Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Worst U.S. President

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>
Author
swamp rat View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 19-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote swamp rat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Worst U.S. President
    Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 12:52

What I was trying to say is that if you compare the worst Europe has given the world as opposed to the worst America has given the world, no American President even comes close to the Evil thugs that have spewed out from the nations of Europe in the last 300 years or so. Hitler and Stalin were blood thirsty morons who killed a combined total of over 100 million people. I don't recall reading about any leader from North America that has ever even attempted that scale of mass slaughter in history.

Like I said if any American President comes close to Hilter it would be Andrew Jackson but again the scale of deaths he caused and inflected were far less than Hitler or Stalin.

I never said President Bush is a good President but I don't see where any clear minded person could compare him to Hitler due to the fact that he has yet to slaughter 40 million people.

As a matter of fact, after 9-11 under America's policy of massive retaliation laid down in the 1950s and 1960s America could have used Nuclear weapons in responce to the Sept 11th attacks. Had Bush been Hilter like he would have. (Many on the far right were in favor of using tactical Nuclear weapons in the mountian areas of Afghanistan including, Vice President Chenney.) I myself was in favor of using special operations forces and pin-point bombing. In my opinion the New York Police Dept. would have been of better use than the military. People have lost sight of the fact that what happend on 9-11 was not an act of war but a crime to be handled by law enforcement not by the military.

As far as Iraq goes we have no bussness there. 

  

 

If we had a nuclear war all that would be left is cock roaches and Dick Clark.
Back to Top
hugoestr View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 13-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3987
  Quote hugoestr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 13:36
Originally posted by swamp rat



As a matter of fact, after 9-11 under America's policy of massive retaliation laid down in the 1950s and 1960s America could have used Nuclear weapons in responce to the Sept 11th attacks.



I understand your point. I just want to comment on this detail.

It was during the 1950s that the government put in place the policy of using nuclear weapons for strategic reasons only. It was during this time that the foundation for our current world policy of nuclear weapons reduction was developed. Some of these ideas were discussed as early as in the late 1940s.

Important element of this policy were already implemented by the early 1960s.

As you correctly stated in the rest of this post, there were people that wanted to use nukes as tactical weapons. Fortunately their view didn't prevail. The Soviet's announcement of possessing atomic weapons was an important factor that made the U.S. reject the tactial use policy.

I am sure that our in-house Soviet expert will fill in the details that I am leaving out, and will correct anything that i innacurate.

Nuclear policy is not my area of expertise, but I recently heard a series of radio programs that talked about this issue. My comments are based on those programs.

Back to Top
swamp rat View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 19-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote swamp rat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 17:22
As far as I am conserned no nation great or small has the right to have or use nuclear weapons.
If we had a nuclear war all that would be left is cock roaches and Dick Clark.
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 19:22
Originally posted by swamp rat

If compared to the worst leaders of Europe say, Hitler Stalin or Mosilini I don't think any American president comes close to those tyrrants. Andrew Jackson was the most Hitler-like of all presidents on account of laying down the policy of mass extermanation of the native Americans in the 19th century but even he falls short of becoming a tyrrant on the scale of Europes worse.

I have seen President Bush be compared to Hitler a few times in the media, Yet Hilter slaughtered 7 million Jews and dirrectly caused the deaths of somewhere between 40 to 60 million people. Bush too falls far short.

As far as Truman, he did more for the advancement of civil rights than any president since Lincoln. A stance that almost cost him reelection in 1948.

As US presidents go for Genocide, I suppose LBJ's policy of mass extermination of the civil populous of Lao, killed more people in total than any president genociding Indians or Filipinos.

http://www.savannanet.com/uslegacy.htm



Edited by Paul
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Spartakus View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
terörist

Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
  Quote Spartakus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 19:26
Bill Clinton.
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 19:35
Originally posted by Spartakus

Bill Clinton.


out of curiosity what makes you say that Clinton is the worst?


Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
Spartakus View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
terörist

Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
  Quote Spartakus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 19:41

I cannot think anyone else right now.He is the first idiot i've thinked.

"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
Back to Top
swamp rat View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 19-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote swamp rat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 21:58

Clinton was far from the worse! I think we could have done better in the last several years as far as presidents go. Carter was a piss poor president but then again so was Ford and Bush Sr. Nixon and Reagan were a little better like Clinton. As far as this Bush goes give me a few more years.  My vote is Andrew Jackson for the worse.

 

If we had a nuclear war all that would be left is cock roaches and Dick Clark.
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Aug-2005 at 23:57
I thought Clinton was pretty decent. I think its a shame that the Republicans blew the whole Monica Lewinsky thing way out of proportion to make him look like a bad president. Weird how we can impeach a president over something like that, but yet we can't impeach Bush....

Spartakus, what is it about Clinton you didn't like? You didn't really cite any examples
Back to Top
Spartakus View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
terörist

Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
  Quote Spartakus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Aug-2005 at 05:16

No,i just do not like him.I cannot stand his face.It's stupid!

"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
Back to Top
hugoestr View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 13-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3987
  Quote hugoestr Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Aug-2005 at 16:04
Originally posted by Spartakus

No,i just do not like him.I cannot stand his face.It's stupid!



I felt something very similar towards him until the Monica scandal happened. Then I heard on the radio middle-age ladies saying that they wish that Clinton would play with a cigar with them, and they wouldn't tell.

Then I went to my barber, a conservative vet, and he was saying that if a young girl showed him her underpants, he didn't know what he would do .

Finally, my father-in-law, who hated the man to death, read Primary Colors and kept clippings about the Monica story in it as evidence as how horrible he was. We saw the movie movie together, and at the end he turned towards us and said, smiling: "that Clinton is just human, that is all."

When you have these people falling in love with Clinton, you can't help yourself from doing the same.
Back to Top
Hak-Khan View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian


Joined: 28-Aug-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 164
  Quote Hak-Khan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-Sep-2005 at 22:04
all of them without JFK
Back to Top
rangerstew View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 12-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote rangerstew Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Sep-2005 at 14:52

I would have to say Abraham Lincoln! He totally mishandled the secession of the southern states, most of which would not have left the union if he had not been elected.

Actually, Im being sarcastic, but we must all realize that many consider him the greatest president, now after over 150 years of retrospect when at the time of his presidency he was hated by the people who make the most noise, yet still won a second election. Sound familiar?

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Sep-2005 at 19:02
I would say Truman. Many presidents have done many irrational and immoral things, but according to me the decission to throw an atomic bomb on two Japanese cities (altough they were the enemie at the time, an atomic bomb shouldn't have been used, especialy not at that moment, the war was 'over'). The victims of the bombs wern't soldiers, they were innocent people. The impact on the planet of such an event is something we'd radar 'not talk about' either. He may have done a lot af great things to make the social situation better, using an atomic bomb is something I can't possibly see as usefull. The attack on pearl harbor shouldn't have been without consequences but could't there have been a better way then this?
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Sep-2005 at 19:55

Im so sick of people bashing Truman. Im not going to reiterate the same damn argument I have been making throughout this thread and I dont feel its necessary to defend the tactic that killed less people than conventional bombing  did anyway (people who were a support structure of a governmetn which killed far more civilians than all allied bombing campaigns over both Germany and Japan combined).  Truman did what anyone with a brain would have done, and my mere existence and the survival of my family from what would have been a far more catastrophic conventional invasion fo Japan is vindication of his decisions.

This is the same president who was behind the Marshall Plan, and the desegregation of the military.  He was the second greatest American president of the 20th century.

"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
ok ge View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Aug-2005
Location: Saudi Arabia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1775
  Quote ok ge Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Sep-2005 at 20:51
I cannot think of anyone worst that Bush. But I cannot think of anything that explains how did he survive a second term!!!
D.J. Kaufman
Wisdom is the reward for a lifetime of listening ... when youd have preferred to talk.
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Sep-2005 at 21:02
Now that I can agree with, except for Andrew Jackson, I think Bush II is the worst.
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
Illuminati View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 949
  Quote Illuminati Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2005 at 16:48
Just to be fair in terms of history. Alot of very popular presidents, such as Lincoln and Reagan were also vastly unpopular at times during their presidency. I highly doubt George W Bush will be remembered as a good president, but it is premature to say he is the worst we have ever had. Wait a few years and then reflect on him. We don't yet know how all of hs actions are going to play out in the long run. Its fair to criticize Bush all you want, but its too early to rate him as the worst ever. Doing so, just shows an ignorant understanding  of history



Edited by Illuminati
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2005 at 18:13
Originally posted by Tobodai

Im so sick of people bashing Truman. Im not going to reiterate the same damn argument I have been making throughout this thread and I dont feel its necessary to defend the tactic that killed less people than conventional bombing  did anyway (people who were a support structure of a governmetn which killed far more civilians than all allied bombing campaigns over both Germany and Japan combined).  Truman did what anyone with a brain would have done, and my mere existence and the survival of my family from what would have been a far more catastrophic conventional invasion fo Japan is vindication of his decisions.

This is the same president who was behind the Marshall Plan, and the desegregation of the military.  He was the second greatest American president of the 20th century.

Tobodai:

People do not read the threads, nor, evidently, do they read much history.  In any event, most of their interpretations seem rather pre-judged and not open to discussion.  Just my impression of the forum you understand.

Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2005 at 18:14

Originally posted by Althea

I would say Truman. Many presidents have done many irrational and immoral things, but according to me the decission to throw an atomic bomb on two Japanese cities (altough they were the enemie at the time, an atomic bomb shouldn't have been used, especialy not at that moment, the war was 'over'). The victims of the bombs wern't soldiers, they were innocent people. The impact on the planet of such an event is something we'd radar 'not talk about' either. He may have done a lot af great things to make the social situation better, using an atomic bomb is something I can't possibly see as usefull. The attack on pearl harbor shouldn't have been without consequences but could't there have been a better way then this?

No.  In war, one uses the advantages one has.

The consequences of Pearl Harbor were the Pacific war.



Edited by pikeshot1600
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 34567 10>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.043 seconds.