The Huns Europid?

the past history of huns and mongols. It is why european believe huns and mongols were mongoloid, but in fact both of them were caucasian.

 

 

 

Todays mongolians appeared predominantly mongoloid, because they were scattered minor siberian tribes gathered by the Temujins, the ancestor of Ghengis Khan. Modern mongolian gene pool is consistent with siberian tribes, so siberian tribes provided a pure mongoloid population source for mongolia, while had nothing to do with the Temujin clan and his hordes.

It was the forced assimilation of siberian tribes under Ghengis Khan that created modern mongolian population, but Ghengis Khan and Temujins were not necessarily from siberian tribes, and all historical records do not indicate he was from Siberia. The mongoloid siberian tribes existed long before the coming of Temujins, the inuits, nenets, evenkis have been living in far northern Eurasia for more than 5000 years, and yet never been responsible for any sort of major invasion, nor any major tribal wars. Therefore the factor of assimilation was foreign to the traditional cultures of siberian tribes. Similiar to the pestilence experienced by the amerindians, which did not appear untill spaniards and portuguese came. The siberian tribes today still preserve their original lifestyle, minor, split, animist, family based, it is impossible for them to have form an empire completed with religious, political, military centers. The non-aggressiveness is a major mongoloid cultural trait worldwide, Cambodia, Siam, Mesoamerican, China, Japan had never been responsible for military conquest outside their traditional territory, the Mongol empire just came off as a sudden exception? There can never be cultural exceptions without foreign influence.

Also mongolian script during the time of Ghengis Khan was based on uighur language, a turkic islamic language. Uighurs are predominantly mixed between europids, arabid, east asian, they represented the most westernized tribes of China. Their linguistic influence in Mongol empire indicates the presence of western asian cultural, political, religious elements.

The invasion, rape, massacre have been a consistent trait of caucasian cultures from the records of the earliest indo-european culture-- India. Read Mahabharata, there are all about rapes and massacres.

 

Even not all mongoloids are the same, but we are closer to each other, will not be so far as to be so much like caucasians.

 

What do you mean by official ruler? Chinese culture lasted from 8000BC untill today. Mongolians were siberians gathered by colonizers, they used to be a peripheral ethnic of East Asia, but it does not mean they are unimportant to our history, and simply instruments of western propagandas.

 

In the western mind, when mongolians are mongols, they must be related to us, but when mongols turned out not mongolians, mongolians must not be part of us.

 

Thanks Opuslola for finding this out.

There had to be a difference.