QuoteReplyTopic: About Ancient Diolkos Posted: 13-Sep-2007 at 07:13
The 45-year long deterioration of Ancient Diolkos is the subject of a petition started last November.
The petition, which you can find at www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/870477005, asks the Greek Prime Minister to intervene and put an end to the destruction of this monument of 600 BC.
The Diolkos was the paved way over which ships could be hauled from the Saronic to the Corinthian Gulf and viceversa.
After
the excavation (~1960), the monument was left at the mercy of its
position near the Corinth Canal. Rescue actions continued to be denied even when the erosion had left considerable portions of this registered archaeological site in a state of demolition!
Under
the pressure coming from many parts (including the Prime Minister's
Office, which is being notified about this petition), a first master
plan was approved by the Central Archaeological Council on Sept. 4th,
2007.
Having by now at their heels two Justice Authorities and a Public Administration Control Body, the Ministry appears struggling to understand the monument's needs - but still leaving the monument unprotected...
I invite everybody to sign. The petition has already been signed by concerned citizens from 74 countries: Greece,
Cyprus, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom, USA, Canada, Australia, Germany,
Netherlands, France, Luxemburg, Malta, Portugal, Brazil, Switzerland,
Denmark, Finland, Austria, Poland, Ireland, Iceland, Belgium,
Norway, Sweden, Hungary, Russia, Georgia, Estonia, Slovakia,
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Czech Republic,
Lithuania, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Serbia and Montenegro, Turkey,
Israel, Japan, Repubic of Korea, Kyrgyzstan, Hong Kong, China, Taiwan,
Macao, South Africa, Liberia, Togo, Nigeria, Bahamas, New Zealand,
Fiji, Mexico, Trinidad and Tobago, Chile, Colombia,
Argentina, Venezuela, Guatemala, Maldives, India, Pakistan, Sri Lanka, Seychelles, Iran, Iraq, United Arab Emirates, Algeria, Lebanon, Jordan, Palestine
Diolkos has never been protected. It has
been shocking for me, to gradually find out about its long "modern
history" of neglect. Knowing I am addressing people who love our country
and who assume its treasures are adequately kept, does not make it easy on me
to say what I will say, but I think that looking straight at the truth is the
only way out.
The decay of Diolkos has not only been allowed by
the Ministry of Culture but it has also been favoured.
Very briefly, some information (and anybody is
welcome to ask me for the relevant documentation at sofia-l@tellas.gr).
1960 - c.1985; documentation is missing from the
ephorate's files but it is clear that no protection measures were taken.
1985 - after an "understanding" of the
Canal Company and the Ministry of Culture, a term calling for a restoration
study is "forgotten"
1989 - a ludicrous "study" to embellish
Diolkos is produced. It leaves completely out a large part of the monument
which has been cut out from the rest by the erosion. After more than a decade
it is actually suspended by KAS. SIX weeks after the KAS decision, the (then)
ephor, Mrs Spathari, writes to the Corinth Court of Law that the study would
soon be approved!
1992 - an antiquities guard notifies the ephorate
that the erosion approaches the smaller part of Diolkos on the Peloponnese side. No action is taken, although the
morphology of the ground at that point was favorable to practically ANY rescue
approach.
1999 - Mr Papaligouras and Mr Dimas (two members of
the parliament then at the opposition) present written questions about Diolkos.
The official answer of the Minister, Mrs. Papazoi, was that a "study of
the currents" had been asked to the Canal Company in order for measures to
be proposed. The answer is ridiculous in itself but there is more: appallingly,
as clearly denounced in the local post, NO SUCH STUDY HAD EVER BEEN ASKED.
.... in 2005, when I first met Mr Mantis (ephor
between the summer of 2001 and november 2006) he told me that he was proposing
to restore Diolkos. As I found out, however, the ephorate had NO documentation
on how the monument looked initially... Mr Mantis was not only totally
unprepared for any submission regarding funds, etc., but he also vehemently
denied any rescue operations. In a meeting held at the Ministry on February
13th, 2006, the Direction for the Restoration of Ancient Monuments (DAAM)
wasn't even invited to participate! The local ephorate kept for themselves the
role of gathering "restoration standards" within 20 days... Mr.
Mantis left the ephorate nine months later without having presented anything...
... to cut a VERY long story short, by now DAAM has
the call to the Diolkos operations (from what I gather, at least). A few stones
of the long erosion front have been supported last March, while the erosion
keeps eating away the substrate underneath them. The already fallen part of
Diolkos is suffering terribly from the waves and the wakes of passing vessels.
Having by now at their heels two Justice Authoroties and a Public
Administration Control Body, the Ministry has proceeded to compose a "master
plan" which was approved by the KAS (Cntral Archaeological Council) on
september 4th. This can be falsely reassuring: no rescue action has
yet been taken and the various relevant bodies are still largely ignorant and
non caring - of the monuments needs. (For example the Ephorate for Underwater
Antiquities, instead of doing everything to ensure rescue operations, which
call for no approval, WAITED for the master-plan to be approved BEFORE sending
a reconnaissance diving team to Diolkos...)
As can be easily deduced, the Services of the
Ministry have completely overlooked their obligations towards our heritage for
long decades.
The things I have pointed out are only SOME peaks in
a sea of illegality, neglect and this outrageous "assisted
demolition" of the defenseless monument.
Presumably "responsible" people are STILL
ignorant of basic facts about Diolkos - but this doesn't deter them from
signing documents, placing "decisions" etc...
As the terrible condition of Diolkos brings out,
there has been no control mechanism for either the monument's condition or the
responsibilities involved. Only covering-up mechanisms are always alert.
Last October, notified about my intention to open up
the petition, the Prime Minister's Office asked the Ministry of Culture about
the monument. Although two Justice Authorities and the Public Administration
Control Body were ALREADY investigating the Diolkos case, the General Secretary
of the Ministry, Mr. Zachopoulos (presumably copying Mr Mantis),
"informed" Mr. Caramanlis' Office that the waves "have by now
begun to erode the monument's substrate", actually, that is, hiding even
the condition of Diolkos!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum