Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Unit 731

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Unit 731
    Posted: 09-Sep-2008 at 19:13
Originally posted by Sarmat12

You can't prove the thing which didn't exist.


what you call this?



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalmyk_deportations_of_1943
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Sep-2008 at 19:17
Originally posted by Cryptic

Sure, there were individual Bolshevick and Maoist rascists, but the focus of the governmental persecution was never racial. Chinese Maoists never even attempted to create a racial definition that would have classified say Tibetans as a seperate "race" and perscecute them for being racially "different".  


persecution of Tibetans still happens. and for one thing Tibetans are not considdered as Hans just because they are considdered Chinese (part of the country).


Edited by Temujin - 09-Sep-2008 at 19:29
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Sep-2008 at 19:28
Originally posted by Sarmat12

Yes. Soviet repressions were rather political in nature. Also the main victims of the Soviet terror were Russians by absolute numbers.
Besides it was noticed correctly that a lot of Bolshevik and later Soviet leaders were not ethnically Russians.
In any case nobody was descriminated or prosecuted by the Soviet State just because he belonged to another race. Actually, racism was labeled as "afake theory invented by capitalistic imperialists" in the USSR.


thats the typical Russian apologism. Russians were not main victims by total numbers, thats liek saying Germans were primary victims of Nazis. Wacko total number of gypsies in Germany was low and a total extermination of them would not have resulted in huge numbers but i would clal a total extermination very much as "main victims". same goes for Jews.
minorities were of course smaller in numbers than Russians but their persecution was more thouroughly compared to those Russians which became target of the Soviets. it were mostly minorities that became victims of Reds like Ukrainian Holodomor which affected most Ukrainians but only few Russians that were just unlucky to live there. and besides i already mentioned elsewhere that it matters little if the ruling elite itself is not the same ethnic than the primary subject people, i mean Hitler was Austrian and not few of his generals were not ethnic Germans, for example Polish Bach-Zelewski who was mainly responsible for putting down the Warsaw uprising of 44. it matters little who is in charge, it only matters who execute the orders and this was done by the Russians on other minorities. if i use your logic on the Warsaw uprising i could as well claim that a few German soldiers got caught up in a Polish Civil War or something...
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Sep-2008 at 20:35
Well. What you write is totally incorrect.
 
The thing you call "Golodomor" affected primarily agricultural areas of the USSR with rich farmers' population regardless of their ethnicity.
 
The numbers of Russian peasants who died in Volga region were also terribly high. Also millions of kazakhs, Bashkirs and Tatars died at the same time. There are very famous letters of Sholokhov to Stalin were he descibes the horrors of famine on Don to Stalin.
 
I'm afraid you're simply not very familiar with the facts. Stalin targeted rich peasants which he called "kulaks" and which opposed collectivization. Basically, he targeted rich agricultural areas.
 
Ukraine happened to have a mild climate suitable for agriculture so, of course local peasants became the targets of Stalins repressions. But so were also Russian peasants in Volga and Don region amd Caucasus as well as kazakhs and Bashkirs.
 
Please read this if you didn't know about that
 
 
 
It's true that Ukraine perhaps suffered the biggest blow, but it was because there were more populous farming regions than in the rest of the USSR, not because Ukrainians were particularly targeted. Russians in Povolzhie died in large numbers as well. Stalin wanted to eliminate kulaks as a strata of the society, but not Ukrainians or anybody else as an ethnicity.
 
It's also the fact that the people who were killed by Stalin during the great terror were mostly Russians. Simply because Russian formed the biggest part of the population of the USSR and Stalin repressions were not particularly targeted on a certain ethnic group except deportations.
 
However, the reasons for deporatations were again political. Like that Chechens and Crimean Tatars "collaborated with Germans" or that "Koreans could collaborate with Japanese" etc.  They were not performed because the Bolshevik leaders viewed Tatars of Chechens as some inferior races which needed to be exterminated etc. like the Nazists viewed Gypsies or Slavs.


Edited by Sarmat12 - 09-Sep-2008 at 20:55
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Sep-2008 at 21:12
the inhabitans of the areas primarily affected were all not Russian but Ukrainian, Cossack and German (Volga). the only real question is if those famines were engineered or not.

yeah of course deportations were political but they were targeted at ethnic groups and not political groups or individuals which makes it racist. ethnic Russians also colaborated with Germans on large scale but no Russian populations were deported (except prisoners of war).
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Sep-2008 at 22:00

As I said. Famine has affected agricultural areas of the USSR. In Povolzhie region most of the peasants who died were Russians, not Germans.

It's absurd to claim that Stalin wanted to get rid of Germans or Ukrainians and keep Russians intact. What was a real threat for him is the class of wealthy farmers/peasants who had land in their own property. He wanted to get rid of them. And Russian kulaks were as dangeruous for the Stalinist regime as any other Kulaks. Or you think a Russian kulak was fond of Stalin while a Ukrainian hated him? Both of them hated the Soviets authorities with equal hate. In fact, Stalin wanted to get rid of Russian nationalists as strong as he wanted to get rid of any other nationalist all of them were dangerous for the regime.
 
You're absolutely correct that Stalin sent millions of Soviet POWs to Gulag. Did he send there non Russian POWs only? He didn't care. Everybody who in his view was a "collaborator with Nazists" was punished even including their families, most of those poor fellows were Russians of course.
 
As about the ethnic deportations, Kalmyks, Chechens and Crimean Tatars actually indeed show a quite high level of collaboration with Germans. That's why Stalin found a reason to deport them. But he was able to move those ethnicities only because they were relatively small people which inhabitted a certain relatively small area.
 
Millions of Russians collaborated with Germans as well. But Stalin couldn't just deport all the Russians they already were everywhere in the country, so instead he just sent them in Gulag where they were dying in millions or shoot them right on the spot.
 
Have actually read the famous novel of Solzhenitsin "Gulag Archipelago" where he describes Gulag and from where the notion of Gulag was adopted in the West?
 
He describes the camps and their populations were detailed. And no doubt most of the people there were Russians who had any kind of "problems" with the terroristic regime of Stalin.
 
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
Husaria View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 28-Jul-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 150
  Quote Husaria Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Sep-2008 at 06:00
Sorry about turning this into a argument of morals it wasn't my intention.
Back to Top
Lipovan87 View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 28-Oct-2008
Location: Minnesota
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Lipovan87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Oct-2008 at 16:31
What is well noted is the giving of denigrating jobs and severe abuse to Central Asians in the Red Army. The flight of Jews out of the Soviet Union also indicates a degree of institutionalized anti-semetism.

The use of nationality in documents indicates that ethnicity was considered an important distinction. While Russians suffered as well under Communist policies, Russians eventually became viewed as the bulwark of the regime in the late Stalin period.

National Bolshevism is written about that ideological and policy shift.
Human error is a certainty, the location of it is not.
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Oct-2008 at 17:08
Originally posted by Lipovan87

What is well noted is the giving of denigrating jobs and severe abuse to Central Asians in the Red Army.
 
Nonsense. What abuse of Central Asians? Can you give sources, references, facts etc.  Confused 
 
Originally posted by Lipovan87

The flight of Jews out of the Soviet Union also indicates a degree of institutionalized anti-semetism.
 
The fact is that the state of Israel was created and survived only due to the Soviet support.

Originally posted by Lipovan87

The use of nationality in documents indicates that ethnicity was considered an important distinction. While Russians suffered as well under Communist policies, Russians eventually became viewed as the bulwark of the regime in the late Stalin period.
 
Use of ethnicity in the Soviet passport was viewed as a measure showing the respect to each and every ethnicity which according to the Soviet view was absent during the Soviet times.
 
Russians were the main victims of a non-Russian bloody clique of Stalin-Beria and Co.

Originally posted by Lipovan87

National Bolshevism is written about that ideological and policy shift.
 
I don't understand what you mean by this.
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
Lipovan87 View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 28-Oct-2008
Location: Minnesota
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Lipovan87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Oct-2008 at 19:40
http://www.amazon.com/National-Bolshevism-Stalinist-Formation-1931-1956/dp/0674009061/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

National Bolshevism is a book.

While Israel only survived with Soviet support in the first few years, the inability of the KGB to turn Israel into a Soviet ally meant a return to the old stance of anti-semetism.

For this, read The Sword and the Shield by Vasily Mitrokhin.

The treatment of Jews within the Soviet Union was always poor and denigrating. This was not always the anti-semetism sponsored as part of anti-capitalist and anti-religious sentiment in the 20's but a general derogatory view of Jews specially.

Russians suffered much but did not suffer the worst of Soviet treatment. Russians in positions of power suffered especially as did prosperous peasants. Every Russian suffered badly (just for the note, this is no surprise as I am a descendant of Russians who fled since 1917) but other groups suffered that and worse for their vulnerability and nationality.

The bad instances of hazing for Central Asians in the Army is one thing, they were also assigned to support units that did not handle vital functions and were kept away from having weapons.

http://books.google.com/books?id=VVFuYN8TS5AC&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=central+asians+soviet+army+hazing&source=web&ots=x2_ws-8oqh&sig=zA3KMi2LJBD0L3wbaQalPIl6AXA&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

Human error is a certainty, the location of it is not.
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Oct-2008 at 10:28
USSR definately DID target ethnic groups ...

... HOWEVER ....

They did not do so out of any sort of racial theory. Collective terror was employed against a number of ethnic groups who were seen as harbouring nationalist or separatist aspirations, or a cultural defiance of communist politics. The goal was to repress political elements, not races. Individuals from such ethnic communities who were seen as strongly pro-Bolshevik could aspire to high positions in the state bureaucracy - a great example is Stalin himself, a Georgian.

This is in contrast to the racial persecution of groups like the Nazis. Jews were targetted for being Jewish and it didn't matter how enthusiastic a particular Jew might have been about Hitler and Nazism, he was considered an enemy regardless of politics. No Jew was ever going to be Postmaster General, let alone Reichsfuhrer.

Instances of racism in the Red Army or society at large were present also, however, this had very little to do with Bolshevik policies - it was just a feature of Russian society, existing before, during, and after the communist period, and having no real impact on communist policies or aims - such racism was never formally institutionalized.


Edited by edgewaters - 30-Oct-2008 at 10:34
Back to Top
Voskhod View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 11-Oct-2008
Location: Melbourne
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 98
  Quote Voskhod Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 10:40
On Unit 731, the activities of the IJA medical units were as worse as what the Nazis did. There wasn't just the one unit, either. There were several, operating mainly in Japanese occupied areas of China and Manchuria. Experiment include effects of projectiles, extreme conditions, etc on the human body, human anatomy, and biological warfare. AFAIK the research has less racial overtones than the Nazis - they weren't trying to prove racial theories but the tests were just as cruel. After the war the United States granted amnesty to the members of these units in return for research data, some allegedly continue their work for the Americans. Those unlucky enough to fall into the hands of the Soviet Union were tried at Khabarovsk and sent to the Gulag.

On the Soviet Union, I agree with edgewaters (above post). You could also say the same for modern China.
"All the true heroes of history will be forgotten and all the villains will be remembered as heroes."
- Leo Tolstoy
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 14:08
Originally posted by Lipovan87

http://www.amazon.com/National-Bolshevism-Stalinist-Formation-1931-1956/dp/0674009061/ref=cm_cr_pr_product_top

National Bolshevism is a book.
 
This term never existed in the USSR. It's apparently an invention of some creative Western "historians." There is an extremist "party" called "National Bolshevik" leaded by the extravagant Mr. Eduard Limonov in modern Russia. But it consists of radical teenagers without clear political views and is not taken seriously both by the Russian public and establishment. The "agenda" of this party is also very far from the Leninist or Stalinist version of Bolshevik ideology.

Originally posted by Lipovan87

While Israel only survived with Soviet support in the first few years, the inability of the KGB to turn Israel into a Soviet ally meant a return to the old stance of anti-semetism. The treatment of Jews within the Soviet Union was always poor and denigrating. This was not always the anti-semetism sponsored as part of anti-capitalist and anti-religious sentiment in the 20's but a general derogatory view of Jews specially.

 
I'm very sorry but this is a total and complete nonsense. There was no any anti-semitic stances in the USSR. In fact the USSR in a sense gave to the Jews political and economic freedom which they were deprived of before the communist revolution in 1917. Jewish intellegentia retained a very high position in the USSR. Through out many decades during Stalin and after his death Soviet people were hearing all the news only broadcasted by the Jewish reporter Levitan. His voice has become iconic for the "Soviet culture." I can go on with the endless list of the Jews which were in power in the USSR.
 
It's true that the Soviets had their own agenda for the Jews, quite different from the Sionist agenda. They even created a Jewish autonomy in the USSR were Yiddish was an official language. Later, there was indeed too much anti-Sionist propaganda but it shouldn't be confused with the anti-Semitism which was considered a crime, a serious crime.

Originally posted by Lipovan87

Russians suffered much but did not suffer the worst of Soviet treatment. Russians in positions of power suffered especially as did prosperous peasants. Every Russian suffered badly (just for the note, this is no surprise as I am a descendant of Russians who fled since 1917) but other groups suffered that and worse for their vulnerability and nationality.
 
I have no doubt that the Russians were the most poor victims of the Soviet experiments and the Stalinist paranoia. There are plenty of fact regarding this. But for the beginning you can make yourself familiar with the works of the noble prize winner Alexander Soldzhenitsin.

[QUOTE=Lipovan87]The bad instances of hazing for Central Asians in the Army is one thing, they were also assigned to support units that did not handle vital functions and were kept away from having weapons.

http://books.google.com/books?id=VVFuYN8TS5AC&pg=PA93&lpg=PA93&dq=central+asians+soviet+army+hazing&source=web&ots=x2_ws-8oqh&sig=zA3KMi2LJBD0L3wbaQalPIl6AXA&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=1&ct=result

 
This is another nonsense which complitely doesn't make sense when you look at the statistics showing how many Central Asians were decorated with the Hero of the Soviet Union stars (the highest military decoration in the USSR) for fighting on the most dangerious sectors of the Eastern front.
 
There were indeed some people who were assigned to the rear, but it was because they simply lacked the necessary command of Russian language and/or education, not just because they were Central Asians.
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 14:09
Originally posted by edgewaters

USSR definately DID target ethnic groups ...

... HOWEVER ....

They did not do so out of any sort of racial theory. Collective terror was employed against a number of ethnic groups who were seen as harbouring nationalist or separatist aspirations, or a cultural defiance of communist politics. The goal was to repress political elements, not races. Individuals from such ethnic communities who were seen as strongly pro-Bolshevik could aspire to high positions in the state bureaucracy - a great example is Stalin himself, a Georgian.

This is in contrast to the racial persecution of groups like the Nazis. Jews were targetted for being Jewish and it didn't matter how enthusiastic a particular Jew might have been about Hitler and Nazism, he was considered an enemy regardless of politics. No Jew was ever going to be Postmaster General, let alone Reichsfuhrer.

Instances of racism in the Red Army or society at large were present also, however, this had very little to do with Bolshevik policies - it was just a feature of Russian society, existing before, during, and after the communist period, and having no real impact on communist policies or aims - such racism was never formally institutionalized.
 
Yes, I agree with this.
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
Lipovan87 View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 28-Oct-2008
Location: Minnesota
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Lipovan87 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 15:45
After a period of distrusting Russian Nationalism from 1917 to 1940, the war brought a refocus on Nationalism supporting the government. I am not saying that it was in any way related to the modern phenomenon. Simply that Russian Nationalism and Socialism became the two pillars of the government's ideology after WWII.

The Russian society has always had a degree of anti-semetism in it but the ideological considerations of the people in power tolerated it. You say there were many Jews in the Communist party, they were nominal Jews who like Trotsky did not care if Jews lived or died and hence might be considered to be no longer Jews. The refusal to hire people based on the third or fifth lines (referring to religion and ethnicity on the ID cards) in cases where they were well qualified would indicate that the uncompetitiveness of the Socialist economy gave room for people to hire along their prejudices.

While the USSR created to Jewish Autonomous Region, it was part of an effort to coopt Jewish sentiment from Israel to the Soviet Union. It mostly failed and was definitely given-up on with the shift to a more-pro Arab policy in the 60's. This shift entailed the demonization of Jews in general, not just Israel. This enabled long standing anti-semetism in the Party and people. Oftentimes the anti-Zionism of the Soviet Union by the 80's was little more than anti-semetism thinly veiled.

That may be true for WWII but the hazing indicates harsher relations for everyday activity. By the 70's and 80's, Central Asians were demeaned frequently and were treated as subordinate to Russians even when they theoretically outranked them.
Human error is a certainty, the location of it is not.
Back to Top
edgewaters View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Snake in the Grass-Banned

Joined: 13-Mar-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2394
  Quote edgewaters Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 16:04
Originally posted by Lipovan87

You say there were many Jews in the Communist party, they were nominal Jews who like Trotsky did not care if Jews lived or died


"The Tsarist police, in alliance with the landowners and the capitalists, organized pogroms against the Jews. The landowners and capitalists tried to divert the hatred of the workers and peasants who were tortured by want against the Jews. … Only the most ignorant and downtrodden people can believe the lies and slander that are spread about the Jews. … It is not the Jews who are the enemies of the working people. The enemies of the workers are the capitalists of all countries. Among the Jews there are working people, and they form the majority. They are our brothers, who, like us, are oppressed by capital; they are our comrades in the struggle for socialism. Among the Jews there are kulaks, exploiters and capitalists, just as there are among the Russians, and among people of all nations… Rich Jews, like rich Russians, and the rich in all countries, are in alliance to oppress, crush, rob and disunite the workers… Shame on accursed Tsarism which tortured and persecuted the Jews. Shame on those who foment hatred towards the Jews, who foment hatred towards other nations." - Lenin.

Obviously, your statement is simply not true. There did exist high ranking members of the communist party who were not careless about whether Jews lived or died, nor neutral on the subject of anti-semitism.


Edited by edgewaters - 31-Oct-2008 at 16:17
Back to Top
Sarmat View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3113
  Quote Sarmat Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Oct-2008 at 16:15
Originally posted by Lipovan87

After a period of distrusting Russian Nationalism from 1917 to 1940, the war brought a refocus on Nationalism supporting the government. I am not saying that it was in any way related to the modern phenomenon. Simply that Russian Nationalism and Socialism became the two pillars of the government's ideology after WWII.
 
Russian nationalism was never a Soviet ideology. Russian nationlism has been always condemned by the official Soviet doctrine and the Russian empire was always called nothing more than "the prison of nations (Lenin's term)." A lot of nationalist activists which were prosecuted during the imperial times were evaluated to the rank of national heroes in the USSR good example for example is the Ukrainian writer, Taras Shevchenko.


Originally posted by Lipovan87

The Russian society has always had a degree of anti-semetism in it but the ideological considerations of the people in power tolerated it.
 
Unfortunately, every Western society had a degree of anti-semitism and Russia doesn't stay out in this regard.
 
Originally posted by Lipovan87

You say there were many Jews in the Communist party, they were nominal Jews who like Trotsky did not care if Jews lived or died and hence might be considered to be no longer Jews.
 
Actually, your example is bad. Because Trotsky was the one who was forced to leave the SU. There were too many famous Jews in all the stratas of the Soviet society. It seems that, you even haven't been aware of Levitan, while he was actually more famous than Trotsky and every person in the SU knew him.
 
 
a wiki article about him in Hebrew:
 
 If I'm going to list all the famous Jewish writers, pop singers, composers etc. the list will be endless.
 
Originally posted by Lipovan87

The refusal to hire people based on the third or fifth lines (referring to religion and ethnicity on the ID cards) in cases where they were well qualified would indicate that the uncompetitiveness of the Socialist economy gave room for people to hire along their prejudices.
 
This is nonsense. Do you mean that Jews were denied some positions based on their ethnicity? It's nothing but some unconfirmed hearsay which goes complitely against the facts.
 
Even the chief of KGB during the worst times of the anti-Sionist propaganda in the USSR, Yuri Andropov, was Jewish.

Originally posted by Lipovan87

While the USSR created to Jewish Autonomous Region, it was part of an effort to coopt Jewish sentiment from Israel to the Soviet Union. It mostly failed and was definitely given-up on with the shift to a more-pro Arab policy in the 60's. This shift entailed the demonization of Jews in general, not just Israel. This enabled long standing anti-semetism in the Party and people. Oftentimes the anti-Zionism of the Soviet Union by the 80's was little more than anti-semetism thinly veiled.
 
Nonsense again. Are you talking from your own experience or reading some biased American "researchers"? Unfortunately, it reminds me of the similar kind statements about the grim situation in the USA which existed in the USSR during the cold war.
 
Anti-sionism never transferred in the anti-semitism in the USSR. The most popular children writers, composers and pop singers in the USSR were Jewish. Every child in the USSR grew up with a book written by the Jewish writer Samuil Marshak, the official voice of the Soviet Union and the most popular singer was Iosif Kobzon, the most popular composers were from Jewish Dunaevsky family. Too many actors which the Soviet people saw on TV every day were Jewish...
 
All these people were famous Jews, which never denied their origins. The Soviet policies were anit-Sionists, but not anti-semitic.
 
 
 


Originally posted by Lipovan87

That may be true for WWII but the hazing indicates harsher relations for everyday activity. By the 70's and 80's, Central Asians were demeaned frequently and were treated as subordinate to Russians even when they theoretically outranked them.
 
Another nonsense. A lot of important positions in the Soviet Army were almost complitely in the hands of the Central Asians and other ethnic minorities, like for example Baikonur cosmodrome.


Edited by Sarmat12 - 31-Oct-2008 at 16:25
Σαυρομάτης
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.102 seconds.