Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Jhangora
Chieftain
Joined: 02-Oct-2005
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1070
|
Quote Reply
Topic: How to read a genetic map Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 12:22 |
Originally posted by Cywr
Or alternativly, areas where a whole load of different people have passed through over the mellenia. In contrast, the more of a geographic dead end an area is, the fewer branches of the human family tree are represented there. Makes sense really, geographical determinism and all that.
|
So Eastern China n Central S America r geographical dead ends relatively speaking.
|
Jai Badri Vishal
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Cywr
King
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 12:26 |
Yup, as is Australia, N.W. Europe, and such.
|
![](http://img422.imageshack.us/img422/378/piratesmile9si.gif) Arrrgh!!"
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 13:51 |
Originally posted by gcle2003
Boy is this thread difficult to read, physically.
I guess because it accomodates itself to the width of the largest
image. |
I know and I'm sorry about it but I couldn't imagine a way to fix
it. Most images can't be scaled without becoming unreadable and the big
tree of Arizona University particularly.
I don't claim to know much about the specific subject, but
at one time I did do a lot of work on numerical taxonomy, which I
assume is the sort of technique used to generate these trees.
I'm aware therefore that an awful lot of subject decision-making
goes into the choice of distance measures - i.e. both spatial
geometries for inter-individual measures and inter-group measuring
rules like nearest-neighbour, furthest-neighbour, centre-of-gravity and
so on - and rules for defining optimal groupings.
So are there any links to something indicating how the trees were derived from the data? |
I'll try to find something of the like (I found something: http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/genalg/genalg.html) but I must reckon that I am
almost as confused about all the mess of names and strings as you may
be. I'm so far taking the word of scholars on this and trying to
understand.
Most sources are very technical (or very limited) and I haven't yet
found any comprehensive site on this matter. Maybe the best (but
limited) for commoners like us is http://racialreality.shorturl.com/.
If you really want to learn, you'll probably have to go to a good
library and buy the best you can find in the issue (all very recent for
sure) - or, of course, take a universitary course on Genetics.
Then come back and teach us something. ![](smileys/smiley1.gif)
I'm also a little chary of assuming that because one can
possibly identify a root class, that that indicates a single individual
- the pseudo-Adam or the pseudo-Eve. |
They don't assume just like that that the pseudo-Adam or pseudo-Eve
were just one person nor that, even if that would have been the case,
that other peoples' legacy isn't present in us via male-female-male or
female-male-female lineages. It just means that most probably all human
identifiable genetic lineages come from one relatively small and
homogeneous source (tribe, nation, whatever). That's why we talk of
"pseudo".
Edited by Maju
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 14:06 |
Originally posted by Cywr
Yup, as is Australia, N.W. Europe, and such.
|
Actually SW Europe is more of a dead end. Everything points out to the
fact that the strait of Gibraltar has acted as an effective barrier and
input from North Africa has been minimal. Input from Continental Europe
has also been rather small and there the connection is rather a common
"South French" or "proto-Basque" origin for most of Western European
population.
Another think that must be take into account is random drift, specially
when the population has been very small in some periods (something we
can imagine for almost anywhere): let's say some people had 5 Y-chr
lineages 30,000 years ago but, accidentally, 3 of them happen to be cut
by whole reproducing generations of females. Now we would only see 2
lineages but much more were present initially and all them have given
their diploid (and X-chr) genetic apportation to the population anyhow.
Y-chr and MtDNA lineages can be tricky.
Finally, random migration patterns must be taken in account too. Two
diferent lineages may have happened to go to place A (maybe they were
best friends but had diferent genetic backgrounds) and only one of them
to place B.
This is particularly shocking when we look at Australia, New Guinea and
SE Asia. In comprehensive non-haploid genetic studies (i.e.
Cavalli-Sforza) they all fall in the same major branch (though the
Australian and New Guinean branches are very very long and distinct),
yet when we look at Y-chromosome lineages a completely diferent pattern
emerges.
That's why I say that we must be cautious with the latter.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 14:23 |
Some interesting articles I've found:
Hope they are of your interest.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Exarchus
General
Joined: 18-Jan-2005
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 10:13 |
So, who are the ubermensch?
|
Vae victis!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Cywr
King
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6003
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 10:15 |
Depends, whats your criteria for Uberness?
|
![](http://img422.imageshack.us/img422/378/piratesmile9si.gif) Arrrgh!!"
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 12:17 |
Originally posted by Exarchus
So, who are the ubermensch?
|
Toulousaines.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Degredado
Consul
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 366
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 12:34 |
Originally posted by Maju
Originally posted by Exarchus
So, who are the ubermensch? |
Toulousaines. ![](smileys/smiley2.gif)
|
No. The Kriptonians. A red cape and blue spandex is needed, and only a Kriptonian would have them.
What do these maps say about the Portuguese?
|
Vou votar nas putas. Estou farto de votar nos filhos delas
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2005 at 14:43 |
Originally posted by Degredado
What do these maps say about the Portuguese? |
The greatest info is in the Y-chromosome lineage (dad-son only, first
map and also some of the latter trees, which try to explain things in
depth and clear out confussion) and it is very simmilar to that of
Spain, maybe a little more Mediterranean, but just a little.
In general Iberia fits fully in Western Europe, with some more
Mediterranean blood, specially in the south. The Western European
majority (Hg1+Hg22 ~ R1a, green and light green) seems to be of
Paleolithic origin.
Hg2 (blue) is confuse and could belong to Central European or Balcanic
lineages that came also in the Paleolithic (I) or to Mediterranean ones
(G, F).
The rest (brown and black slices: Hg9 = J and Hg21 ~ E) is clearly Mediterranean and could have come in the following episodes:
- Neolithic difussion (most likely the greatest apportation): this can have two origins:
- Greece/Adriatic (Cardium Pottery)
- North Africa (Andalusian Neolithic) ?
- Phoenician domain (small)
- Internal migrations in the Roman Empire (small)
- Muslim domain (can't be too large but it's dificult to say, some Berber blood surely came in this period).
In the first map, there's no diferent data for southern or SE Spain,
which must have some stronger Mediterranean apportation but there is
diferent data for north and south Portugal and southern Portugal
clearly has more Mediterranean lineages than the north (that's no
surprise), specially those that could be linked to North Africa (Hg21).
Yet, if we stop in Iberian prehistory, we see that Portuguese Neolithic
is very influenced by Andalusian one, which may have its origins in
North Africa (this is obscure though), so such an small extra piece of
North African blood in southern portugal (and probably also in
Andalusia) is logical.
In brief, Iberia as whole is mostly Western European with some
Mediterranean stuff that is clearly smaller in other parts of Western
Europe (France, Britain, Belgium, Ireland). Germany, Denmark and the
Netherlands are also close but more influenced by Central European Hg2
and other stuff (some Mediterranenans in the Netherlands, a lot of
Eastern European Hg3 lineages in Germany). Italy also falls in the
Western European area with a much stronger mixure with Mediterranean
lineages.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Nov-2005 at 15:28 |
Some updates.
One thing is becoming clear regarding the intial map: Hg2 is no valid
haplogroup, as it includes at least two real groups that are present in
Europe: I (that is considered originally European has been associated
to Gravetian expansion and also to Vikings, though I find this very
unlikely) and G, which belongs to the group of "Mediterranean" markers,
along with E (Hg21 and others) and J (Hg9), most likely original from
Near East and/or North Africa.
Also I wanted to post these MtDNA graphics, that I found in http://www.roperld.com/mtDNA.htm#haplogroups:
Notice that the fancy names of the "grandmas" are just creations based
in the scientifical letter. Hence all starting with L are L1, L2, etc.
L0 is the mythocodrial pseudo-Eve, an extint lineage.
The corresponding map is too large, so I will just post the link: http://www.roperld.com/graphics/MigrationMap.jpg
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Nov-2005 at 15:51 |
Another good map on haploid migrations:
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
akritas
Chieftain
Hegemom
Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Location: Greek Macedonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2005 at 16:08 |
Thank's Maju. Very usefull thread
|
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Maju
King
Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Nov-2005 at 17:10 |
It's sometimes confusing. But I guess it's normal, it's a very young science.
I found some very good maps on World distribution (by macro-regions) of MtDNA and Y chromosome haplogroups:
Take a look because I think they are very interesting, though too large to post directly.
|
NO GOD, NO MASTER!
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Odin
Shogun
Joined: 04-Apr-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 211
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 05-Apr-2006 at 00:27 |
Here is an intersting site with info on this stuff, very interesting.
https://www3.nationalgeographic.com/genographic/atlas.html
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |