Your ideal form of Government

Agreed.  I stand corrected. Folks, no matter what their government, will blame "the authorities."  However, what happens when authority is centralized into a small group of people?  More importantly when that authority disappears? 

Mord.

Rule by money and coorporations.  Companies are better managed and targeted with accumulating profit, thus companies are more efficient than government.  There also would be many of them all competing ruling out one company rule.  All types of people would be targeted to be milked for money and thus no one would be as oppressed as they can be by either a dictator or a majority.  Everything would be privatized and only a very loose non corporate entity would exist to break up monopolies.

History has shown that the more open and less regimented a society is the more inventions and technology it gets.  And the more government there is, the worse run things have been, look at the Soviet Union.

I advocate a fully authoritaritive dictatorship with no congress for a time being.  The dictatorship will lead the economy under no resistance, no human rights to increase GDP, until most of the population gets to eat thrice a day. 

To me, being poor and not having enough to eat is the most malignant sin a human can be castrated into.  Therefore, I would support an authoritarian government until people feed themselves well enough, and starts thinking out of their daily struggle, in which they'll automatically rebel peacefully to topple the government to replace it into a fully capable democratic government, supported by the vast majority of people who can feed themselves had have thoughtful comments on politics.

I just don't think democracy works on a world where 1% of the population gets to own 80% of the country's wealth, and where the most an average person can think of is to feed themselves for the day.  In that country, media will easily influence the dumb poor majority - it's no better off than a dictatorship government.  At least a dictatorship government is bound to either success for failure - democracy under charlatans are bound for nowhere close to success. 

Kaplan fan?

PHILOSOPRACY!

Either philosophers be rulers or rulers be philosophers.

Are u complately out of mind?

Just look at history...compare the time when a political entity was at the peak of its power to the time that entity witnessed the richness of its philosophers.

By richness,what i bear in mind is the spiritual richness,not material one.

As a juwish saying goes:

''The spirit of the man is the light of the Lord.''

You don't seem to have much experience of managing large corporations. Basically the rule of thumb is the larger the organisation, the more the cock-ups, whether you're talking private or public sector.

Don't disagree with that. But the main reason that most companies are more effective than most governments is that on the whole they're smaller. The other major reason is that they can kick out and not bother with anyone who can't contribute.

A government can't fire its people., no matter how incompetent they are.  

Hahaaaw you just made my day!

Maybe I have a new favorite country?  Who knows, my current views are only a matter of the times, in the past there are time when I like big government, it depends on the place and era really.