Print Page | Close Window

What does "Xiong nu "mean?

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Scholarly Pursuits
Forum Name: Linguistics
Forum Discription: Discuss linguistics: the study of languages
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2248
Printed Date: 01-Jun-2024 at 22:06
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: What does "Xiong nu "mean?
Posted By: Guests
Subject: What does "Xiong nu "mean?
Date Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 11:31
I am really curious about the meaning in Chinese? Or another language...



Replies:
Posted By: warhead
Date Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 15:17
literally it means ferocious slaves.


Posted By: eaglecap
Date Posted: 28-Feb-2005 at 15:33
I do not have a definition but this is from a book about the Sackler collection by Colin Renfrew. I have to condense this information from the book for a proposed brochure for the Cycladic Art Museum in 2001.

The artifacts represented in this period were produced when the Xiongu people controlled the eastern Eurasian steppes from the 3rd century BC –1st century AD. By the end of the 3rd century BC the Xiongnu people had subdued the other inhabitants of the eastern Eurasian steppes and had formed an immense empire.
Do an internet search!!





Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 01-Mar-2005 at 10:44

You didnt answer my question. I asked what is the meaning of the words "Xiong Nu"? Does it have a meaning in Chinese? Is this a name given to this group of people with purpose, identifying them?



-------------


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 06-Mar-2005 at 14:36

In Chinese, the word "Xiong" means ferocious. The word "Nu" means slave.

Yes, it does have a meaning in Chinese and as addressed above by warhead, it literally means ferocious slaves.

 



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 07-Mar-2005 at 10:07
Why they were called "ferocious slaves"? Why they were called so?

-------------


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 01:03
because that's what the han chinese thought the xiongnu people were.

-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 01:54
Originally posted by coolstorm

because that's what the han chinese thought the xiongnu people were.



I disagree...

It's simply a name used to denote a certain race.  Just like Mongol, or Manju, or Chaoxian don't mean anything really special.




-------------


Posted By: Sharrukin
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 03:44

It was probably based on an original Xiongnu name for themselves, but the Chinese have a penchant to either render the foreign name to suit their own phonetics or purposefully denigrate their enemies.  The same was true of the Ruruan, the eventual successors of the Xiongnu.  The Chinese characters translate to "the unpleasantly wriggling insects". 

Perhaps behind the Chinese name Xiongnu, lies an Altaic name, Khun, meaning "subject peoples".  As Chinese sources attest, the core of the Xiongnu was a tribe from earlier in their history known as the Xianyun which conquered many other tribes and thus became the ruling horde of many subject tribes known collectively as the "subject peoples".   Earlier, still, the Chinese knew of the Hu.  However, it is rather hazardous to try to make precise ethnic affiliations at such a remote a period, and the term Hu essentially became the Chinese word for "barbarian", (i.e. any or all peoples of non-Han origin). 



Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 04:11

china="zhongguo"= the central kingdom or the middle kingdom

"xiongnu" = "xiong"+slave     xiongyali=hungary (That is partly why common chinese people think there must be relationship between hun and xiongnu)

ancient japan=wedoo="wonu"="wo"+slave(from about 200-300 AD)

"xianbei"=xian +lower race

(negative meaning of nation names)

The rulers of ancient chinese dynasties are very proud of the culture of and prosperity and military force of china, they always use bad names for those nations who disobey the orders of tributing system or show some kind of independence and ignorance of chinese power.

 

chosun=chaoxian=moist (200-100 B.C)(first recorded in <shiji>

korea=gaoli=tall and beautiful

 

american="meilijian"=pretty+profit+tough

english="yinjili"="yin"+good luck

french="falanxi"="fa"+good smell flower  

italy='yi da li"="yi"+very high profit 

(Those good meaning in chinese of country names are obliged to by military force in the 19 century)

 

 

 



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 13:53

I disagree...

It's simply a name used to denote a certain race.  Just like Mongol, or Manju, or Chaoxian don't mean anything really special.

infact, not only the xiongnu, the japanese were also called "weinu", literally meaning "short" = wei, "nu" = slaves.

doesn't matter whether or not you agree that's the truth about what the chinese regarded the barbarians.

besides, you are not in a very good position to disagree given the fact that you don't know the chinese language.

according to han records, the xiongnu tribe was recorded as a normadic people that were uncivilized, ruthless, good at riding horse with no writing.

 



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 13:56
well, england, the "in" actually means good looking not good luck.

-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Rava
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 17:28

american="meilijian"=pretty+profit+tough

english="yinjili"="yin"+good luck

french="falanxi"="fa"+good smell flower  

italy='yi da li"="yi"+very high profit 

All of them look like just repetition of the original sound of the name. Don't you think the positive meaning is only a coincidence?

For Xiong nu name's disscusion I assume this text could be interesting:

"[However, in spite of Pulleyblank’s arguments, it must be admitted that the name Xiongnu carries strongly derogatory connotations, and was unlikely to have been used by the people themselves.
          The first character xiong nowadays means ‘thorax’ or ‘chest,’ the seat of intelligence and emotions; but originally it had the meaning of ‘evil hidden within the man’ – see GR No. 4593. The second character, nu means simply ‘slave’ or ‘serf’. I believe the answer lies in the fact that they did not refer to themselves as Xiongnu but, rather, used other terms ore or less closely related in sound but without the derogatory overtones. The clues may be found, I believe, in the following passage from Yu (2000), p. 180 which apparently lists transcriptions of some of the names the Xiongnu tribes may have used for themselves:

“Of the tribes of the Xiongnu 匈奴as seen in the Shiji , ch. 110, there was a Hunyu 渾庾 and a Hunxie , which may have derived from the Kunwu 昆吾. This is because the Hunyu 渾庾 [kuən-jio], Hunxie [kuən-zya] and Kunwu 昆吾[kuən-nga] can be regarded as different transcriptions of the same name.”

Pulleyblank’s EMC reconstructions for these characters are: hunyu 渾庾 – ɣwən-juã; hunxie 渾邪ɣwən-zia or ɣwən-yé; kunwu 昆吾 – kwən-ŋ¿.
          Although the question of a connection between some branch of the Xiongnu and the Huns who invaded Europe in the 4th century remains unproven, it does seem likely, and is accepted by many scholars. The strong possibility of phonetic connections between these names and the later names for the ‘Huns’ who invaded Europe is clear. This can be easily seen by looking at the forms of the names for the later Huns in various languages given in Partridge (1958), p. 299.>>

“Hun, whence Hunnian, Hunnic, Hunnish.
Hun is a b/f from OE Hüne or Hünas, the Huns, itself prob. From LL Hūni (ML, usu Hunni), with less correct var Chūni or Chunni, prob from Ch Han (var Hiong-nu); cf. Skt Huṇa, Gr Ounnoi or Khounoi, and also ON Hūnar and OHG Hūni (G Hunnen). These invaders from Asia overran and terrorized Europe c372-453
A.D., Attila dying in the latter year. Cf the G derivative Hune, MHG hiune, a giant (Walshe).” ]"  John E. Hill, The People of the West. http://www.depts.washington.edu/uwch/silkroad/texts/weilue/weilue.html - http://www.depts.washington.edu/uwch/silkroad/texts/weilue/w eilue.html

>> 

 



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 19:00

All of them look like just repetition of the original sound of the name. Don't you think the positive meaning is only a coincidence

i would say it's kinda both.

when these names were translated into chinese, the chinese tried to give them some positive meanings while fitting the sound of these names in english.

the japanese however did otherwise.

since "rice" and "beautiful" sound similar (min or mei) in chinese and i suppose it's similar in japanese as well, the short form of the usa is called "beautiful" country in china but it's called "rice" country in japan. both "beautiful and rice" can be used but the chinese picked "beautiful" to give it a more possitive name.



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 08-Mar-2005 at 20:21
Originally posted by Elanjie

china="zhongguo"= the central kingdom or the middle kingdom

"xiongnu" = "xiong"+slave     xiongyali=hungary (That is partly why common chinese people think there must be relationship between hun and xiongnu)

ancient japan=wedoo="wonu"="wo"+slave(from about 200-300 AD)

"xianbei"=xian +lower race

(negative meaning of nation names)

The rulers of ancient chinese dynasties are very proud of the culture of and prosperity and military force of china, they always use bad names for those nations who disobey the orders of tributing system or show some kind of independence and ignorance of chinese power.

 

chosun=chaoxian=moist (200-100 B.C)(first recorded in <shiji>

korea=gaoli=tall and beautiful

 

american="meilijian"=pretty+profit+tough

english="yinjili"="yin"+good luck

french="falanxi"="fa"+good smell flower  

italy='yi da li"="yi"+very high profit 

(Those good meaning in chinese of country names are obliged to by military force in the 19 century)

 



Yes they all do mean something, but that doesn't mean any of it was intentional.  They probably were simply using characters that sounded closest to what these barbarian tribes called themselves.

For instance, President Bush's name in Chinese means "wet Diaper".  Was this done on purpose?  I think not, he was simply named such b/c those certain characters best pronounced his name.


-------------


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 09-Mar-2005 at 01:34

wet Diaper

this is ridiculously wrong. the first character of bush's name can mean "fabric". the second character can mean "special".  when they are put together, they don't have any meaning and are not structurally meaningful. i am not sure but i believe in china and taiwan, they use different chinese characters for bush's name from the ones used in hong kong because mandarin sounds kind of different from cantonese. but as far as i know, it does not have any meaning either.

for bush, it's just the sound that matters.

for xiongnu, wa japanese, they do have some meanings when the characters are put together. japan was called "wei nu" which can be translated as "short / poor slave". please note that "nu" definitely doesn't sound anything close to japan. "nu" (slave) was used to name both the xiongnu and the japanese.

there are some names that have meanings. such as the name of the usa, which literally means "beautiful country". the chinese name of "usa" sounds a little different in cantonese from it does in mandarin. the sound is not always the reason why the name is made this way. in some cases, it does, while in some others, it does not. a lot of times, they consider both the sound factor and the meaning.

for the case of xiongnu, it sounds nothing from what the xiongnu people call themselves and does have a meaning of "slave" and inferior. please read the article above or what i quoted for you below.

 

i dunno where u got that "wet diaper" idea from but may i repeat it once more: ur not in a very good position to justify what the chinese know about their language when you don't know it yourself. and you are not gonna look so good.

you obviously haven't read the above quote made by another member and here you go:

"However, in spite of Pulleyblank¡¯s arguments, it must be admitted that the name Xiongnu carries strongly derogatory connotations, and was unlikely to have been used by the people themselves.
          The first character ÐÙ xiong nowadays means ¡®thorax¡¯ or ¡®chest,¡¯ the seat of intelligence and emotions; but originally it had the meaning of ¡®evil hidden within the man¡¯ ¨C see GR No. 4593. The second character, Å« nu means simply ¡®slave¡¯ or ¡®serf¡¯. I believe the answer lies in the fact that they did not refer to themselves as Xiongnu but, rather, used other terms ore or less closely related in sound but without the derogatory overtones. The clues may be found, I believe, in the following passage from Yu (2000), p. 180 which apparently lists transcriptions of some of the names the Xiongnu tribes may have used for themselves"



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 09-Mar-2005 at 02:18
Originally posted by coolstorm

wet Diaper

this is ridiculously wrong. the first character of bush's name can mean "fabric". the second character can mean "special".  when they are put together, they don't have any meaning and are not structurally meaningful. i am not sure but i believe in china and taiwan, they use different chinese characters for bush's name from the ones used in hong kong because mandarin sounds kind of different from cantonese. but as far as i know, it does not have any meaning either.

for bush, it's just the sound that matters.

for xiongnu, wa japanese, they do have some meanings when the characters are put together. japan was called "wei nu" which can be translated as "short / poor slave". please note that "nu" definitely doesn't sound anything close to japan. "nu" (slave) was used to name both the xiongnu and the japanese.

there are some names that have meanings. such as the name of the usa, which literally means "beautiful country". the chinese name of "usa" sounds a little different in cantonese from it does in mandarin. the sound is not always the reason why the name is made this way. in some cases, it does, while in some others, it does not. a lot of times, they consider both the sound factor and the meaning.

for the case of xiongnu, it sounds nothing from what the xiongnu people call themselves and does have a meaning of "slave" and inferior. please read the article above or what i quoted for you below.

 

i dunno where u got that "wet diaper" idea from but may i repeat it once more: ur not in a very good position to justify what the chinese know about their language when you don't know it yourself. and you are not gonna look so good.

you obviously haven't read the above quote made by another member and here you go:

"However, in spite of Pulleyblank¡¯s arguments, it must be admitted that the name Xiongnu carries strongly derogatory connotations, and was unlikely to have been used by the people themselves.
          The first character ÐÙ xiong nowadays means ¡®thorax¡¯ or ¡®chest,¡¯ the seat of intelligence and emotions; but originally it had the meaning of ¡®evil hidden within the man¡¯ ¨C see GR No. 4593. The second character, Å« nu means simply ¡®slave¡¯ or ¡®serf¡¯. I believe the answer lies in the fact that they did not refer to themselves as Xiongnu but, rather, used other terms ore or less closely related in sound but without the derogatory overtones. The clues may be found, I believe, in the following passage from Yu (2000), p. 180 which apparently lists transcriptions of some of the names the Xiongnu tribes may have used for themselves"




Hmm..it seems I was incorrect about Bush...well that's what the people at China History Forum were telling me....oh well...

Eh w/e...if you don't think I'm qualified to even talk in this thread..I guess I'm not

Cheers!

-GJ


-------------


Posted By: babyblue
Date Posted: 10-Mar-2005 at 00:04
     omg janggoon...

-------------


Posted By: MURAT BEY BAYAT
Date Posted: 10-Mar-2005 at 16:10

"Xiong-nu" derive from Hunnu "related to Huns" in Turkic.

"Alpu" related to Alps etc...

 Alpu is a small town in the district of Ankara !

 



Posted By: ihsan
Date Posted: 11-Mar-2005 at 16:23

It's already posted here that Xiongnu means "Ferocious Slaves" in Modern/Mandarin Chinese. However, the character ™± Xiong was pronounced as "Hong" in Ancient Chinese so the name was Hongnu (Hung-nu in Wade-Giles transcription), which must have been a Chinese transcription/corruption of the name Hun/Khun/Qun.



-------------
[IMG]http://img50.exs.cx/img50/6148/ger3.jpg">

Qaghan of the Vast Steppes

http://steppes.proboards23.com - Steppes History Forum


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 13-Mar-2005 at 20:19

It's already posted here that Xiongnu means "Ferocious Slaves" in Modern/Mandarin Chinese. However, the character ™± Xiong was pronounced as "Hong" in Ancient Chinese so the name was Hongnu (Hung-nu in Wade-Giles transcription), which must have been a Chinese transcription/corruption of the name Hun/Khun/Qun.

it is still pronouced as hon in modern cantonese.

doesn't matter what it sounds like cause all chinese dialects are the same in writing. the word "xiong" means "ferocious" it sounds hong in cantonese, xiong in mandarin but it's the same character with the same meaning.

some say ancient chinese actually spoke cantonese in court other than mandarin.



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 13-Mar-2005 at 20:22
That's exactly what I was saying.  Ancient Chinese didn't speak Mandarin, they spoke a dialect closer to the southern ones, where Xiong, is pronounced "Hun" or something to that extent.  

-------------


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 13-Mar-2005 at 22:18

That's exactly what I was saying.  Ancient Chinese didn't speak Mandarin, they spoke a dialect closer to the southern ones, where Xiong, is pronounced "Hun" or something to that extent.  

to be more precise, it's "hown".



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Imperator Invictus
Date Posted: 13-Mar-2005 at 22:39
It's already posted here that Xiongnu means "Ferocious Slaves" in Modern/Mandarin Chinese. However, the character ™± Xiong was pronounced as "Hong" in Ancient Chinese so the name was Hongnu (Hung-nu in Wade-Giles transcription), which must have been a Chinese transcription/corruption of the name Hun/Khun/Qun.


However, Hungarians are/were not the Huns, which shows why you can't rely on simple pronunciation to prove association.


-------------


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 13-Mar-2005 at 22:50

However, Hungarians are/were not the Huns, which shows why you can't rely on simple pronunciation to prove association.

i was under an impression that the hungarians are descendants of attila, the huns.

if not, who were their ancestors?



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Imperator Invictus
Date Posted: 14-Mar-2005 at 00:41
Most are of Magyar descent.

The term Hungarian comes from corruption of "Onogur". When the Magyars invaded, some mistakenly thought they were Huns, and merged that term into Onogur, another nomadic group.


-------------


Posted By: Temujin
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2005 at 16:56

Originally posted by Imperator Invictus


However, Hungarians are/were not the Huns, which shows why you can't rely on simple pronunciation to prove association.

yes but it's not what they called themselves, nor what their neighbours called them like.



-------------


Posted By: HulaguHan
Date Posted: 16-Mar-2005 at 20:15

Originally posted by Imperator Invictus

Most are of Magyar descent.

The term Hungarian comes from corruption of "Onogur". When the Magyars invaded, some mistakenly thought they were Huns, and merged that term into Onogur, another nomadic group.

This is an excellent knowledge Imperator, even many Turkish historians fail in this issue. Man I am greatly impressed by your knowledge.

Likewise he said, Hungary is a modification/change of Onogur...




Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com