Hitler and Germans the laughing stock of History

 

However there is little or no truth that the Europeans did not know wht was occuring under nazism. In many states the people assisted the Nazis in masscreing its Jewish populations, especially in Poland, where the first camp was established, with its christian population actively pointing out their Jewish neighbours to the Germans. Considering that European christians had a continious and old history of acting according to the teachings of the church - the 'Ve vere not avare' claim is very weak.  Although there were some brave christians durring the Nazi period, who risked and lost their lives defending the Jews - critical mass applies, and the majority were already beyond changing their minds after centuries of racist teachings.

 

It is a pity that an otherwise brilliant nation like Germany seccumbed to racism, fostered originally and for some 2000 years in so-called emancipated Europe - which was hijacked by the church. During the dark ages, European christianity under church rule was the biggest mass murderer of innocent peoples in all past recorded history, with its charges of deicide, blood libels, the Protocols and other such horrific falsehoods; the crusades, instigated by the church, was only one of these results - but far worse occured inside Europe.

 

Today, Europe is silent of radical islamists emulating these doctrines, and openly  teaching these European falsehoods as real history. There is a full onus on christians to address these falsehoods, because they came from Europe. There is a greater onus on Muslims to address such false and horrible doctrines - it is simply not credible they believe such to be sanctioned by a Godly inclined religion.

 

The correction of these attrocities will benefit Christianity and Islam - and its failure will eventually negate these religions. Truth does not get destroyed, it eventually pops up by itself. Truth is a correction, and the universe is omherently built on truths, which is referred to as correct equations in science and maths. It has become very difficult for christians and muslims to correct these false and racist teachings, because of fear and/or cowardice, and partly because some mistakingly believe them as truths and by alligning such terrible doctrines as being of divine origins.

 

We can see that today, a mass murderous Pope called Pious is to be made a Saint, and as yet there is no fatwah for Bin Laden. What does that say - are all the people free of onus and guilt here that they remain silent of it? It is this very silence which was and is today the cause of all such attrocities. There is only one applicable divine law, or moral truth, which applies:

 

'A FALSEHOOD AND THE HOLY ONE CANNOT ABIDE TOGETHER'

 

'YOU SHALL NOT WITNESS YOUR FELLOWMAN'S INNOCENT BLOOD AND REMAIN IDLE'

 

- This means a religion based on promoting a lie and using it to commit evil - whereby all its adherents remain silent - will definitely be destroyed. This is what occured with Sodom, Ghammorah, and later with Ancient Egypt, Babylon and Mighty Rome.

Just a joke! And unfortunatel the Austrians are/were Germans. They didn't belong to the German Federation (Deutscher Bund) after 1866 and to the 2nd Reich but that had nothing to do with their ethnicity. After WWII they created a national feeling as Austrians, because they didn't want to be punished like the Germans in the territory of the 3rd Reich.

 

I think it would be a great idea to say the Nazis did all these crimes and not the Germans. But unfortunately the most of them were Germans. So I don't have a problem if you say the Germans did it. This is the cause why I did not like the term Nazi-Germany. They didn't come from Mars or somewhere else. They were elected from a lot of my fellow-citizens, probably (I can't ask them anymore) not from my grandparents, but surely from enough of my other relatives. But the killing was not a pure German phenomenon. There were so many Governments that worked together with the Nazi-Regime (France, Argentina, Finland or Norway, Greece for a short time). There were so many states and people that dealed with Germany (Sweden, Switzerland e.g.; or think of the Bush family. If I rember correct, the grandfather of G.W. made his fortune with Hitler). There were so many supporters of the Nazis abroad (in England, USA e.g.)There were so many Europeans who fought in the SS and there were so many foreigners who served in the concentration camps, there were even an over-average of Austrian and from the Baltic states e.g.

 

We have to discover now, why all these people and states did this, how could this happen, not because we want to blame somebody but because we have to prevent, that such things will happen again.

And, in my opinion, we should identify clearly who commited the crime, and not say that the crime is a german crime, or an american crime, or a russian crime..., but a crime comited by nazis, soldiers, state, robbers, drug dealers, by the american John Doe or by the frenchman Jacques Bonhomme, for example, because identify crimes as something natural of a whole nation is indeed xenophoby...

 

When you say german crimes instead of nazi crimes, when you are talking about some of the most horrendous crimes in History, is an ofense for all the good Germans that fought (acordingly with their capacities) against Hitler and his minions, and is identifiyng all german nation as criminal, to me this is the most despikable kind of xenophobia: the demonization of all a people... 

 

Try to see this way King John: you certainly consider a crime the abuse over prisioners in Abu Ghraib, you think we should talk about american crimes or american soldiers crimes; one of the statements implies all of a nation (that deserve my respect and esteem) another only the true criminals: some soldiers and oficials of the american army.

You understand now what im trying to say?

Who comited the crimes are the nazis not the Germans.

Nobody can blame the Germans for the WWII crimes, but can blame the nazis for that crimes.

And i think is xenophobia (fear from the other, and hatred also...) brand all Germans for the crimes of only a part of the Germans (and other nacionalities): the nazis (most notably the SS).

My friends... i only try make you understand that we cant blame all a people, because that is unfair to a part of that people (and a type of demonization of the same: that brings xenophobia over them; a thing that Germans experienced the next few years after 1945....) inocent of the crimes.

Is ofensive also for the Germans than fight (and died...) against the nazi regime.

Can be more easy say the Germans commited atrocious crimes against Humanity but isnt true: the Nazis commited atrocious crimes against the Humanity, because more people of others european (and dont only Germans...) countries gave a great help to the nazis (namely joining or actively helping the SS) in the arrest, torture and death of the enemies of the nazi regime.

You can understand now why i gave so much importance in clarify that the criminals are nazis and the nacionality is secondary?

.

 

Im my opinion speak about the crimes of a people is a kind of hatred toward that people because join inocents and guilties, and indentify all the people as criminal.

 

Much people tend to put in the same place nazi ciminals and inocents germans, thats why i dont like to talk about german crimes but, instead, i talk about nazi crimes.

 

I follow the same principle when people talk about the american crimes in Guantanamo: there arent american crimes in Guantanamo but american military crimes...

 

We cant blame all by the mistakes of some!