Just where was Babylon?

Perhaps I could have mis-interpreted your above points, but any attractions found in Iraq or any place where-by "mud-bricks" were used for the construction, are mostly left within the "eye of the be-holder!"

A mere base of rubble, does not a pyramid, nor a "tower to God", make!

Pictures from Jiroft: http://ivmp.wordpress.com/category/history/before-islam/jiroft-civilization/

Cyrus, it is not your description that upsets me, it is the vision of the upside down "arches" that upset your theory! Perhaps the depicitons would be more accurate if they were displayed up-side down?

Also, if one looks for a definition of the word "Shinar", etc., you will find this site;

http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Shinar.html

As well as this one;

http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-hebrew/2010-April/041515.html

It seems all is not clear on this particular point!

Regards,

Edited by opuslola - 02-Feb-2011 at 10:04

Cyrus, if the old "experts" acutally mis read the "stones" and "Babylon" was actually a place in Egypt,then what difference would it make in your "chronology?"

Could you assume such a mistake might have been made?

Regards,

Edited by opuslola - 07-Feb-2011 at 22:21

European migration in America have almost all possible habitats names.Names that once belonged to places they had came from.Even Atlantis exists today even its real existence we still have not approved until today
Why do you think that migration those days was different?Alexandria,Phillip etc...also Babylon we can found  all around during excavations in ancient world.Persians were in Egypt.Proof is third text,the last one,  on Roseta stone.

Cyrus showed us this:

"Pictures from Jiroft: http://ivmp.wordpress.com/category/history/before-islam/jiroft-civilization/

The gates and great ziggurat of Jiroft in front of a river:"

To describe a small remain found in the area!

But, to connect a seven or eight layer, (eight or ten story home) so called Ziggarat, to a Pyramid, is revolting!

It is obvious that the representation shown is or could be merely a good representation of the skill it took to take to make a residence for a "god" or a "king" or "queen", in the building prowness of mud brick exploitation into the sky!

You might, well want to review my above mention of thise sites?

"Also, if one looks for a definition of the word "Shinar", etc., you will find this site;

http://www.abarim-publications.com/Meaning/Shinar.html

" The etymology or meaning of the name Shinar is unknown.

Jones' Dictionary of Old Testament Proper Names derives it from (sh'r 2437). The root idea is to split open, to break through. Derivative (sha'ar 2437a) means gate. But this explanation fails to incorporate the letter nun.

More appealing is the word (na'ar 1387-1389):
(na'ar 1387) means to growl.
(na'ar 1388) means shake, shake out or off.
(na'ar 1389) is the root for words like (na'ar 1389a), boy, youth, and (na'ar 1389b), youth, early life.

This root preceded by the relative particle , meaning who, which, that, yields That What Is Young (or Shakes, Growls).

The name Shinar may even remind of a combination of the words (shin 2422a), tooth, from the verb (shanan 2422), sharpen, both literally and figuratively of the mind or intellect; and ('ar 2930a), foe, and Aramaic loan word which is very sporadically used in the Hebrew text of the Bible. The latter may also be a contraction of the much more common word ('ir 1615), city. That would bring the meaning of Shinar to Tooth Town, or City Of Wit."

As well as this one;

http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/b-hebrew/2010-April/041515.html

It seems all is not clear on this particular point!"




Edited by opuslola - 09-Feb-2011 at 20:07

My premise:Temple,biggest? one, was Gate of God.Need derivation something like "town/place where Gate of God is".Religious picture patterns were included inside Islam from Cristian religion also.Many temples can
be included inside the list:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Temple_in_Jerusalem
http://www.mazzaroth.com/ChapterThree/TowerOfBabel.htm
also this one keeps the gates in newer Persian religion remake:
http://www.crystalinks.com/janus.html
here they talk official about it:
http://www.shirhadash.org/rabbi/01/04/13/hallel.html
Egyptian temples:
http://www.king-tut.org.uk/ancient-egypt/egyptian-temples.htm
http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/publications/books/?bookid=21&chapid=106
 In the same time name gives us "Gates of God" monotheistic religion during government of Kingship of
polytheism.One more reason temple to be destroyed.

And, your use of this site;

http://www.crystalinks.com/janus.html

Only leaves everyone with other problems, well at least me!

Janus is obviously just a verson of John, Jon, Jahan, Ion, Gian, etc.!

Do some word examinations of the various versions of John, etc., and maybe you will come to some other determinations?

As well Cyrus, as regards your site shown above, it says;

"The Jiroft Civilization (Persian تمدن جيرفت) is a proposed Early Bronze Age civilization of Sistan, Iran (fl. ca. 26th century BC). It was proposed by Yousef Madjidzadeh in 2003 based on archaeological artefacts confiscated by Iranian authorities. White Muscarella (2005) expresses serious doubt in the validity of the “Jiroft Civilization” as an archaeological entity. The Jiroft site itself is of undisputed notability as a mid-3rd millennium city situated between the Elamite civilization to the west and the Indus Valley civilization to the east. here are some pictures. click on each for larger image."

You will quickly see that this source is not a valid one! The words "validity",and "Proposed", and "serious doubt", etc., cast some "doubt" upon the assumptions you consider as valid!



Edited by opuslola - 11-Feb-2011 at 20:27

Yes I agree about:History main repackage period,also bulls.t...We have different approach only.My posts stress non logical parts of history and develop the story of possibilities.Usage of fornication all around the people that debate about this one,marking my ideas territory, does not help the screenplay development,doesn't  it?