History as no one else knows!

Well I guess Red, I should apply for graduate school right away? I would suggest that you read an old book that helped a lot of people a number of years ago, it is entitled "How to Win Friends and Influence People!", perhaps in your superb studies you might even have heard of it?

Actually my wife majored in accounting! Yes, life is Hell!

Continuing thanks for your support!

The "Tomato Master" earlier wrote these words which can be found above; "I find it amusing that whenever anyone responds to Fomenko's idiocy in a negative light, then they haven't read Fomenko's gargle. Not only are his ideas crap but he then goes on to try and prove his nuttiness by using statistical equations. The problems arise when you try and use those same equations to prove his math. DWNH!!!! [Don't Work No How"

Dear "master", I just don't think that you are able to understand connections? Fomenko makes literally hundreds of connections, most quite simple and "matter of fact" that connect our modern view of historography to reality!

That is this "group" lists connection after connection that ties past actions now considered seperated by hundreds of thousands of years, as a composit of one semi-real history that happened in the period of our currently considered past as 1000 CE to 1700 CE, or neary by!

I just fail to see how anyone (with a modicom of intelligence) can read page after page of such connections which are found in Vol's I and II of "History; Fiction or Science" without becoming a believer?

At best, it is only because these people have not really read the material, but they have merely dismissed it based upon the opinion(s) of others, who probably have also not really read the material!

The easy way out for people like this is to denigrate the intelligence of both those who might well support the Fomenko theory, as well as diminish the intelligence of, or the specialty, of those who instigated the theory!

I am just proud that I do not have to reply in kind!

Regards to all,

PS; Emeritus, meaning;

"adj.
Retired but retaining an honorary title corresponding to that held immediately before retirement: a professor emeritus.

n., pl., -ti (-tī').
One who is retired but retains an honorary title corresponding to that held immediately before retirement.

[Latin ēmeritus, past participle of ēmerērī, to earn by service : ē-, ex-, from; see ex- + merērī, to deserve, earn.]"


Edited by opuslola - 03-Oct-2010 at 21:55

Dear red clay, I don't really expect you especially to take me seriously! You would be the last person for me to make any type of impression upon!

You are stuck in your ways and beliefs, and refuse to even consider anything that could bring down the stone walls of your beliefs!

Have you every tried growing your "tomatoes", (I just loved that Vice President), in a water solution?

It is caled "hydro" something!

Regards,

Play nice children.

Edited by p,c,ma - 16-Dec-2010 at 21:29