 12-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
  Quote pebbles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 00:05
I thought the defeat of Spanish Armada marked the beginning of decline for the Spanish Empire.I would say The Spanish-American War finally drove a nail into Spain's coffin.
 
This world is still English-dominated,so it's possible there are great scientists contributed immensely to mankind lesser known to us.Nikola Tesla is one such example,Thomas Edison took credit of his work.
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 01:00
Indeed. However, if Spaniards had payed attention to Peral, they perfectly could have sunk the American fleet. That was reacheable and had changed history.
 
And yes. English-dominated history has left away some great people, like Tesla, who invented alternated current among thousand of other inventions.
 
Back to Top
pebbles View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 12-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
  Quote pebbles Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 01:58
This post of mine is little off-topic again,still remains within the subject of Spanish contributions & relates to Spanish Empire
 
Pablo Picasso & Salvadore Dali are two great artists.
 
The Spanish Peso  (also known as the piece of eight, the real de a ocho or the eight-real coin) was the first world currency.Trade was often conducted with Spanish dollars between Britain & American colonies.Spanish coinage was legal tender in the United States until an Act of Congress discontinued the practice in 1857.The pricing of equities on U.S. stock exchanges in 1/8-dollar denominations persisted until the NYSE converted first to pricing in sixteenths of a dollar in1997,and shortly after that, to decimal pricing.
 
 
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 11:07

An interesting unknown figure is Juan Roget; the inventor of nothing less than the telescope. This fact has been known for decades in Spain, but only recently it has been spread abroad.

Sorry but I have no pictures of Roget.
 
 
 
From BBC news:
 
Controversy over telescope origin

The traditional account places the telescope's origins in the Netherland

New evidence suggests the telescope may have been invented in Spain, not the Netherlands or Italy as has previously been assumed.

The findings, outlined in the magazine History Today, suggest the telescope's creator could have been a spectacle-maker based in Gerona, Spain.

The first refracting telescopes were thought to have appeared in the Netherlands in 1608.

But the first examples may actually have been made for Spanish merchants.

The inventor, according to historian Nick Pelling, could have been a man called Juan Roget, who died between 1617 and 1624.

The idea subsequently travelled north to the Netherlands, where, in 1608, three separate individuals claimed the invention as their own.

Patently false?

The Dutch spectacle-maker Hans Lipperhey submitted his application for a patent on 2 October 1608.

On 14 October, reports of another man demonstrating a telescope surfaced in the Netherlands.

And on 17 October 1608, another spectacle-maker, Jacob Metius of Alkmaar, put in an independent patent for a telescope.

But Mr Pelling finds the traditional account lacking: "Throughout history, there have been cases of people inventing things all at the same time. But generally, there's a good reason for that. It's because someone had put down a challenge.

He told BBC News: "In 1608, no one had presented a challenge - there's no perception of a challenge. It doesn't make any sense. Three people did not invent the telescope in the space of two weeks."

More recently, other historians have suggested the telescope was first invented in Italy.

Mr Pelling got involved in the area when he came across a reference on the internet to a research paper published in 1959 by a Spanish optometrist and amateur historian by the name of Simon de Guilleuma.

De Guilleuma investigated a reference in a book published in 1609 by the Italian Girolamo Sirtori.

In the book, Sirtori describes a meeting with an aged spectacle maker called Juan Roget in Gerona who he described as the real inventor of the telescope.

Death register

Telescope historians have considered Roget - who hailed from Burgundy in France - too marginal to pursue. But de Guilleuma discovered a reference to the death of his wife in an official register.

He also found official listings for many of Roget's relatives in Barcelona, many of whom were also spectacle-makers. They matched the descriptions detailed by Sirtori, and existed in exactly the places and dates he described.

De Guilleuma did not stop there; he looked for "ulleras" - a Catalan word originally meaning eyeglass, but later used for telescope - in inventories of goods from contemporary deaths in Barcelona.

The earliest was from 10 April 1593 when a Don Pedro de Carolona passed down "a long eyeglass decorated with brass" to his wife.

However, Mr Pelling accepts in his article that this item could have referred to a magnifying lens with a long handle.

But he says a subsequent reference to an "eyeglass/telescope for long sight" from 1608 sounds like a Roget telescope.

Later improvement

According to Mr Pelling, Roget - and his customers - may simply have failed to see the potential for the invention.

"It's a bit like golf courses. The people who make golf courses often go bust. It's the person who buys the course who makes money," said Mr Pelling.

He said in his article in History Today: "Even at the time, I think it was clear that all the Dutch claimants were lying, misleading, misremembering and concealing to various degrees."

Mr Pelling said he had been in contact with de Guilleuma's family and now hoped to be able to view other, unpublished research left by the historian after he died.

The Tuscan astronomer Galileo Galilei would greatly improve on the Dutch designs.

These refracting telescopes used lenses to form an image. In 1616, Galileo's compatriot Nicolo Zucchi developed the first reflecting telescope - which used an arrangement of mirrors to create an image.

 
 
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 11:24
The question then has to be asked, 'why do these inventors not get the recognition they deserve?'
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 11:41

Some do, but only in small scale. For instance, the IEEE recognizes Torres Quevedo as a precursor of computer age, but outside the circle of historians of computer engineering nobody knows him.

The situation is similar, perhaps, to the idea of China before the works of Neeham. All the celebration of Chinese inventions we are so accustumed today exists thanks to the works of that schollar. Before that, some people though gunpowder was invented by Roger Bacon and printing was developed in Germany.

Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 12:35
Originally posted by pinguin

 
Miguel de Servet, discoverer of the circulation of blood.
 
 

To be accurate He is the First European to describe it, Arabic Scientist Ibn Al Nafis described it long time before Miguel.


Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 12:38
Yes, that's true. Perhaps Servet was influenced by those works.
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 15:54
Originally posted by Constantine XI

The question then has to be asked, 'why do these inventors not get the recognition they deserve?'

Just national myths ... when some country is on top and they have the money to move science from theory to practice, they say, "We're the best and we invented everything!! Can't you tell ... just see how powerful we are!!"

The Americans do it now, the Brits did it before them. I bet the Spaniards probably did it, before that. The Chinese will probably be doing it next.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Feb-2009 at 23:14
Well, let's go on to Jeronimo Ayanz.
 
Do you imagine Britain had rejected the inventions of James Watt? That nobody would had taken seriously his invention or try to make it to produce? What would had happened?
 
That's preciselly what happened to Jeronimo Ayanz, the most important Spanish inventor of the "Golden Age" of Spain. Among other things, Ayanz developed the process of silver for the mines of the Americas, and for that he is remembered.
 
 
A century before Newcomen, Ayanz patented and shown in public his steam machine, to extract water from mines. However, his death interrupted the plan and his idea was forgotten.
Besides the steam machine, Ayanz developed the first refrigeration system; also forgotten.
Only in recent years, mouses of libraries have found out the evidence of the world of Ayanz and made it public; unfortunately only in Spanish -so far.
 
From wiki, a timeline of the development of Steam Machines. Notice where Ayanz stands.
The Ayanz machine was identical to the one invented by Newcomen in 1712.
 

Early examples

  • 1: Hero of Alexandria describes the aeolipile, as an example of the power of heated air or water. The device consists of a rotating ball spun by steam jets; it produced little power and had no practical application, but is nevertheless the first known device moved by steam pressure. He also describes a way transferring water from one vessel to another using pressure, filling a bucket the weight of which worked tackle to open temple doors, closed again by a deadweight once the water in the bucket had been drawn out by a vacuum caused by cooling of the initial vessel.
  • 1551: Taqi al-Din describes a steam turbine-like device for rotating a spit.
  • 1601: Giovanni Battista della Porta performs experiments on using steam to create pressure or a vacuum.
  • 1606: Jerónimo de Ayanz y Beaumont patents a steam-powered device for pumping water out of deep mines.
  • 1615: Salomon de Caus, who had been an engineer and architect under Louis XIII, publishes a book showing a device similar to that of Porta.
  • 1629: Giovanni Branca suggests using a steam turbine device similar to that described by Taqi al-Din but intended to be used to power a series of pestles working in mortars.
  • 1630: David Ramsey is granted a patent for various steam applications, although no description is given and the patent also covers a number of unrelated inventions. He refers to a "fire engine", and this term is used for many years.
MORE INFORMATION:
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Feb-2009 at 08:51
Originally posted by pinguin

Well, let's go on to Jeronimo Ayanz.
 
Do you imagine Britain had rejected the inventions of James Watt? That nobody would had taken seriously his invention or try to make it to produce? What would had happened?
 

 
 


Ayanz was not first either, and the reason why he isn't known is the same why you mentioned Watt instead of Branca or Garay or anyone else of the dozens who made similar attempts - his machine was probably crap and inefficient. Watt became known for the fact that he revolutionized the Newcomen design (the first useable engine) so it became relatively efficient and saved a lot of money.

The first steam engine in Sweden was a "fire-and-air machine" made by a Swede who worked in English mines and got to know the technology there. It was a Newcomen style engine, and the crew, being unfamiliar with the technology, had much problems with it. Not only did it empty the forests from trees, being horribly inefficient, it also broke down all the time and eventually the crew boiled over themselves and chucked the whole thing down a mine shaft.


The Ayanz machine was identical to the one invented by Newcomen in 1712.

Not if that's the correct plan you posted. Newcomen's was piston driven. This one looks just like a boiler. Since I can't find a description of the working cycle, I can only guess it from your pic. In that case it simply seems to open the right valve to increase the pressure in the apparently sealed mine shaft and thusly push the water up the tube. Without actually calculating anything, that does seem awfully inefficient. I doubt it was ever in use - please show me something on it if I'm wrong (unfortunately I don't read Spanish well, but in the article I couldn't see that is was in use somewhere).




Edited by Styrbiorn - 23-Feb-2009 at 09:47
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Feb-2009 at 12:29
A "small" mistake on my side. It is not the machine of Newcomen, which Ayanz made first, but the machine of Savery!!
 
The device of Ayanz worked and was patented, and was in functions to the time of his death. He made more atmospheric machines beside that.
 
Ayanz is considered these days by schollars as the Spanish Da Vinci.
 
 
Take a look:
 
 El inventor hace uso destacado de sus máquinas de vapor, registradas en el 1606, para desaguar las minas, en especial la de Guadalcanal, que logra volver a poner en marcha tras su desahucio. Perfecciona el sistema incluyendo un elemento del siglo XX, el eyector de vapor, empleado en propulsar fluidos por medio del vapor, lo cual le permite refrescar el aire en estancias de edificios, lo que hoy en día denominamos aire acondicionado.

Una aplicación didáctico-práctica

Para terminar y dado que seguramente muchos de los lectores del libro sobre Ayanz tendrán la curiosidad de elaborar ellos mismos una sencilla máquina térmica (como fue el caso del que subscribe), aquí van unas pequeñas sugerencias para que con unos mínimos medios podamos desarrollar tal proyecto. Un proyecto, como se ve en los gráficos contrapuestos, reproduce el modelo de Ayanz, posteriormente copiado por Savery.

Diseño de Ayanz según Nicolás García TapiaDiseño de Savery

En nuestro caso, el diseño lo hemos realizado con la colaboración del Profesor de Física y Química del IES Estelas de Cantabria D. Álvaro Roldan; el trabajo de cuatro abnegados alumnos de Ciencia, Tecnología y Sociedad (Ángel Buenaga, Victor Martínez, Alberto Castillo y Alejandro Ruíz), las acertadas matizaciones de Nuria Suárez y el modelo de máquina del Director del Departamento de Física aplicada de la Universidad de Cantabria D. Julio Güemez.

los alumnos Ángel Buenaga, Victor Martínez, Alberto Castillo y Alejandro Ruíz recrean el diseño de Ayanz

Dicho modelo consta de un matraz con salida lateral y manómetro (generador de vapor), una cámara intermedia, un recipiente inferior, un depósito superior, tubos de conexión y tres válvulas. Mediante el vapor de agua producido en el matraz calentado mediante la combustión de butano –valvula A abierta–, se evacua todo el aire de una cámara conectada mediante un tubo con el recipiente inferior que contiene el agua a subir –válvula B abierta y válvula C cerrada–. Una vez evacuado el aire se cierra la válvula A, que controla el paso del vapor a la cámara y ésta se enfría mediante un chorro externo de agua fría. Al disminuir la temperatura el vapor de agua condensa, se hace un vacío parcial y la presión atmosférica hace subir el agua desde el recipiente inferior hasta la cámara superior. Una vez llena la cámara intermedia se conecta de nuevo el chorro de vapor (válvula A abierta), se abre la válvula C y cerrando la B se impulsa el agua hacia el recipiente superior.

la maquina de Savery

Dependiendo de la altura a la que se encuentre el depósito superior, la presión del vapor de agua en el matraz debe ser mayor (1 atmósfera –105 Pa– por cada 10 metros de altura).

La altura a la que se puede encontrar el depósito superior viene determinada por la presión que pueda soportar el conjunto de la máquina. Sin embargo, la profundidad a la que se encuentra el recipiente inferior no puede ser mayor de los 10 m, pues la presión atmosférica sólo puede elevar una columna de agua esa altura (o una columna de mercurio de 76 cm, pues el mercurio es algo más de 13 veces más denso que el agua).

Bibliografía sobre el autor

García Tapia, Nicolás: Técnica y poder en Castilla durante los siglos XVI y XVII, Salamanca 1989.

Ingeniería y Arquitectura en el Renacimiento español, Valladolid 1990.

Patentes de invención españolas en el Siglo de Oro, Madrid 1990.

Del dios del fuego a la máquina de vapor. La introducción de la técnica en Hispanoamérica, Valladolid 1992.

— «Some designs of Jerónimo de Ayanz. Relating to Mining, Metallurgy and Steam Pumps», History of Technology, 14, 1992, págs. 135-150.

— «Les premières applications de la vapeur: le cas de Jerónimo de Ayanz», Relations Science-Technique, San Francisco 1993, págs. 279-285.

— «Nobleza, pintura e invención. ¿Jerónimo de Ayanz pintor?», Estudios de Arte. Homenaje al profesor Martín González, Valladolid 1995, págs. 499-504.

García Tapia, Nicolás y Jesús Carrillo Castillo: Tecnología e Imperio. Ingenios y leyendas del Siglo de Oro. Turriano, Lastanosa, Herrera, Ayanz, Madrid 2002.

Bibliografía sobre la Máquina de Savery

(Gracias a la colaboración del Profesor J. Güemez de la Universidad de Cantabria.)

W. Taylor, Physics, The Pioneer Science, Volumen 1: Mechanics Heat, Sound, Dover Publications, Nueva York 1959.

R. Porter, M. Ogilvie, Cons. Eds., The Hutchinson Dictionary of Scientific Biography, 3ª ed., Helicon Publishing, Oxford (UK) 2000, vols. I y II.

I. Kolin, The evolution of the heat engine, Longman, Londres 1972.

J. McGahan, «Collapsing soda cans and efficiency», The Physics Teacher, vol. 28, págs. 550-551 (1990).

A. P. Feldman, «A model of the Savery steam engine», The Physics Teacher, 19, 414 (1981).

A. A., «An improved Franklin's flask and simplified cryosphorus», Am. J. Phys., 1, 86 (1933)

B. A. Smith, «Wollaston's cryophorus-precursor of the heat pipe», Phys. Educ., 15, 310, (1980)

D. F. Channell, «The problem of two back-pressures: the development of Watt's separate condenser», Am. J. Phys., 42 65 (1974); H. S. Leff, Heat engines and the performance of external work, Am. J. Phys. 46, 218 (1978).

A. Rupert Hall, From Galileo to Newton, Dover Publications, Nueva York 1981, pág. 320.

Ll. W. Taylor, A History of Mechanical Inventions, Dover Publications, Nueva York 1982, págs. 345-346

 
 
Back to Top
Styrbiorn View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
  Quote Styrbiorn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Feb-2009 at 13:03
Originally posted by pinguin

A "small" mistake on my side. It is not the machine of Newcomen, which Ayanz made first, but the machine of Savery!!
 

 

Yep, that looks like similar principles. One can then assume their engines were equally useless and therefore none of them became known.

edit: when it comes to steam engines, the actual principle was known since Heron. Heron's aelopile was however not really an engine, rather a fancy toy, and it took centuries to produce an engine out of it. The practical application took a long time to get to work efficiently, and it was an ongoing process and development rather than a sudden single inventor. Savery was probably indeed inspired by Ayanz's patent, but Savery was also one of the many lesser known improvers. Newcomen's engine and especially Watts, who improved the formers with some 75% in efficiency, are the ones who are known because their engines were actually useful in a larger sense. People usually wants to credit single persons, rather than all the developers. I guess it's because that is easier (the human trait of laziness that drives invention in the first place).


Edited by Styrbiorn - 23-Feb-2009 at 13:20
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Feb-2009 at 14:35
Oh yes. Now that a Spaniard invented something earlier than any northern european, the invention has to be forgotten.
The invention of Savery maybe irrelevant, but the fact is that guy copied Ayanz.
I am not certain he didn't invent something closer to Newcomen but Ayanz studied the transformation of linear to circular movement through gears.
You should see all the inventions of Ayanz to convince yourself I am not kidding when I said he was a superb genious. Take a look at air conditioning and his underwater experiments as well.
Anyways. You will hear more about him in the future. I bet on that.


Edited by pinguin - 23-Feb-2009 at 14:46
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  12>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.