Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Neanderthals - once again

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Boreasi View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 15-Sep-2006
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 300
  Quote Boreasi Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Neanderthals - once again
    Posted: 29-Apr-2007 at 18:28

The emerging fate of the Neandertals

For nearly a century, anthropologists have been debating the relationship of Neandertals to modern humans. Central to the debate is whether Neandertals contributed directly or indirectly to the ancestry of the early modern humans that succeeded them.

As this discussion has intensified in the past decades, it has become the central research focus of Erik Trinkaus, Ph.D., professor of anthropology at Washington University in St. Louis. Trinkaus has examined the earliest modern humans in Europe, including specimens in Romania, Czech Republic and France. Those specimens, in Trinkaus' opinion, have shown obvious Neandertal ancestry.

In an article appearing the week of April 23 in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Trinkaus has brought together the available data, which shows that early modern humans did exhibit evidence of Neandertal traits.

"When you look at all of the well dated and diagnostic early modern European fossils, there is a persistent presence of anatomical features that were present among the Neandertals but absent from the earlier African modern humans," Trinkaus said. "Early modern Europeans reflect both their predominant African early modern human ancestry and a substantial degree of admixture between those early modern humans and the indigenous Neandertals."

This analysis, along with a number of considerations of human genetics, argues that the fate of the Neandertals was to be absorbed into modern human groups. Just as importantly, it also says that the behavioral difference between the groups were small. They saw each other as social equals.


Be good or be gone.
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Apr-2007 at 22:41
So was it only Europeans with whom the Neandertals are supposed to have mixed? Did the Neandertals exist outside Europe?
Back to Top
Maharbbal View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
  Quote Maharbbal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Apr-2007 at 23:12
I thought the resemblance between early Europeans and Nehanderthal had been considered as a case of co-evolution (same causes, same effects). DNA tests have been run and seem to have found that Neandertal was not related to modern humans (but it has been widely contested).
I am a free donkey!
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Apr-2007 at 05:04
I think they did a study of major human genes and found no connection, but haven't ruled out a minor connection.
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Tar Szernd View Drop Down
Consul
Consul


Joined: 28-Aug-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 384
  Quote Tar Szernd Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Apr-2007 at 07:53
Originally posted by Constantine XI

So was it only Europeans with whom the Neandertals are supposed to have mixed? Did the Neandertals exist outside Europe?
 
There are some caves in Izrael and Syria, and some in East Ukraine or South Russia or Kazahstan(??), maybe Sungir or something like that; in that cave a nead. man was burried.
Back to Top
Leonardo View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jan-2006
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 778
  Quote Leonardo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2007 at 04:41
Originally posted by Constantine XI

So was it only Europeans with whom the Neandertals are supposed to have mixed? Did the Neandertals exist outside Europe?
 
Neanderthal man range:
 
 
 
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2007 at 04:49
Thankyou Leondardo. It would be interesting if Neandertals were found to have mixed with homo sapiens in only specific geographic regions, perhaps it would explain phenotypical differences between homo sapiens in one area and homo sapiens in another.

Of course with proof that Neandertals actually mixed with and contributed to the genetic makeup of today's humans, this is all pure speculation.
Back to Top
Leonardo View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jan-2006
Location: Italy
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 778
  Quote Leonardo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2007 at 05:21
Curiously enough the regions where Neanderthal man lived are the same where you can mainly find the so called "caucasian race" Smile
 
 
 
Back to Top
Constantine XI View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
  Quote Constantine XI Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2007 at 05:45
Imagine what Nazi ethnographers would make of such a finding, they would probably try to claim that the "white" race is superior owing to the fusion of the larger Neandertal brain with the more creative homo sapien - resulting in today's caucasians LOL
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 01-May-2007 at 08:52

Working out European migration history.

 

Cro-Magnon Man who would have mated with the Neanderthals would have been joined in Europe by a later groups of migrants in far superior numbers from the Steppes migrating via the Ukraine. These would have pushed the Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybrids westwards.

 

Later another groups of migrants would have arrived from the middle east pushing the Ukrainians out of eastern and central Europe. Further pressing the Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybrids to the fringes of Europe.

 

Then the ice age would have kicked in. The Ukrainians would have summer on the Riviera and northern Spain. The Middle Easterners in Northern Italy and the Balkans. The Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybreds would have taken up residence with the Ukrainians and they would have drunk cheap Spanish plonk, organised club 18-30 hols to Benidorm and before you know all been related to one another.

 

After the Ice Age the Ukrainian/Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybrids would have moved North and about 10,000 ya moved to the UK. About 8,000 the English channel filled-up and they were stranded.

 

These few bunch of Ukrainian/Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybreds would then despite foreign invasion, hostile climate, plague and war, through hard work and endeavr establish the largest empire the world's ever seen.

 

Some of these Ukrainian/Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybreds would then venture out into the empire and populate it spreading civilisation and enlightenment throughout. One such country blessed by this fate would be America.

 

In a few short generations the Ukrainian/Neanderthals/Cro-Magnons and Hybreds migrants to America would branch out and form their own country and 220 odd years later they would elect their very own president.

 

Hmm..... George Bush does has very pronounced brows..........



Edited by Paul - 01-May-2007 at 08:57
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Jun-2007 at 20:30

I have always understood the Neanderthals as being built along the lines of football players, boxers, or wrestlers. Their bones were denser than those of modern man means they couldnt possibly swim. Some say their brains were also dense. That is cruel for they evolved to suit their environment in robust activities like big game hunting. They adapted to the early European conditions, where the big game mostly lived. They died out at the beginning of the last major Ice Age for they were caught out by severe climate change.

 

Like the animals they hunted they could not go too far north or freeze, or too far south or boil. In the warmer southern climate a more gracile species of human arose, who did not rely on mammoth chops for dinner and even ate grass for supper. This was modern man and we still eat grass as wheat, rice, barley etc. The human appendix is said to come from a time when we ate grass in a more unprocessed state.

 

We graciles began to extend northwards following the grasslands and the protein packed game that fed on it. We ran into the Neanderthals and turf wars erupted over hunting grounds. They were much stronger, but not as smart and were forced further north into the onset of the Ice Age where no type of human had any chance of survival. Pockets of former tribes remained in the south but the genetic pools of breeding families were pushed too far apart to make a comeback and so they died out.    

 

It is not out of the question to suggest some of the Neanderthal race may have evolved a more gracile form quite apart from their more primitive brothers and sisters. Then the out of Africa humans obviously did not want to stay where they began. It could be suggested the majority of Neanderthals did once live in a lost land in the North Sea area, one of the largest hunting grounds in the world before it sank making any evidence of their long inhabitation unavailable. The coming of the Ice Age forced northern evolved humans southwards into the inhabitation of the swamps and forests of Europe before it was covered with glaciers, but the Southern evolved types were moving northwards making clashes inevitable.

 

Would they have bred together? Perhaps, but humans are most sensitive to smell in gaining sexual arousal. Different forms of diet and toilet behaviour were used as an attraction to the act. In Pre-ice-age days they knew they were different for their physical shape was obvious. The types of human would have been more inclined to fight, or better still stay away from each other, rather than make love. Then about physical shape, if the Neanderthals were naturally stronger that means their sexual organs were that much larger and having inter-racial sex would have been uncomfortable and not very satisfying.

elenos
Back to Top
Desperado View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 27-Apr-2006
Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
  Quote Desperado Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2007 at 09:40
Am i not a man, am I not a brother?


Reconstruction of a Neanderthal made from the cast of the skull (here on the left) which was discovered on the site called La Ferrassie in Dordogne.


No offence Ronnie!
The right picture is a reconstruction of the Gibraltar neanderthal child. Some suggest that the gene of the red hair (and probaly blonde) as well as other characteristics of the modern human came from the neanderthal population.

An interesting article on autism and other various diseases, probably a product of not so succesfull neanderthal/sapiens mixing



Homo Sapiens VS Homo ehhhhh, Neanderthalensis???
(No that's not reconstruction, this is Nikolai Valuev, the first Russian professional heavyweight boxing champion and the former holder of the WBA title between December 17, 2005 and April 15, 2007.

The mixing of Neanderthals and Sapienses DID occure at least in several places, that is a fact, confirmed by the archaeological findings, the DNA analysis didn't yet completely denyed the possibility of a fertile offspring.
It's more likely that the Neanderthals are victims not of a prehistoric genocide commited by their Homo Sapiens cousins or the last Ice Age, but of the 20 century "Al from Africa(and at once)" theory. Initially he was dehumanised to a level that prevented him to walk upright, to speak, to produce advanced weapons and art as the Sapiens - now this is admited wrong. It's even not clear whether it's Homo Neanderthalensis or Homo Sapiens Neanderthalensis. The neanderthal and sapiens polpulations were never completely isolated from one another and lived side by side for many thousand years in the Middle East. What is for sure is that the battle of "All from Africa" and the Multiregional hypothesis will continue.


Edited by Desperado - 19-Sep-2007 at 09:52
Back to Top
Desperado View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 27-Apr-2006
Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
  Quote Desperado Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2007 at 10:08
Originally posted by elenos



Then about physical shape, if the Neanderthals were naturally
stronger that means their sexual organs were that much larger and having
inter-racial sex would have been uncomfortable and not very satisfying.




Yes, the neanderthals were stronger than the modern Homo Sapiens, but the contemporary early Cromagnons wers just as robust and had a higher stature btw.
About their reproductive organs: the strenght of the animal isn't connected with their size: an example male gorilla vs male chimpanzee-the chimps are better armed below the waist
Back to Top
Justinian View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
King of Númenor

Joined: 11-Nov-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
  Quote Justinian Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 20-Sep-2007 at 18:34

Ever since I first heard of this theory about Neanderthals being absorbed into the human gene pool I have not given it much thought.  It makes sense and if you look at some modern humans, they look just like reconstructions of neanderthals.  That russian boxer sure does, that actor Ron Pearlman I think his name is, the facial structure is remarkably similar.  Especially that boxer, he's not bald and he has more hair on his back than his head.

"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann

Back to Top
Desperado View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 27-Apr-2006
Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
  Quote Desperado Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Sep-2007 at 19:02
Yes, Ron Pearlman has some archaic features.

The two left pictures are from his participation in Jean-Jacques Annaud's "Quest for Fire" where the older hypothesis of mixing is present.
It is posibble, that the common features of Sapiens and Neanderthalensis are a product of co-evolution - however the sapiens populations outside the proposed N. habitat didn't develope such features, despite the common environment. As far south-east we go on the Eurasian continent, the N. features weaken.

Another strange thing is that the remains of neanderthals not always predate that of the sapienses in the same areas. For example in the Middle East, comparing the Tabun/Amud neanderthals with Shkul and Qafzeh sapineses:



The proposed dating:


Here are the key features of Homo Neanderthalensis anatomy:


Ofcourse there're no "standart" sapiens and neanderthal individuals, in the same skeleton a neanderthal and sapiens features can coexist. On the pics are shown the extreme forms of the both types.

The source is Roger Lewin's "Human evolution",3rd edition, 2005.

Edited by Desperado - 22-Sep-2007 at 05:02
Back to Top
Windemere View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 09-Oct-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 105
  Quote Windemere Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Oct-2007 at 01:14
I think that conventional scientific opinion, based on genetic analysis, is that while Homo Neanderthalensis was the original human species inhabiting Europe and they co-existed for thousands of years with Homo Sapiens (who arrived at a somewhat later date), there was little interbreeding or genetic admixture. Sapiens (known as Cro-Magnon Man)  outcompeted Neanderthalensis, and the neanderthals eventually became extinct. Cro-Magnon Man (Homo sapiens) is considered the only ancestor of modern humans.
Windemere
Back to Top
Adalwolf View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 08-Sep-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1230
  Quote Adalwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Oct-2007 at 21:48
What exactly is the difference between Cro Magnon and modern man (homo sapiens vs homo sapiens sapiens)? 
Concrete is heavy; iron is hard--but the grass will prevail.
     Edward Abbey
Back to Top
Desperado View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 27-Apr-2006
Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
  Quote Desperado Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Oct-2007 at 15:41
From anthropological point of view the Homo Sapiens Fossilis (incl. Cro-Magnon) and Recens are identical (from 40000 onward ). A little bit strange are the Comb Capelle Man (some "primitive" Neanderthal features) and is sometimes refered as Homo sapiens aurignaciensis, Brunn-Przedmost-CroMagnon (again probably Neanderthal features are present, smaller stature) and the famous findings from Grimaldi (had some features characteristic for nowadays negroid race which distinguishes them from the other Cro-Magnon findings, smaller stature - 160cm). In general the Cro-Magnons were more robust than most modern humans and had greater brain and stature.
Dal people from Dalecarlia (now Dalarna, Sweden) and the Guanches of the Canary Islands, probably represent a relatively pure Cro-Magnon stock, but the current European population has little to do with these (West-European Cro-Magnon, Neanderthal and hybrids) people.

Edited by Desperado - 15-Oct-2007 at 15:51
Back to Top
Tyranos View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 246
  Quote Tyranos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Oct-2007 at 17:20
Cromagnons/Brunn weren't Neanderthal nor such features belong solely to that species, thats the problem with labeling brow-ridges and such as "Neanderthal", cause it was seen as primitive. Unfortunately you cannot go by anthropologists alone sadly, because they made many bad habits of linking  traits dubbed "robust" and 'archaic ", to Negroids, Mongoloids Australoid and Neanderthals. You had John Beddoe in the late 19th century calling Scottish and Irish, Negroids because they overabundance of Cromagnon traits according to him, while Anglo-Saxon's(modern English) were the most evolved. And you had Carleton Coon claiming the Cromagnons were evolved Neanderthals, and separate from the Mediterranean and its depigmented offshoot, the Nordic.  So scientific racism exists and still exists. Just looking at some of those reconstructions, just shows the politics and stupidity involved.


There is no genetic or true physical evidence of inter-breeding between Neanderthals and Cromagnons(modern man), though some scientists continue to push this, they also want to make the Neanderthal more like us, instead of the ape-like versions we were treated to in the past, so the effort to humanized them can be seen.

I think they were sub-branch that coexisted alongside us, parallel though separate species.
 

Edited by Tyranos - 15-Oct-2007 at 17:23
Back to Top
Desperado View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 27-Apr-2006
Location: Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 227
  Quote Desperado Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Oct-2007 at 19:51
Originally posted by Tyranos


There is no genetic or true physical evidence of inter-breeding between Neanderthals and Cromagnons(modern man), though some scientists continue to push this, they also want to make the Neanderthal more like us, instead of the ape-like versions we were treated to in the past, so the effort to humanized them can be seen.I think they were sub-branch that coexisted alongside us, parallel though separate species.


The only certain thing is that Neanderthals and Cro-Magnons co-existed for several thousand years in the same areas.

What's wrong with the reconstructions?
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.051 seconds.